So he was black, so what, and slavery was legal, so what?
Keep in mind the push to label blacks as somehow beneath whites began in the early 1700s when the whites in the south realized that the black and white slaves were a threat.
They began using the white slaves to oversee the black slaves, telling the white slaves that they were better. Divide and conquer.
The plantation owners in the Indies did the same, setting whites against blacks against asians. Divide and conquer.
Yet somehow we are still buying into this crap. The divide is between rich and poor, anything else is smoke.
Yet it was legal at the time, was legal worldwide and practiced at the time worldwide. To attack people for having a slave once it was a crime is one thing to attack the long dead when it was common practice and legal to me is ridiculous.
Yeah owning slaves wasn't so taboo back then, that's isn't the point. The commie propagandists portray our history as beginning in 1619 with evil whitey oppressing brown people. So when one of those poor 1619 Africans was actually one of people leading the charge establishing slavery that is pertinent information, not because muh evil black people, because the history is complete bullshit.
I agree with you on that, absolutely. I just am sick to death of events that too place over two hundred years ago being grounds for someone thinking that it somehow means they have a "ticket."
So he was black, so what, and slavery was legal, so what?
Keep in mind the push to label blacks as somehow beneath whites began in the early 1700s when the whites in the south realized that the black and white slaves were a threat.
They began using the white slaves to oversee the black slaves, telling the white slaves that they were better. Divide and conquer.
The plantation owners in the Indies did the same, setting whites against blacks against asians. Divide and conquer.
Yet somehow we are still buying into this crap. The divide is between rich and poor, anything else is smoke.
not about one race or the other, its about owning 1619 libtards, which ironically he was one of those first blacks to arrive in 1619
Yet it was legal at the time, was legal worldwide and practiced at the time worldwide. To attack people for having a slave once it was a crime is one thing to attack the long dead when it was common practice and legal to me is ridiculous.
Yeah owning slaves wasn't so taboo back then, that's isn't the point. The commie propagandists portray our history as beginning in 1619 with evil whitey oppressing brown people. So when one of those poor 1619 Africans was actually one of people leading the charge establishing slavery that is pertinent information, not because muh evil black people, because the history is complete bullshit.
I agree with you on that, absolutely. I just am sick to death of events that too place over two hundred years ago being grounds for someone thinking that it somehow means they have a "ticket."