The old "just a theory" nonsense trotted out by science-illiterate dipshits. The reason you don't care to debate is because your very first sentence betrays your lack of knowledge. Your fourth and subsequent statements confirms your dipshittery.
To be fair to this person, the theory portion would be correct, "if" it was a theory. It is not. It is the "Law" of gravity, in which the scientific community has given it. Theories still have to be proven and built upon to make it into said law. Most of the other stuff is well, odd to put it lightly.
It is not a "law". There are no "laws" in science, only in "popular science". Every hypothesis is just that, a hypothesis. A single or group of hypotheses can form a theory for a given phenomenon, usually after some time has passed and some experiments have been replicated that don't disprove the hypothesis. The scientific method is almost entirely about disproving, not proving a hypothesis. "Proof" only comes about after you (and others) have bashed a hypothesis in every conceivable way trying to disprove it, but even then, should a better experiment poke a hole in your proof/hypothesis, it weakens its veracity. It's a common misconception that scientific theories are "proven 100%". They aren't. Some are more certain than others (i.e. gravity, evolution, thermodynamics, etc), but no good scientist would ever claim 100% certainty.
Well technically gravity is just a theory.
In a video game there isn't a force that is holding you down it's just so.
I don't care that the church of science says their priests have detected gravity waves.
Science has to be repeatable or it's not science.
Math is also not science, if it is please post the part of the scientific method that supports your claim.
Photons are also not matter, there would be piles of photons everywhere.
I also don't care to debate you.
Something about a chicken and checkers.
The old "just a theory" nonsense trotted out by science-illiterate dipshits. The reason you don't care to debate is because your very first sentence betrays your lack of knowledge. Your fourth and subsequent statements confirms your dipshittery.
To be fair to this person, the theory portion would be correct, "if" it was a theory. It is not. It is the "Law" of gravity, in which the scientific community has given it. Theories still have to be proven and built upon to make it into said law. Most of the other stuff is well, odd to put it lightly.
It is not a "law". There are no "laws" in science, only in "popular science". Every hypothesis is just that, a hypothesis. A single or group of hypotheses can form a theory for a given phenomenon, usually after some time has passed and some experiments have been replicated that don't disprove the hypothesis. The scientific method is almost entirely about disproving, not proving a hypothesis. "Proof" only comes about after you (and others) have bashed a hypothesis in every conceivable way trying to disprove it, but even then, should a better experiment poke a hole in your proof/hypothesis, it weakens its veracity. It's a common misconception that scientific theories are "proven 100%". They aren't. Some are more certain than others (i.e. gravity, evolution, thermodynamics, etc), but no good scientist would ever claim 100% certainty.