2267
Comments (191)
sorted by:
-4
FlatEarth2020 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Lovely bit of CGI there, FakeX! Lol. This crap would end up on the cutting room floor for South Park.

3
dougkeenan [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're welcome to drive down and watch. You are so last year.

0
FullAutoFlintlock 0 points ago +2 / -2

Amazing. Keep it up.

Everyone do yourself a favor.. buy as much tsla as you can, buy til it hurts and hold. Give your kids an amazing future. Please do it.

5
Ch138 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fly high. Fall fast. SpaceX

8
Coprolite 8 points ago +10 / -2

Why do all rockets look like penises? We need a vagina rocket they could call it a V1.......wait

6
Teapede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Physics is sexist because penises are clearly the best aerodynamic shape for a rocket

2
FullAutoFlintlock 2 points ago +3 / -1

I always run without pants and an erection.

12
Groupthinkgroupthink 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just got to work on that landing a little bit'

Yeah sure, just a little less explody

8
iHateClothes 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lmao it blew up again

4
LtPatterson 4 points ago +5 / -1

So a rinse and repeat of SN8?

1
dougkeenan [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

SN9 went much higher before making its crater

7
br_62805 7 points ago +7 / -0

SN8 had a problem with the bypass thing which is why the landing was fouled. In the SN9 landing footage the announcer said they'd do it with 2 engines and clearly only 1 of the engines was firing. Prior to this there were pieces of engine shooting out on the video.

Im guessing they had a reasonable assumption that a crash would happen but went ahead with it anyway for the data.

2
iSignedUpForThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you know how much these cost?

1
residue69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cheap compared to other launch vehicles.

Check out these two videos linked in another comment.

One of them compares the costs of various launch vehicles.

4
TurdManJones 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well its completely made out of stainless steel so it doesn't cost that much when compared to your traditional rocket

9
Ineedsanity 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was going great until it went full Biden...

8
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 8 points ago +8 / -0

Never go full Biden.

3
Ineedsanity 3 points ago +3 / -0

True, last time it truly happened... Clown World surged to power. ;)

8
Officer_Glowie 8 points ago +8 / -0

Meanwhile Bezos' spaceship still looks like a gigantic dick.

14
ztrich007 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is what a true African-American accomplishment looks like

3
Saunders 3 points ago +3 / -0

If only the looked just a little more like cocks we may be able to send people like Schiff out of here

2
Trumpdidit 2 points ago +3 / -1

Wonderful,,,What could possibly go wrong....?

2
dougkeenan [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've got FAA up in their grille now, we're about to find out.

6
JustBoo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bitchute, Rumble, SpaceX website... ANYWHERE other than Youtube.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/sciencetech/video-2346978/Video-SpaceX-launches-Starship-SN9-test-flight-safety-delays.html

Wait till that video finishes and you can watch others of the flight, like the Boom at the end.

1
Polkadotard 1 point ago +5 / -4

Looks like Bender's buttplug.

2
leDonaldAlwaysWins 2 points ago +2 / -0

i mean it does look like big mikes vibrator

18
CatfishJack 18 points ago +18 / -0

“Everything looked good but we need to work on that landing just bit.”

7
John_Chadeaux 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imagine having a job where you destroy spaceships for research.

That guy that sweeps for fires afterwards though? He sounded defeated. 🤣 🔥😔

1
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to wonder at what point the boss fire them for destroying them on purpose?

19
GEoP 19 points ago +19 / -0

It was absolutely incredible 99% of the way

6
BlackFlag 6 points ago +9 / -3

It was a test flight, not a test landing. Crash and burn was intentional.

5
Street_Doc 5 points ago +6 / -1

I’m sure they were ok with a crash, but to think they didn’t want to land that baby is mistaken.

4
Backslash2099 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think it was intentional, they did try to land, but the crash wasn't unexpected.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
TheBestDuck 9 points ago +10 / -1

I'm sorry. What part wasn't incredible?

2
RacistHomophob 2 points ago +7 / -5

Looks like a Dick

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

That reminds me of Hugo Chavez from Tales from the Borderlands(office scene First chapter).

3
lamboSons 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the silo is the balls

1
LugNuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thick n Quick

5
PB_Mack 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s very girthy.

8
awsure 8 points ago +8 / -0

That sudden stop at the end needs some work 😂

5
Captainzoomer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just need to lower the ground some.

24
redpillsrus 24 points ago +24 / -0

Fun to see this on here. I actually think that space - and especially private sector space can be a big factor in conservative politics moving forward.

First, SpaceX is clearly a Trump era win, and private sector is here to stay. His policies for moon-then-mars and funding for space, and reduction of red tape at FAA, EPA, and NASA paved the way for this progress. SpaceX shows how lean private industry is better than entrenched bureaucracy at developing rockets. There's a place for NASA, but SLS is Apollo tech and moving sooo much slower than SpaceX.

Second, almost everybody can get behind the idea of space. It's a populist platform agenda. Sure, some object on grounds that funding may be better spent on XYZ, but that's where conservatives have an edge: public funds are limited, but that's why we want to incentivize private sector space initiatives and build a marketplace. Space tourism, commercial launch, and even mining are now on our horizon and if government facilitates when appropriate and then stays out of the way, we will launch whole new industries.

Third, America is first in this area. Russia is flying old rockets, and everybody is way behind our tech. If Biden doesn't screw it up or sell it to China, we're set to return to the moon, send men to mars, and start up several industries around space.

0
SpezIsANazisCumRag 0 points ago +1 / -1

For all those that care more about spending more money on local initiatives than space just remember that space is where out economic future and freedom is at.

Mining asteroids and colonizing space is what will help our planet the most. Our Solar System is incredibly rich. 16 Psyche is just one of the asteroids in our Solar System that has an estimated 10 quintillion dollars worth of Iron and Nickel, enough to collapse the world economy several times over and again, that's just ONE asteroid.

Space is our future and companies like SpaceX and the America First movement is what's required to ensure chynah doesn't monopolize space for themselves.

3
Aambrick 3 points ago +3 / -0

You forget the Communist motto(okay one of them anyways):

Destroy that which you cannot control.

1
Nikola_S1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russia is flying old rockets

Angara is quite new, and it doesn't even matter whether they're old when they're cheap and reliable.

6
FuckReddit4545 6 points ago +6 / -0

If Biden doesn't screw it up

Oh he'll fuck it up royally. He'll simply say, these private sector goons would be no where without NASA. They got rich off the backs of tax payers, its time these companies paid their fair share. That's why I plan on taking these private rockets 100% on all profits. Come on man

4
LuckyStr1ke 4 points ago +4 / -0

That last “if” is a pretty big one. It’s more like an Obama “if if if if if if if if if if if if.”

5
Joes_Hippocampus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sneak-peek at Disney's new Star Wars movie.

2
MakeFloridaRed 2 points ago +2 / -0

It needs to crash and burn a lot bigger than that to be a Disney SW film these days.

3
dougkeenan [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

kek

3
FartyMcFartFace 3 points ago +3 / -0

well that didn't go well

18
SCP0073 18 points ago +19 / -1

It went very well. It was a flight test, not a landing test.

5
FartyMcFartFace 5 points ago +5 / -0

I stand better informed

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re fine :) didn’t want to sound mean, this test was to get the rocket horizontal and then back upright. The first half of that went well lol

4
Johnfox13 4 points ago +4 / -0

1940’s Japan pilots and 2001 Saudi Arabians entered the chat

8
webthing 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think they wanted to land it also.

3
wins_bigly 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm glad you're looking on the bright side

1
SCP0073 1 point ago +1 / -0

Defeatism is a self fulfilling prophecy. Can’t let it win, my folks.

16
Eclectus13 16 points ago +16 / -0

Space is hard...No shame here. Just the audacity to even try is a remarkable accomplishment. Carry on SpaceX. You'll stick the next one.

11
ObamasLooseButthole 11 points ago +11 / -0

SN10 will be the golden one, just watch.

Can't wait for How not to land a rocket: Part 2

5
EnforcerDesu 5 points ago +5 / -0

Probably SN15. New tech so they scrapped 11-14.

1
ObamasLooseButthole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, didn't know that. I need to get back into watching them like I used to.

7
CovfefeVideo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Please be the new Air Force 1...

1
LibertyontheRock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would you Ride it?

4
MAGAMAN4EVA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll wait for SN13 to buy a seat.

1
LibertyontheRock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that is a lucky number!

-18
deleted -18 points ago +3 / -21
12
Based_psychologist 12 points ago +12 / -0

What are you talking about? This is a video of the Biden administration.

-11
excaliboor -11 points ago +2 / -13

I don't see him losing any day and he's still in office. The only losers are the American people for letting a criminal rule the country. Fucking pathetic.

16
Sorosis 16 points ago +16 / -0

This forum is about America. Space is critical for the future. No one is asking you to suck Musk's knob.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
6
PB_Mack 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hell...even Trump had to work with the swamp to get good things done.

4
Based_psychologist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Opinions vary on him. To be honest I don’t fully trust him… There are people who are worse and right now his purposes align with ours, but it stay that way? I don’t know. And neither do though you’re entitled to your opinion... as are the people who like him.

2
Sorosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not seeing support for him though. At least not in this post.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
PB_Mack 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oops

5
Data 5 points ago +5 / -0

Turns out rockets are hard and landing them is even harder.

8
PB_Mack 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s actually on a sliding scale from easy to hard. Depends on how much rocket you want left after the landing.

6
Sorosis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Directed by Michael Bay.

3
Hedonismbot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks safe enough.

5
Jonny 5 points ago +6 / -1

I’d say this was a successful test. Now they know what not to do next time!

2
MagicMlke 2 points ago +3 / -1

That looks way too much like a giant, fat cock. I can't stand this toxic masculinity! Reeeee!!!

Seriously, cool launch, tho. Was it supposed to crash and blow up at the end?

3
MisterGuapo 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol...my response to that anatomic shape of the rocket is, "If it was shaped like female genitals, it wouldn't be very aerodynamic."

No, it wasn't supposed to crash and blow up, but it's not unexpected because this the second real flight and they had a pressurization issue on the last flight. This flight included a potential fix, but it doesn't appear to have worked (or something else happened).

5
RealStickFigure 5 points ago +5 / -0

“Work on that landing a little bit

13
stonepony 13 points ago +13 / -0

Excuse me sir. It's black history month. But you're posting videos of a white African American and his space company tests?

It would be more appropriate to post videos of Somali and Zimbabwean space industry efforts.

You're Hitler.

5
SnowflakeJuice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Elon Musk is African, so it's all good

1
Based_psychologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Not black enough to not be racist. You ain’t black,” says the racist.

4
JudicialDredd 4 points ago +4 / -0

He was such a good doggo...

13
Rebeltrooper09 13 points ago +13 / -0

Okay I am seeing A LOT of people that have many misconceptions about how Starship is supposed to work...

Here is a great video from Everyday Astronaut that should answer a lot of questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8p2JDTd13k

2
iSignedUpForThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very good video!

5
Rebeltrooper09 5 points ago +5 / -0

and here is one comparing Starship to NASA's SLS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA69Oh3_obY

3
LostSailor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did he say liquid nothing lol

12
Rebeltrooper09 12 points ago +12 / -0

flying grain silo go BOOOOM!!!!

1
Jackhererer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a pig crap silo belonging to homer j Simpson thank you very much.

7
Heywood_Jablowme 7 points ago +7 / -0

So close.

22
AlcoholicRetard 22 points ago +23 / -1

Why it looks like a giant...

5
labajada 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know Brain, but pencils don't fly.

18
Licensetomeme 18 points ago +18 / -0

Johnson! What is that? It kinda reminds me of a.....

14
Catholicpede 14 points ago +14 / -0

Dick....Get in here, you that thing is shaped like a.....

11
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 11 points ago +11 / -0

Willie...look at that thing up there it looks just like a big old...

10
Shakakka99 10 points ago +10 / -0

Pecker! Wait, that's not a woodpecker. It looks like someone's...

8
infowarlord 8 points ago +8 / -0

Privates! We have reports of an unidentified flying object. It looks like a long smooth shaft complete with...

4
kornesque 4 points ago +4 / -0

Testes,1, 2, 3, testicles. Roger, I have you the same.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

More like One Hung Lo

2
HoLeeFuk 2 points ago +4 / -2

Looks like they need to give it more time to transition for landing. If it had just a few more feet it would have finished the transition and had time to stabilize.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
9
jslenterprises 9 points ago +9 / -0

they need to switch to vertical using thrusters much higher up, rather than reignite main engines mid way through the swing. that caused the over-swing, and the failure of reignition.

No freefall momentum lost, and a belly flop into the desert sand.

Played Kerbal enough to know that at least.

1
HiddenDekuScrub 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so at least I wasn't the only person who thought "belly flop" at the end there.

2
Based_psychologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was about to call you out for Kerbalogy, but you outed yourself.

3
SOL170 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saying its a header tank issue possibly, same as last time, having timing issues lighting from those tanks after free fall.

7
Slothboy 7 points ago +7 / -0

The second engine failed to relight, so momentum was the killer.

1
HoLeeFuk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I completely missed that. So it probably would have nailed the landing if that engine stayed lit. Maybe they should just go with all 3 during landing for redundancy.

2
Slothboy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Third time's the charm maybe

8
Keep_on_winning_kag 8 points ago +9 / -1

Cool looking rocket. Has that 60's science fiction look.

2
SOL170 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s stainless steel, good thermal and structural qualities. The finished product is projected to have tiles covering it, giving it a much more synthetic look.

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tiles on the side that will hit the atmosphere.

2
223_Liberty_Tree 2 points ago +2 / -0

your moms fat booty about to hit the atmosphere

5
Sea_Still 5 points ago +6 / -1

Another Kaboom! Great flight for a while though

5
ghost_of_aswartz 5 points ago +5 / -0

I am not sure why but I cried when it blew up

6
ghost_of_aswartz 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know that failure is just part of the process

but I know how much people put into a project like this :(

2
Timesup 2 points ago +3 / -1

They didn't fail. This is testing. They got their data and they'll improve the landing process. Since they did get the data, it was a success!

6
Slothboy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't feel bad. They don't! This is part of the process.

They got lots of great data.

8
CyberMagaUnderground 8 points ago +8 / -0

One of the engines did not fire when it was returning to verticle position. If its just one of the engines, that is a good thing, because those are modular, they can be fixed quickly.

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems like they fired too late too. Perhaps the one engine makes all that difference but they seemed to fire and then just a split second later the rocket hit the ground.

4
Rebeltrooper09 4 points ago +4 / -0

they fired on time, we thought the same thing with SN8. the problem here was that because the 2nd engine didn't relight it didn't have enough thrust to counter act the rotation.

4
TankedCommandeerer 4 points ago +4 / -0

I noticed that too. They'll need to add some check that fires them at low thrust just to verify function and then switch to the reserve engine if one fails to light.

10
PensivePatriot 10 points ago +12 / -2

How do you teach a single rocket to land itself?

You crash about a dozen of them along the way.

A sad, but very common outcome for SpaceX; a milestone in and of itself in a way.

Welcome to the SpaceX family Starship :)

3
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want to see a supercut with yackety sax

2
2
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck, yes, exactly like that. Appreciate you fren. Thanks for the link.

1
knightofday 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. Blow up or it it’s progress for sure.

11
LiskaEman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Well that's just fun to watch! Not as emotion inducing as the first run of Falcon Heavy with Starman and the Tesla on board, but still! Very cool

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
LiskaEman 6 points ago +6 / -0

It never gets old! and, heaven help me, if ever DOES get old then shame on me!

USA! USA! USA! USA!

That must have been amazing to experience; probably more so during Apollo than now. But perhaps it comes sort of close.

4
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty impressive, just need to work out the issues with landing it.

2
Spawnlingman 2 points ago +2 / -0

:D

2
Ed_Ward 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was "landing" like that part of the test?

5
CyclopticErotica 5 points ago +6 / -1

yes, they push to failure then improve.

4
dougkeenan [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

well yes if part of the test is two engines coming back online to return the vehicle to vertical

when only one does? fresh crater

4
whybag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, looked like the second engine just fizzled a bit.

6
Pleb 6 points ago +6 / -0

GME stonk today.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0