An important point made in the doc is that there is no one specific charge but rather a range of charges and they are not itemized but are merely stated.
This means that if someone votes yes they could be voting for one point among many that they did not feel called for a yes vote. This dump of charges is also in violation of the constitution.
I think we should have any congress member who is an attorney and who contributed to this document disbarred. I am beyond tired of these people.
Bear in mind, what I wrote was nothing more than my unfiltered opinion. It's just my opinion that it if lawmakers literally cited "we don't like him" as the reason for impeachment rather than claim Trump's language alone was an impeachable offense, they would have a much more constitutionally valid impeachment than the one they are pushing for now.
Thank you, that is really good to know.
An important point made in the doc is that there is no one specific charge but rather a range of charges and they are not itemized but are merely stated.
This means that if someone votes yes they could be voting for one point among many that they did not feel called for a yes vote. This dump of charges is also in violation of the constitution.
I think we should have any congress member who is an attorney and who contributed to this document disbarred. I am beyond tired of these people.
Bear in mind, what I wrote was nothing more than my unfiltered opinion. It's just my opinion that it if lawmakers literally cited "we don't like him" as the reason for impeachment rather than claim Trump's language alone was an impeachable offense, they would have a much more constitutionally valid impeachment than the one they are pushing for now.
I agree; and I am fine with opinions and happily offer my own :)