3441
Comments (212)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
Independenceforever 37 points ago +37 / -0

WTF is this like inverse capitalism where they're trying to compete to fail the worst?

Welcome to the middle ages. Please Renaissance fast.

15
alfredbester 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is the real question.

Why do they do it? We need to look at it like a puzzle, or a question on an intelligence test. Examine who benefits from the results of their actions. Why do they continue on this path en masse when clearly it is costing them in ratings and (presumably) money. Why do the corporate sponsors alienate middle income working Americans?

19
VirPopulus 19 points ago +19 / -0

My guess would be that there's much more money offered to them by the hidden hands than an honest audience could ever generate. Stay mum on election-fraud talk and guide the narrative in a slight way, and get your entire life paid for by those who run the money presses.

That, or the letter agencies are strong-arming the news orgs and possibly threatening their safety. Most likely though, the news orgs ARE the letter agencies.

3
ViolettFem 3 points ago +3 / -0

No...I watched Sean Spicer in a 4 way YT video 2 wks ago

  • Newsmax is being threatened to be removed from Cable tv altogether... THAT is what they're afraid of. Spicer said "yes I'm afraid". This was right after Parler was being yanked and whole platforms removed.

When you have that fear, you will do what they're doing to Lindell but they've only become FOX NEWS REHEATED... we left Fox for doing this & when they do it, why stay there? They aren't a "better" alternative at that point - Fox is actually more entertaining with better hosts if you want to get honest about it.

I wished more to go to OAN - but they really do need to amp up their news format. It's practically lifeless zombies with good info. They need more guests, interviews,...