Why do they do it? We need to look at it like a puzzle, or a question on an intelligence test. Examine who benefits from the results of their actions. Why do they continue on this path en masse when clearly it is costing them in ratings and (presumably) money. Why do the corporate sponsors alienate middle income working Americans?
It's not because they don't know they can profit from staying MAGA. It's that they're bullied into not doing it by the higher ups that run Fox and Newsmax. OANN is the only network that hasn't been bullied into doing so.
They feel vulnerable to being removed as a Cable network/ alt to Fox.
Everything is unstable now since Parler was removed like it was.
Parler was removed becuz of where they were hosted - Newsmax apparently is vulnerable the same way.
So they end up bowing out when the wrong topic comes up.
This country is in friggin free fall
WTF is this like inverse capitalism where they're trying to compete to fail the worst?
Welcome to the middle ages. Please Renaissance fast.
This is the real question.
Why do they do it? We need to look at it like a puzzle, or a question on an intelligence test. Examine who benefits from the results of their actions. Why do they continue on this path en masse when clearly it is costing them in ratings and (presumably) money. Why do the corporate sponsors alienate middle income working Americans?
It's not because they don't know they can profit from staying MAGA. It's that they're bullied into not doing it by the higher ups that run Fox and Newsmax. OANN is the only network that hasn't been bullied into doing so.
They feel vulnerable to being removed as a Cable network/ alt to Fox. Everything is unstable now since Parler was removed like it was.
Parler was removed becuz of where they were hosted - Newsmax apparently is vulnerable the same way. So they end up bowing out when the wrong topic comes up. This country is in friggin free fall