2968
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
19
RichardNoggin 19 points ago +24 / -5

Shoulders wider than hips, the telltale sign of a liberal "woman".

1
Eatinglue 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don’t understand our team’s obsession with a “breeding material” physical stereotype. If she does it for me and she’s not a libtard, I might have a go at her.

The pressure to “breed that woman” is fucking annoying. I’m 34, but I’m not dad material. I’ve been married twice to fairly decent women, but modern women...are good at sucking but they suck at being good partners. Plus divorce laws are a massive gamble...I got lucky. Can I just support the cause without the “PUT SEVEN BABIEEEE IN HER” attitude.

3
ronnietherocket 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with you that not every woman needs to be a drop dead gorgeous babe to be a public figure.

The only time I'm really okay going after a woman because of her looks is when they high praise as being beautiful/elegant/etc. E.g., Michelle Obama.

But for Jen Psaki, I don't get it. Noone is (to my knowledge) parading her around as a super attractive babe. That said, to be honest, she is fairly attractive (physically).

I'm also curious which women the men on this forum are dating. I doubt more than a handful are dating supermodels.

3
TeaPahrTay 3 points ago +3 / -0

I support the appearance criticism because the Left did it for 5 years to Melania, Ivanka, Calloway, McKenanny, etc. So now we get to do it and we got sooooo much more material to work with (as in actually mass, most of the time).

But for real she's not the worst. I'd ask her out if the options were thinning.