“I’m sure you’ve received a lot of emails about the interview with mike lindel. And rightfully so. You asked a guest a question about censorship, muted him, then ended the interview. It was the epitome of disgraceful. You are not news. You are propaganda and you have to sloppily shut down shows when you lose control of the narrative. People see right through this. It’s embarrassing.
I’d suggest firing sellers immediately for his egregious unprofessionalism, but it’s not going to bring my business back. I’m not one to change my trusted sources around when I disagree with them-I stop trusting sources when they attempt to steer the truth wherever they want and you did so blatantly. Why even have mike on your show if you’re going to yell over him? The irony of that interview focusing on censorship makes you a laughing stock. But hey, CNN is still in business so maybe you’ll have enough low IQ viewers to stay afloat too.“
"I had high hopes for Newsmax. I had hoped that Newsmax, at the very least, would have integrity and honesty in the news.
Your anchor's treatment of Mike Lindell, who was a guest on your program, was atrocious. It is one thing to allow a guest to comment, then attempt to clarify the stations standing on that point if it differs, and allowing the guest to continue. It is another for your anchor to act like a child, yell over the guest, and then demand that producers cut the segment short because the anchor is having a petulant temper tantrum. Highly disappointing.
Why would you invite a guest on to talk about censorship, only to attempt to censor the guest?
It's disgraceful and definitely not newsworthy. I wanted to believe that Newsmax had some ethics in a world of unethical reporting. Seems I was wrong.
Using the excuse that there is "no proof of fraud" is not enough. You have someone telling you there is proof that no one is looking at, and Newsmax, just like every other mainstream news network is trying to convince the people that "there's nothing to see here".
I expect an aired, sincere apology from the anchor for his treatment of a guest of the show. I expect Mike to be invited back on, and allowed to fully express himself. If it is not forthcoming I will be returning to OANN for all news commentary. I wanted to add a new voice to my daily news, but now I'm beginning to view Newsmax as the new CNN."
honestly, the apology won't be enough for me, but it's the right thing for them to do to attempt to salvage any semblance of a reputation.
Well worded. They dug their own grave. And sellers must be in deep shit regardless because he clearly doesn’t have the bullshitting skills that the CNN anchors have so he certainly won’t be of value to a fake news organization like newsmax
Emailed.
“I’m sure you’ve received a lot of emails about the interview with mike lindel. And rightfully so. You asked a guest a question about censorship, muted him, then ended the interview. It was the epitome of disgraceful. You are not news. You are propaganda and you have to sloppily shut down shows when you lose control of the narrative. People see right through this. It’s embarrassing.
I’d suggest firing sellers immediately for his egregious unprofessionalism, but it’s not going to bring my business back. I’m not one to change my trusted sources around when I disagree with them-I stop trusting sources when they attempt to steer the truth wherever they want and you did so blatantly. Why even have mike on your show if you’re going to yell over him? The irony of that interview focusing on censorship makes you a laughing stock. But hey, CNN is still in business so maybe you’ll have enough low IQ viewers to stay afloat too.“
Emailed also. My email.
"I had high hopes for Newsmax. I had hoped that Newsmax, at the very least, would have integrity and honesty in the news.
Your anchor's treatment of Mike Lindell, who was a guest on your program, was atrocious. It is one thing to allow a guest to comment, then attempt to clarify the stations standing on that point if it differs, and allowing the guest to continue. It is another for your anchor to act like a child, yell over the guest, and then demand that producers cut the segment short because the anchor is having a petulant temper tantrum. Highly disappointing.
Why would you invite a guest on to talk about censorship, only to attempt to censor the guest?
It's disgraceful and definitely not newsworthy. I wanted to believe that Newsmax had some ethics in a world of unethical reporting. Seems I was wrong. Using the excuse that there is "no proof of fraud" is not enough. You have someone telling you there is proof that no one is looking at, and Newsmax, just like every other mainstream news network is trying to convince the people that "there's nothing to see here".
I expect an aired, sincere apology from the anchor for his treatment of a guest of the show. I expect Mike to be invited back on, and allowed to fully express himself. If it is not forthcoming I will be returning to OANN for all news commentary. I wanted to add a new voice to my daily news, but now I'm beginning to view Newsmax as the new CNN."
honestly, the apology won't be enough for me, but it's the right thing for them to do to attempt to salvage any semblance of a reputation.
Well worded. They dug their own grave. And sellers must be in deep shit regardless because he clearly doesn’t have the bullshitting skills that the CNN anchors have so he certainly won’t be of value to a fake news organization like newsmax