Me too, I absolutely support voter ID. But your prior comment got me thinking, if voter ID is unconstitutional according to federal appeal courts (not SC as far as I know) then how do they get away with requiring Purchaser ID's and background checks for firearms?
That's a good question, the 2 positions are not consistent. I'd love to hear the mental gymnastics the courts would have to go through to explain it. I bet they'd use some case law instead of logic.
Me too, I absolutely support voter ID. But your prior comment got me thinking, if voter ID is unconstitutional according to federal appeal courts (not SC as far as I know) then how do they get away with requiring Purchaser ID's and background checks for firearms?
That's a good question, the 2 positions are not consistent. I'd love to hear the mental gymnastics the courts would have to go through to explain it. I bet they'd use some case law instead of logic.
Patriot Act if I remember correctly. They, also, passed or about to pass Patriot Act 2.0 with the full grace of the SWAMP.