The amount of debates I’ve had trying to red pill people over the last 10 years that end with the other side saying well that’s conspiracy theory is A LOT.
Throw at them a debunked conspiracy theory that they believed and likely still believe: RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Ask them if they ever entertained the idea of it, and if so, they're a conspiracy theorist.
Here is the big difference: there was never any evidence of Russian Collusion. They spent years and millions of tax dollars on trying to find the evidence, and the whole time the media threw it in our faces non stop.
Compare it to today. Election fraud has evidence. Real evidence. That is not disputed. What is disputed (by them) is if it's enough fraud to sway the election. Yet, no multi year, multi million dollars investigation this time. Why?
Throw at them a debunked conspiracy theory that they believed and likely still believe: RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Ask them if they ever entertained the idea of it, and if so, they're a conspiracy theorist.
Here is the big difference: there was never any evidence of Russian Collusion. They spent years and millions of tax dollars on trying to find the evidence, and the whole time the media threw it in our faces non stop.
Compare it to today. Election fraud has evidence. Real evidence. That is not disputed. What is disputed (by them) is if it's enough fraud to sway the election. Yet, no multi year, multi million dollars investigation this time. Why?