Idiot, we are trying to establish data on IF the vaccine is worse than the virus itself. That would be how you do it, and give you an idea of it's efficacy.
All independent sources. It would definitive, but don't you find it odd NO ONE is intrested, and we haven't spearheaded such an obvious source of data from the start.
I see that you are fighting the good fight here. If I were you I would have phrased this post differently because honestly a lot of people here are not patient enough with language and ideas to get over the initial impression that you seem to be promoting vax. One issue with your ideal vax data is that the data from the disease is heavily manipulated, so even if you get what you want then the vax damage has to be worse than inflated virus numbers which is a higher bar than the actual. It's still worth pursuing your data though as we need all the ammo we can get.
Idiot, we are trying to establish data on IF the vaccine is worse than the virus itself. That would be how you do it, and give you an idea of it's efficacy.
All independent sources. It would definitive, but don't you find it odd NO ONE is intrested, and we haven't spearheaded such an obvious source of data from the start.
I see that you are fighting the good fight here. If I were you I would have phrased this post differently because honestly a lot of people here are not patient enough with language and ideas to get over the initial impression that you seem to be promoting vax. One issue with your ideal vax data is that the data from the disease is heavily manipulated, so even if you get what you want then the vax damage has to be worse than inflated virus numbers which is a higher bar than the actual. It's still worth pursuing your data though as we need all the ammo we can get.