2916
Comments (101)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-4
Madpoli [S] -4 points ago +10 / -14

Newsmax, he's one of the good ones on there. He's kinda new on there.

23
horus_falke 23 points ago +27 / -4

If you think Sellers acted like that totally on his own accord, and not because it was what he was told by those running things at Newsmax, you're a fool.

This segment with Schmitt is so clearly an attempt to lure dopes back. They know people like you will see it and not write-off the network in whole because "at least Schmitt is on there."

Remember how things went with Carlson? He said many, many amazing things but in the end he cucked as hard as the rest.

ALL OF THE MEDIA IS AGAINST YOU. ALL OF IT. STOP THINKING ANY NETWORK OR PUBLICATION IS WORKING IN YOUR FAVOR, OR EVEN UNBIASED. THEY WANT TO CONTROL YOU AND YOU'RE ALL BUYING INTO IT.

8
Waffleyumboy 8 points ago +11 / -3

What is the fucking problem with watching a show? Fucking snowflakes on this website want to control what I do with my life. If I want to hear about election abnormalities, I'm gonna do it and screw you for cucking out and not supporting that kind of speech.

4
zekin 4 points ago +6 / -2

This guy is right. Sorry. It doesn't matter who the messenger is. The information has to come from somewhere and sometimes they package it better. Just watch the daily streams being posted by those temporary accounts with adblocker on. No ad revenue when they're spam accounts and you have an ad blocker and doesn't contribute to fox or Newsmax views. You also have to remember were in an information and propaganda war and you have to ask yourself would the opposition be happy that we are divided. Hell yes they are happy that our people are so divided theyre trying to run away from fox and Newsmax due to a few malactors. I still read bullshit CNN articles through archive.is to know what the opposition says.