4645
Comments (340)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
DeJustice 14 points ago +16 / -2

Whats funny, is how many people such as yourself thinks this. You actually think they are doing this for China to take over? No China is just a weapon the globalists use. China will not be a power after this, they are weak, and will always be weak due to their governing ways. Their people will always be undereducated, underfed, and weak. Which is why they are attempting the same thing here. Underfed, uneducated, weak people can't put up a fight.

16
Sl0re10 16 points ago +16 / -0

If we stay togeather we will become weaker and weaker. Example: Gender quotas and general lowering of standards in the military. Country half the size could field a better military than what we have going on now... if it only had high quality people.

4
DeJustice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, but we aren’t underfed. We still have millions of men that would utterly destroy China. We are not as small as them, as underfed, undereducated. That is the state of the majority of their men. Hell I saw a video of all their soldiers crying acting like straight up bitches. They are not a formable opponent. They are attacking the only way they can, economically and politically. This is not pre nuclear tech, there isn’t a single way America becomes second fiddle to anybody. However, there are many scenarios in which we are apart of the global movement and become the spearhead. This isn’t like Roman times, nukes have changed the game.

2
Sl0re10 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe you but my point is women, soy boys, over fed urbanites... most of whom do not exercise are a drag on our military. Example: Even if you have a female driving a vehicle is she going to be able to drag 220 pound men out if the vehicle gets hit... or what will happen if she is captured (the men will do stupid stuff to save her).

If your not a urbanite you may not see what I do... also; generally cultural conservatives do things for fun (hiking, shooting, et cetera) that are much less common in the general (re: blue / urban) culture.

As far as military strength the blue areas, with both their idealogy and human potential, they are a net negative. Imo

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

China's army has a "soy boy" problem of their own due to their one child policy. They call them "Little Emperors", a generation of entitled, lazy, and spoiled only-sons.

But ultimately China is not likely to ever put boots on US soil in the forseeable future, they just don't have the logistics capability and aren't building it out.

4
Snoman 4 points ago +4 / -0

That used to be true, but Chyyna has grown a large middle class as their manufacturing has increased. My opinion is that the globalist plan will be to utilize the CCP as the world police force given their surveillance tactics and the military their currently building

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0