She's one of if not the most prolific liars out there. She literally says anything for personal gain. She lied about her race for thirty years to get affirmative action positions.
I'd give her a break on the native question and put the blame more on others that don't understand indian governments. which isn't about blood but rather whether you have an ancestor on the dawes roll and you are an active citizen of the (socialist-esque) nation (bands, tribes). most registered indians you probably wouldn't be able to id as indians.. lot of mormon looking indians out here. the easiest way to tell the legit from the non legit. the non legit are more interested in being indian. but what the whole fauxahontas scene teaches us is that the colleges and universities are corrupt as seemingly the rest of us would have to prove our dual citizenship. All in all, they were likely looking at the mixed stats of the "progressive stack" https://youtu.be/n1tFbZ5kaY8?t=115 it was an exploit in the system. I think most people would abuse in this age of superficial identity politics it but yeah, I guess someone in a position of moral authority should have known better.
>Warren’s crackdown on elite charter schools would leave elite private schools like Kirby Hall (the charter school she sent her kid to) unscathed, while greatly eliminating charter schools as a parallel option for lower-income families.
Lies right to the face of a innocent black mother trying to help black kids escape the hell that is the failing public school system. Shameful. For those of you who haven't been perma banned from twitter you should definitely clip this video and attach it to w/e BPT hashtag is trending daily from now until the election.
From the daily caller article about it (Kirby Hall is the charter school she sent her kid to):
>Warren’s crackdown on elite charter schools would leave elite private schools like Kirby Hall unscathed, while greatly eliminating charter schools as a parallel option for lower-income families.
Like she’s going to tell parents they’re only allowed to send their kids to public schools?
Yep. Private magnet schools would be illegal. But to make it "fair," you can live anywhere and send your kids to any school anywhere, regardless of boundaries. Source: Warren website
Where I live in Ohio, school funding is based on your property taxes. A specific percentage of the property taxes go to the local school district. Every year, there is a vote that we are allowed to raise our property taxes for schools, and the amount they are raised by go directly to the school. This specific part of property tax only goes to the school and any raise of this part of property tax will only go to schools.
So how does school funding work with the system you are talking about? Is it the same percentage of property tax for the whole state that goes to schools for the whole state? Do counties have the same yearly vote to raise property tax to fund schools more? If so, why would people ever want to vote for that tax increase if the funding is distributed across the whole state instead of directly given to the school your child will be going to?
"School choice" drives me crazy. Gov't schools in my county are re-districting. Parents are up in arms that their kids will be divided (one new school... 3 overcrowding, some charters up for renewal).
People... if the government runs the schools, you have no choice. You may be granted an appeal, or successfully sue... but you have ZERO CHOICE. Further, you have zero influence on the curriculum.
Private (well vetted first), then hybrid home school, then home school. Find a way to get your kids out of government run schools.
I do think there is a very important aspect to going to school with other students that home school can't give a child. It isn't what they teach, but the socialization with other people that a child learns. I also think it is extremely important for children to learn this while young and still developing.
While at school with other kids, children learn things like, how do I make friends, how do I talk to strangers, how do I deal with assholes, how to I ask for help, how to I be assertive, how to I stand up for myself, how do I figure out things on my own, how do I deal with peer pressure, how do I talk to someone I am attracted to, how to I act when I am uncomfortable, how do I deal with rejection, how to I deal with failure, as well as other aspects of socialization.
There is no doubt in my mind that homeschooling is far better for children at teaching them book smarts, but I believe it leaves them lacking at many other aspects of growing up. I know that homeschooling parents will try to do things like meetups with other homeschooling parents, but you just can't get the same thing without a child going to a school with other students.
Every single homeschooled child I have ever met has been quiet, shy, and awkward, but they are also some of the best educated children I have ever seen. A hybrid of homeschool and school with other kids sounds good depending on what that means.
What one of my friends did was she homeschooled her child until 8th grade and then sent him to a school with other students so he could learn to socialize with other kids. Another friend had her kid in school 3 days per week and homeschool the other two days until high school in which her kid went to school full time with a couple hours of homeschool after school most days to keep up on education. I don't know what type of system or what type of hybrid is best, I just believe that while homeschool might be the best education, there are things a child can't learn being homeschooled and need to go to school with other students to learn.
Public schools: tons of "socialization" and ZERO control of curriculum
Private schools: tons of socialization, control of curriculum (by choosing the right school) but big $$.
Hybrid: best of all of the above and some $$
Home school: minimal socialization, minimal cost, complete control of curriculum.
I'd just like to see some objective research that "socialization" is a real concern (for the typical suburban homeschooler - not the hermit types living in isolation).
“The latest lie she told is the Biden type, a reimagining of history to bolster her résumé and personal story.
...This gets to the Orwellian liberal definition of a lie. President Donald Trump is routinely called a liar by the media-Democrat establishment, but if you scan the long list of lies attributed to him on PolitiFact, it quickly becomes apparent that a Republican lie is nothing more than a statement that is damaging to Democrats. The more damaging the statement, the louder it is decried a lie.
Liberals have a very different standard they apply to Democrats. Because Warren's story could have been true of some people, it is technically true in the liberal hive mind, even if demonstrably false. This is the standard they also routinely apply to the plague of fake hate crimes, which makes the Cherokee princess the Jussie Smollett of the Democrat primary.
Warren tells at least three kinds of lies: the Joe Biden résumé-building special; the absurdist "first woman of color" whopper; and the vicious slander, which is the worst type. Her latest gem fits into both the résumé-builder and slander categories, although this slander is not as vicious as her last attempt.
Two short months ago, this vile maiden tweeted out that "5 years ago Michael Brown was murdered by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri." That is not only a lie, but a horrible smear of a man who serves and protects Americans.
Darren Wilson did not murder Michael Brown.
Warren's noxious play here was obvious. Warren is performing wretchedly among black Americans and decided that lying to them would help build that support.”
And the hypocrisy will sail right over their heads. Every limousine liberal sends their kids off to some elite private school, yet demands we all send our kids to public.
She's one of if not the most prolific liars out there. She literally says anything for personal gain. She lied about her race for thirty years to get affirmative action positions.
She is total trash and has no character, she rivals Hillary in her ability to lie without hesitation while knowing it is easy to prove untrue.
I'd give her a break on the native question and put the blame more on others that don't understand indian governments. which isn't about blood but rather whether you have an ancestor on the dawes roll and you are an active citizen of the (socialist-esque) nation (bands, tribes). most registered indians you probably wouldn't be able to id as indians.. lot of mormon looking indians out here. the easiest way to tell the legit from the non legit. the non legit are more interested in being indian. but what the whole fauxahontas scene teaches us is that the colleges and universities are corrupt as seemingly the rest of us would have to prove our dual citizenship. All in all, they were likely looking at the mixed stats of the "progressive stack" https://youtu.be/n1tFbZ5kaY8?t=115 it was an exploit in the system. I think most people would abuse in this age of superficial identity politics it but yeah, I guess someone in a position of moral authority should have known better.
Source: https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/29/elizabeth-warren-charter-schools-son-private-school/
My favorite part of the article:
>Warren’s crackdown on elite charter schools would leave elite private schools like Kirby Hall (the charter school she sent her kid to) unscathed, while greatly eliminating charter schools as a parallel option for lower-income families.
Washington Compost working doubletime damage control on this one lmao
Why is her kid in Austin? Gtfo
Curious about this too.
Warren was teaching at a nearby university.
From the daily caller article:
>That coincides with Warren’s final year teaching at the University of Texas at Austin, which is located a short drive from Kirby Hall.
I'm shocked. Shocked!
Well, not that shocked.
The child is 50. He keeps getting held back in the 11th grade. Girl troubles mostly.
Austin, TX? Isn't she a senator from Massachusetts?
She's 70 years old. Her kid was in 5th grade in 1990, when they lived in Texas.
The Teacher's Union doesn't care that she's an Indian so she has to tell them she's against school choice.
Lies right to the face of a innocent black mother trying to help black kids escape the hell that is the failing public school system. Shameful. For those of you who haven't been perma banned from twitter you should definitely clip this video and attach it to w/e BPT hashtag is trending daily from now until the election.
From the daily caller article about it (Kirby Hall is the charter school she sent her kid to):
>Warren’s crackdown on elite charter schools would leave elite private schools like Kirby Hall unscathed, while greatly eliminating charter schools as a parallel option for lower-income families.
Like she’s going to tell parents they’re only allowed to send their kids to public schools?
Yep. Private magnet schools would be illegal. But to make it "fair," you can live anywhere and send your kids to any school anywhere, regardless of boundaries. Source: Warren website
Where I live in Ohio, school funding is based on your property taxes. A specific percentage of the property taxes go to the local school district. Every year, there is a vote that we are allowed to raise our property taxes for schools, and the amount they are raised by go directly to the school. This specific part of property tax only goes to the school and any raise of this part of property tax will only go to schools.
So how does school funding work with the system you are talking about? Is it the same percentage of property tax for the whole state that goes to schools for the whole state? Do counties have the same yearly vote to raise property tax to fund schools more? If so, why would people ever want to vote for that tax increase if the funding is distributed across the whole state instead of directly given to the school your child will be going to?
"School choice" drives me crazy. Gov't schools in my county are re-districting. Parents are up in arms that their kids will be divided (one new school... 3 overcrowding, some charters up for renewal).
People... if the government runs the schools, you have no choice. You may be granted an appeal, or successfully sue... but you have ZERO CHOICE. Further, you have zero influence on the curriculum.
Private (well vetted first), then hybrid home school, then home school. Find a way to get your kids out of government run schools.
I do think there is a very important aspect to going to school with other students that home school can't give a child. It isn't what they teach, but the socialization with other people that a child learns. I also think it is extremely important for children to learn this while young and still developing.
While at school with other kids, children learn things like, how do I make friends, how do I talk to strangers, how do I deal with assholes, how to I ask for help, how to I be assertive, how to I stand up for myself, how do I figure out things on my own, how do I deal with peer pressure, how do I talk to someone I am attracted to, how to I act when I am uncomfortable, how do I deal with rejection, how to I deal with failure, as well as other aspects of socialization.
There is no doubt in my mind that homeschooling is far better for children at teaching them book smarts, but I believe it leaves them lacking at many other aspects of growing up. I know that homeschooling parents will try to do things like meetups with other homeschooling parents, but you just can't get the same thing without a child going to a school with other students.
Every single homeschooled child I have ever met has been quiet, shy, and awkward, but they are also some of the best educated children I have ever seen. A hybrid of homeschool and school with other kids sounds good depending on what that means.
What one of my friends did was she homeschooled her child until 8th grade and then sent him to a school with other students so he could learn to socialize with other kids. Another friend had her kid in school 3 days per week and homeschool the other two days until high school in which her kid went to school full time with a couple hours of homeschool after school most days to keep up on education. I don't know what type of system or what type of hybrid is best, I just believe that while homeschool might be the best education, there are things a child can't learn being homeschooled and need to go to school with other students to learn.
So, we agree on a hybrid model.
Public schools: tons of "socialization" and ZERO control of curriculum
Private schools: tons of socialization, control of curriculum (by choosing the right school) but big $$.
Hybrid: best of all of the above and some $$
Home school: minimal socialization, minimal cost, complete control of curriculum.
I'd just like to see some objective research that "socialization" is a real concern (for the typical suburban homeschooler - not the hermit types living in isolation).
When was this? I went to public school too, in TX in the 80s. The curriculum is different now/ last 10 years.
As a moderator of politics, i can tell you Warren never lies, because only paleface lie, and she is native American to the core.
Indelible in the hippocampus is the smell of wampum when Warren raped me in the 80s.
Just when lying about her race wasn't bad enough she doubled down and lied about her own children. What a great example she'd be for the youth. /s
She has dupers delight most of the time. Crazy woman.
“The latest lie she told is the Biden type, a reimagining of history to bolster her résumé and personal story.
...This gets to the Orwellian liberal definition of a lie. President Donald Trump is routinely called a liar by the media-Democrat establishment, but if you scan the long list of lies attributed to him on PolitiFact, it quickly becomes apparent that a Republican lie is nothing more than a statement that is damaging to Democrats. The more damaging the statement, the louder it is decried a lie.
Liberals have a very different standard they apply to Democrats. Because Warren's story could have been true of some people, it is technically true in the liberal hive mind, even if demonstrably false. This is the standard they also routinely apply to the plague of fake hate crimes, which makes the Cherokee princess the Jussie Smollett of the Democrat primary.
Warren tells at least three kinds of lies: the Joe Biden résumé-building special; the absurdist "first woman of color" whopper; and the vicious slander, which is the worst type. Her latest gem fits into both the résumé-builder and slander categories, although this slander is not as vicious as her last attempt.
Two short months ago, this vile maiden tweeted out that "5 years ago Michael Brown was murdered by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri." That is not only a lie, but a horrible smear of a man who serves and protects Americans. Darren Wilson did not murder Michael Brown.
Warren's noxious play here was obvious. Warren is performing wretchedly among black Americans and decided that lying to them would help build that support.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/10/elizabeth_warren_leading_liar_in_the_party_of_liars.html
Disgusting old hag
And the hypocrisy will sail right over their heads. Every limousine liberal sends their kids off to some elite private school, yet demands we all send our kids to public.
Fucking white male, questioning her patriotism. Sickening. This women is an indigenous patriarch.
Waiting for MSNBCABCCBSCNNESPN ticker to pass right now with charges of racism just for questioning facts.
This has always been fascinating to me. How democrats get away with telling people they're for the little guy is unreal to me.
Real news would be "Warren caught telling the truth on camera."
ANOTHER LYING DEM-O =RAT
For a second I thought Warren was in the thumbnail and was pulling a Justin Tredeau.
It's what I've come to expect from Liawatha.
Great song for Pocahontas: Why you fuckin lying? -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcWM_1hBu_c