1522
Comments (38)
sorted by:
88
sloppyjobmossad 88 points ago +89 / -1

BREAKING NEWS: el chapo files for NH primary. immediately released from federal custody

9
OrangeManRad 9 points ago +9 / -0

Of course he's running as a Democrat, That's his base!

65
MAGA 65 points ago +65 / -0

I do not accept that crimes cannot be investigated and lies can be told just because you are a democrat.

35
FREN 35 points ago +36 / -1

So you're the one who got the "MAGA" username... jealous!

12
philandy 12 points ago +12 / -0

Maybe KAG or KAGA is available there, FREN?

1
Lavender_Blue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or perhaps MAGA17? Or, if all else fails, something like MAGA2679.5 (the numbers are random).

5
MAGADUDE 5 points ago +5 / -0

And someone else grabbed MAGAMAN

2
MAGA_MAN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I tried that as well bud had to settle for this.

12
menardo3 12 points ago +12 / -0

I do not accept that crimes can not be investigated and you can continue sniffing kids just because you’re a potential weak political opponent who is a massive criminal.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
OhLollyLollyPop 7 points ago +7 / -0

There were those little Chao family girls, tho. I guess Asian is ok?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
8
JoeB 8 points ago +8 / -0

The one with Senator Daines' 6 year old (grandaughter?) is the absolute, in your face example of public molestation to be seen anywhere.

This is the incident where the young girl - wearing a red skirt and black top - steps away from Creepy Joe and sharply elbows him in the crotch. This after he blatantly slides his hand onto her right breast area.

I do not understand how ANYONE with working eyesight cannot recognize this as anything other than a grotesque sexual assault upon a child.

4
Razeontherock 4 points ago +4 / -0

I missed that but WOW! And good for her, lol. Did sleepy creepy Joe fall to the floor? (Notice I am NOT inciting violence, merely learning about a past event with an interest towards social justice

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
Kekistani_National 15 points ago +15 / -0

Of course you can't investigate me for changing ballots, I'm running for office. What are you, some kind of Putin-loving fascistic dictator?

13
MaxineWaters4Prez 13 points ago +13 / -0

Especially since they've been doing exactly that since president Trump began his campaign.

13
EpsteinMurdered 13 points ago +13 / -0

Since The GodEmperor is running for re election. The impeachment investigation is DOUBLE Bullshit

12
JordansJacket 12 points ago +12 / -0

If you're running, might run, or formerly held office are the rules for investigating Democrats.

11
choobster 11 points ago +11 / -0

It sucks because Trump is also running for office and they haven't given him a break in years

10
Harambe 10 points ago +10 / -0

They have been investigating Trump nonstop. We have to elect them to be able to investigate them? Honk honk

10
Hadrian 10 points ago +10 / -0

Completely agree—they’re implicitly asking the American people to accept that a Democrat politician and his son can commit crimes in Ukraine and a Republican President can’t investigate because the investigation itself would be a “crime” since that particular Democrat happens to be running for office. That is totally and completely unacceptable in the United States, we absolutely should not give an inch on this.

9
Thor-Loki-1 9 points ago +9 / -0

So, just how free is the speech here?

14
menardo3 14 points ago +14 / -0

Very free.

Just don’t:

Be racist Break the Law Dox People

And whatever else the sidebar says. If you’re on desktop, the rules are on the right. If you’re on mobile, they’ll show up if you click the circle with the exclamation mark on the top right of the page.

KAG!

13
papaMAGA 13 points ago +14 / -1

It’s free so long as you don’t make our community look bad by universally denounced speech. Like actual racism and actual violence and actual doxing.

Don’t abuse it, we have something good going here.

1
Thor-Loki-1 1 point ago +1 / -0

EDIT (Can't seem to do the original):

So, not exactly Free Speech. It's what I call "Conversational Free Speech", which is what I'd say out in public. I understand the reasoning, but this is not Voat or the Chans, as an example.

The Rules to the Right specify what's allowed....

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
Razeontherock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excuse me that's creepy sleepy Joe Bribem ;)

8
f_bastiat 8 points ago +8 / -0

Its funny (its not), because it really seems like thats what happened to trump, and is happening to him again during his reelection.

7
Antenna 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why do ya think there were 25 (+?) people running?!? A criminal's gotta do what a criminal's gotta do.

5
HumbleMemeFarmer 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s 90% of why Dems run in the first place.

5
YDS2016 5 points ago +5 / -0

BREAKING NEWS: Donald J Trump is also running for president.

4
jarvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's OK for Obama's administration to use the IRS, the CIA and the FBI to go after an opposing candidate with the full force of the US intelligence apparatus, and utilizing Europeam government spy capabilities, though.

Hypocritical fucks, the lot of them.

3
meepstone 3 points ago +3 / -0

That logic goes out the window when you point out to anyone saying this that Democrats have been investigating Trump non stop since 2016 before the election and still ongoing right now...

3
4moreyears 3 points ago +3 / -0

Running for office is even more reason to be investigated. It's called vetting.

2
Hibakusha 2 points ago +2 / -0

i mean, neither to do they, unless the individual is a democrat

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Notice that the premise only applies to Democrat though, because they were perfectly fine with investigating Trump when he was a candidate.

1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Democrats are pushing the goal post so far, it's in China right now.