I'm not into the Q stuff but a close friend of mine is, actually was the one who showed me TD But he asked me why I think Q is controlled opposition "Well, to keep us complacent and nonviolent. To keep us fighting each other" his responded to me with: "If it was controlled opposition, why would they tell us about their own crimes and not direct us at each other. That's what they've done with Identitarianism, Racism, and all that. Why would they put the focus on themselves? Why would they red pill us if it was just controlled opposition" And I can come up with a few theoretical reasons. Hastening destabilization, Worsening the fighting, demoraliztion, etc. But I'm not going to lie, it does seem odd that they would intentionally shed the veil. I guess I'm bothered that I don't have a confident answer to it I just wanted to share that as it's been on my mind since
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Just thinking out loud here--Maybe it started out like Antifa. A useful tool that the Democrats could wield against the right with no blowback. But like Antifa once released out into the world the Democrats could no longer control it. Then it started to turn against them. Unlike other controlled ops Q gives hope instead of fear. Like the saying goes you can catch more bees with honey than with vinegar. A honey trap is still a trap.
Yeah, I thought about that same point. But it just... It's that feeling you get when your own answer just doesn't quite sit right, y'know?
Its possible that's it, but it just feels off
and I'm really not typically someone who is bothered by an answer if it works logically and isn't impossible