41
Comments (9)
sorted by:
6
ZGR81 6 points ago +6 / -0

I assume the shredding company knows what they were shredding. Has anyone called them? Probably not. I do remember seeing video of the shredding company trucks outside of the stadium where they were counting ballots.

1
SliceOFriedGold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, the shredding company van was an FBI van in disguise

1
Xysten 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they used civilians for shredding, it's likely they might not make it very long. Just like with every single one of the cops that saw Anthony Weiners laptop, I have a feeling they wont be around to tell the tale.

5
PlateOwner [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump could have said, "The FBI destroyed evidence. The military is taking over the investigation."

Pat Cipollone would have had an aneurysm and Mark Meadows a panic attack.

But Trump would still be president.

4
party12 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, there is nothing to say but if the Republicans do not know how important it is at this stage (after the last 5 years) that they be one step of the Democrats, they will never be capable of governing.

Then they deserve what they get. We have had 5 years to see what the Democrat party is--Trump told them over and over that mail-in ballots were ripe for fraud and Republicans created no safety nets while Dems delivered every trick in the book to steal the vote.

3
Junosu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course they did. The FBI is more of an enemy to the American people than China.

1
theglynn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that was interesting. Meadows called the fbi off?

Trump though talked all about the election problems, almost entirely. I disagree with Patrick it was like all the other rallies. I actually don't care that he and Flynn did not speak. What Guliani and his IT guy said was how Georgia Senate races were stolen.

1
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Accused by who exactly other than us?......

We've known this shit happen for weeks now... It was never hidden

1
PlateOwner [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this story credible? We know there was incontrovertible evidence of election fraud. We know Barr did nothing.

Destroying evidence should be an indictable offence. Ordering the destruction, too.