Both rapists and gulag workers who come knocking will be met with extreme prejudice. I am not going to rape them, or gulag them. I'll just remove their ability to be a threat to me.
Are you not picking up what I am putting down, pede? Do I have to rape the rapist? Can I not simply end the rapist?
Really strange message, I sincerely do not understand your premise. Please explain.
So your plan is to murder all the bad guys, but still be high road?
Okay. Let me know how that works out.
Actually, let me explain. What you are doing is loser think, and I'll explain why.
First, you aren't an ultimate badass that can take the million and one they will send after you. And even if you were half the super ninja who could, you'd wait until they show up to do anything, and by then it would be too late.
Instead, you'll sit around while they build up a massive force, waiting for that moment you can call it direct self defense, instead of preempting the bad guys and putting THEM in a gulag so they can't organize to gulag YOU. Because to go out and be proactive isn't high road and that's more important to you than winning.
Now, in theory, and this is really heavy on the theory, maybe you learn that lesson, and instead of gulag-ing them, you preempt their gulag and go out and murder the lot of them, but then you have the problem that you just got rid of a few million people, many of whom could have been deprogrammed if you were just a little more willing to play dirty. So your highroad actually ends up in a low road which is even lower than gulaging the communists.
But instead of doing either of those, you'll talk big online, take the 'highroad' and end up in the gulag with the rest of us.
But it's cool man, I'll save you a bowl of porridge.
I'll be using quotes only going forward, since reading comprehension is apparently in question. You should probably do the same, so we can reply to things actually written and not strawmen.
So your plan is to murder all the bad guys, but still be high road? Okay. Let me know how that works out.
No, I have no plans for murder. Not sure where you got that impression. Feel free to quote it if you can find it.
Actually, let me explain. What you are doing is loser think, and I'll explain why.
Please and thank you.
First, you aren't an ultimate badass that can take the million and one they will send after you. And even if you were half the super ninja who could, you'd wait until they show up to do anything, and by then it would be too late.
There are situations I am prepared for, and some that I am not. The delineation of which is ultimately private, but if you are concerned for me, I do appreciate it and rest assured I am capable of protecting myself.
Instead, you'll sit around while they build up a massive force, waiting for that moment you can call it direct self defense, instead of preempting the bad guys and putting THEM in a gulag so they can't organize to gulag YOU. Because to go out and be proactive isn't high road and that's more important to you than winning.
I won't be putting anyone in gulags. I find that type of conduct reprehensible and amoral, regardless of who is perpetrating the crime.
Now, in theory, and this is really heavy on the theory, maybe you learn that lesson, and instead of gulag-ing them, you preempt their gulag and go out and murder the lot of them, but then you have the problem that you just got rid of a few million people, many of whom could have been deprogrammed if you were just a little more willing to play dirty. So your highroad actually ends up in a low road which is even lower than gulaging the communists.
None of this is what I was discussing, or suggesting. I'm paying attention to your hypothetical scenario, though.
I don't really have much to say about it other than it sounds fantastical, unrealistic, and not something I would ever involve myself with.
You're also framing a tautology, but but I'm getting a bit tired to chase it right now. Maybe tomorrow if you really want to press this particular point of escalation versus tolerance.
In short, I'm not interested in getting rid of a few million people. I merely seek liberty, the ability to pursue happiness, and the right to defend my life and livelihood.
But instead of doing either of those, you'll talk big online, take the 'highroad' and end up in the gulag with the rest of us.
I am most certainly not "talking big online". In fact, I am rather quiet when it comes to "me" or even "you". I do however discuss ideas.
As to where I "end up" it will ultimately have nothing to do with anonymous strangers I debate with online. You'll handle yours and I will mine. You and I are not forming a social contract, since we know nothing about each other IRL.
But it's cool man, I'll save you a bowl of porridge.
I appreciate that, thank you. I will save you some ammo. Hopefully you have good aim and know how to accurately identify commies.
Perhaps reread what I wrote.
Both rapists and gulag workers who come knocking will be met with extreme prejudice. I am not going to rape them, or gulag them. I'll just remove their ability to be a threat to me.
Are you not picking up what I am putting down, pede? Do I have to rape the rapist? Can I not simply end the rapist?
Really strange message, I sincerely do not understand your premise. Please explain.
So your plan is to murder all the bad guys, but still be high road? Okay. Let me know how that works out.
Actually, let me explain. What you are doing is loser think, and I'll explain why.
First, you aren't an ultimate badass that can take the million and one they will send after you. And even if you were half the super ninja who could, you'd wait until they show up to do anything, and by then it would be too late.
Instead, you'll sit around while they build up a massive force, waiting for that moment you can call it direct self defense, instead of preempting the bad guys and putting THEM in a gulag so they can't organize to gulag YOU. Because to go out and be proactive isn't high road and that's more important to you than winning.
Now, in theory, and this is really heavy on the theory, maybe you learn that lesson, and instead of gulag-ing them, you preempt their gulag and go out and murder the lot of them, but then you have the problem that you just got rid of a few million people, many of whom could have been deprogrammed if you were just a little more willing to play dirty. So your highroad actually ends up in a low road which is even lower than gulaging the communists.
But instead of doing either of those, you'll talk big online, take the 'highroad' and end up in the gulag with the rest of us.
But it's cool man, I'll save you a bowl of porridge.
I'll be using quotes only going forward, since reading comprehension is apparently in question. You should probably do the same, so we can reply to things actually written and not strawmen.
No, I have no plans for murder. Not sure where you got that impression. Feel free to quote it if you can find it.
Please and thank you.
There are situations I am prepared for, and some that I am not. The delineation of which is ultimately private, but if you are concerned for me, I do appreciate it and rest assured I am capable of protecting myself.
I won't be putting anyone in gulags. I find that type of conduct reprehensible and amoral, regardless of who is perpetrating the crime.
None of this is what I was discussing, or suggesting. I'm paying attention to your hypothetical scenario, though.
I don't really have much to say about it other than it sounds fantastical, unrealistic, and not something I would ever involve myself with.
You're also framing a tautology, but but I'm getting a bit tired to chase it right now. Maybe tomorrow if you really want to press this particular point of escalation versus tolerance.
In short, I'm not interested in getting rid of a few million people. I merely seek liberty, the ability to pursue happiness, and the right to defend my life and livelihood.
I am most certainly not "talking big online". In fact, I am rather quiet when it comes to "me" or even "you". I do however discuss ideas.
As to where I "end up" it will ultimately have nothing to do with anonymous strangers I debate with online. You'll handle yours and I will mine. You and I are not forming a social contract, since we know nothing about each other IRL.
I appreciate that, thank you. I will save you some ammo. Hopefully you have good aim and know how to accurately identify commies.
Like I said. You basically won't get your hands dirty if it means winning.
You'll go to the gulag with the rest of us, but your hands will be as fresh and clean as the driven snow.
So, when we lose, that's on you. Congrats.
You’re apparently suggesting going on the offensive.
Maybe also suggesting that the ends justify the means.
I disagree, and do not find your arguments here to be at all persuasive.
And like I explained to you many times, I won’t be going to any gulags. Not alive at least.
I’ve read Solzhenitsyn, and know how this works.
Impressing you is not my goal. I have but one judgement to contend with.