3890
Comments (232)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
50
MAGA777Logistics 50 points ago +51 / -1

They're all RINOs aside from a few freshman phenoms.

32
dirtbiscuit 32 points ago +33 / -1

Not a single one worthy of re-election. They post based tweets, but they post no wins.

13
marishiten 13 points ago +17 / -4

To be fair, the house voted on party lines. No republican (voting to not remove her) broke ranks and no democrat broke ranks. The democrats hold a razor thin majority in the house.

27
VenusDe 27 points ago +27 / -0

To be fair -- that's why they certified a fraudulent election. They like to PRETEND to oppose Dem policies to get elected (in a minority position) without having to deliver results.

If it had been a SECRET ballot, 145 GOP would have voted with the Dems. See: Liz Cheney conference vote last night.

9
SupremeDearLeader2 9 points ago +9 / -0

So will we ever hear about the Awan Brothers and Wasserman Shultz or are the r's/rinos completely " incurious" [ bought off ] on that scandal too???

1
hardcorCDN 1 point ago +1 / -0

They. Will. Regret. It. The pendulum swings both ways...

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
3
citizen_soldier 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't understand this--didn't 11 R's vote to remove her? That's breaking ranks, isn't it? I mean, yeah the ones who didn't, didn't--but some did. Some R's broke ranks. Did any Democrats even vote "present"? (honest question, IDK).

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
9
CatfishJack 9 points ago +9 / -0

And the RiNOcrats are hell bent to do all they can to help destroy them because those ignorant freshmen won’t shut up. They need to fall in line until they learn how things are done in Washington.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
7
FUJIMO_1977 7 points ago +7 / -0

I say anyone elected before 2016 is suspect