33
Comments (6)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
marishiten 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's there to debunk. She was either in the Capitol or not. The only building to see any breach or protest at all was the capitol. So was she there or not? It sounds like she wasn't. So she's lying.

There's nothing left to fact check.

It's a binary choice. Yes or no. There is no 'it's more complicated than that'.

3
PolishBaldEagle [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea they spinning the truth.. kinda like “well, she was there... earlier” or some bullshit like “technically her premises/office is considered part of “the capital””