298
Comments (31)
sorted by:
13
Global_Tornado 13 points ago +13 / -0

The plan involves taxing everyone an extra 30,000 a year so some people can get an extra 15,000 (before taxes)

5
Crisis83 5 points ago +5 / -0

Half of that money will be wasted in administration costs and washed off to pay politicians friends and family. Whatever they do pay out has to be used only at companies that donate the most to said politicians.

11
pursuitoftruth1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

Or...or you could just lower taxes.

8
Pierre_Delectoes 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lowering taxes doesn't do anything for Democrats because a full 50% of the country either pays 0 tax or actually gets PAID by the IRS. And that half disproportionately votes Democrat already.

4
TexasPiper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep that’s the giant fucking elephant no one really talks about. We are about to pass (if we haven’t already) the point of where a majority in this don’t pay in. And that majority wants every fucking entitlement and social program ever. We are doomed.

3
Spawnlingman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. My sister is a lib. She doesn't work. Is on three different fake disabilities. Hasn't worked actually since 2010. And she gets a tax return of like 5k each year. Not working.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
AmericanJawa 8 points ago +8 / -0

Because it's worked out great for the Black community, right?

6
Phafi11 6 points ago +6 / -0

You too can receive $350 a month per child (until they turn 18(I assume)) for the low low cost of $1500 a month forever.

2
Crisis83 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo

6
janegalt476 6 points ago +6 / -0

Isn't this the exact way LBJ destroyed the black community...his Great Society Program.

5
HeretostayUSA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mitt shd just go ahead and join the Democratic Party with this socialism.

2
Pierre_Delectoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

He should just go ahead and kill himself and let the government have his fortune since he's so concerned with wealth redistribution and removing white men from positions of power.

1
publ1us 1 point ago +1 / -0

As they say, “be the change you want to see in the world”, Mittens.

4
justwow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Terrible

3
Verrerogo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bad.

I am for kids, but not this way.

2
Crisis83 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best way to help kids is let parents keep their money. The outcome of policies like this follows strict darwinism, people with the worst genes will be encouraged to have more kids while high taxes for middle income families will be discouraged having kids or having more of them since they won’t qualify and taxation is making hard to make ends meet.

Everyone has the right to reproduce, but you have to support your kin, not your parents or the government.

2
publ1us 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Idiocracy gambit. We’ll be watering plants with Brawndo soon enough.

3
Olds77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mitt Romney's not paying jack shit. Even with all his money from China his tax forms showed him paying barely double digits on his income taxes. He'll fork over other folks money, but not his own, jackass.

2
Pierre_Delectoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, let's pay people more to have kids, because the money we already give parents hasn't spawned an entire subclass of welfare leeches who birth children into miserable lives solely for the gibs. Surely paying them more money won't exacerbate the problem.

2
Thunderbolt45 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is such a bad policy.

1
Mattyk6666 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nailed it. good luck finding a conservative voter on benefits in England.

1
MakeFreedomRing 1 point ago +1 / -0

So if you have 3.5 kids you get 15k. Maybe folks can get together to split kids.

1
E942 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something something mormon families average four kids...

1
AkaCoco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here’s an idea. Don’t have children if you can’t budget or afford to.

Are people really this stupid that they have children they can’t feed?

1
Spawnlingman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not one middle class person will qualify. It'll be like the stimulus. So it will severely faze out for most Americans and basically latch the poor and lower middle class. Most of the middle class will pay for it ALL and recieve nothing.

1
Me2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about a bigger tax credit instead?

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is some copy-pasta I have prepared for this subject:


It will not be "here's some cash, enjoy"

The plan is for future govt. "stimulus" (and then a gradual shift away from cash) to be in the form of Central Bank Digital Currency.

China launched theirs a couple of weeks ago

In the US it is called the Digital Dollar

The Banking For All Act is currently passing through the US legislature. It mandates banks will handle Digital Dollar accounts on behalf of the Fed, your account would actually be at the Fed. Thus the role of independent banks will be eroded and eventually dissolved.

The Govt. will have access to every transaction you make through the App (where, when, what) and transactions only with approved partners.

Part of the scheme involves expiration. The govt. will give you UBI and you have 30 days to spend it, or its gone.

Here's a video about it

It is part of the WEF's Great Reset plan, although it has been rumbling for a long time. The Central Planners believe that the problem of price discovery would be solved if only the govt. could see every transaction and the saving of every citizen.

UBI are the chains packaged as the keys to freedom.

The only credit score will be social.

1
Hugo1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Back in the day if you were hooked on bennies you had to pay the drug dealer. Now the DC dealers pay you to be hooked on bennies!

0
Gnometard 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm smart enough to not have kids, so I get to pay more in taxes.

Now I'm supposed to fund people having kids as well?

-8
deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9