2309
Comments (157)
sorted by:
230
Tomm 230 points ago +232 / -2

In a move that surprised no one, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in all three of these cases that there is no standing to bring these cases and this was a colossal waste of our time. In a rebuke of trump, all three of his justices voted with the liberals. Only Breyer and thomas dissented......( news from the future probably)

135
PantsJihad 135 points ago +136 / -1

I sincerely hope you are wrong, but I am expecting the SCOTUS to disappoint as usual.

64
YouNeedVPN 64 points ago +64 / -0

Why would Mitch approved judges all of sudden turn maga?

39
MAGAsJustBegun 39 points ago +39 / -0

There is still a slim chance that conservative leaning judges will side with the constitution, which sides with MAGA.

Simply put, it's factual to say multiple states broke the law by changing election laws without approval from state legislatures.

To my understanding, only a state legislature can constitutionally change election laws.

But in many cases, the state surpassed the legislature, and had Governors and others change rules, regulations, and laws.

How was this possible? I'm not sure exactly, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume it's due to the nationwide signed emergency declarations.

Before the new age emergency declaration system was signed into law by Congress, a state would instead have declared Martial Law.

States used to declare Martial Law during public health scares, riots, times of war or unrest, natural disasters, ect.

Since the more modern emergency declarations have existed Martial law hasn't been used.

They are quite similar, in the fact that an emergency declaration allows a Governor to overstep their authority.

In other words, Corona was used as a tool by the globalists powers to change what they wanted to worldwide.

Showed us that no country is truly free, aside from those who openly defy the globalists.

Those who defied the corona lockdowns 100% obviously have an independence we don't have in USA any more.

21
Unboosted 21 points ago +21 / -0

There is 0 chance that these "justices" will side with justice or the constitution.

6
Porter_POTUS 6 points ago +6 / -0

There have been enough bidens disastrous fuck ups off the bat to change a republican mind

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wouldn't be too confident in that. A ton of Republicans are still going along with the farce that there was no election fraud and the the Jan. 6th event was "insurrection".

These same Republicans allowed for the legal challenges on the Senate floor to be ignored because of an unrelated event.

They're just happy the the lobbyist grift is back open for business.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
MAGAsJustBegun 0 points ago +2 / -2

While I do agree, I'm pretty sure Texas actually didn't have legal standing technically.

I could be wrong, but I think for those cases to be heard they had to have been done by the affected states themselves.

With that said, the SC still could've chosen to rule on it.

It's Mitch Mcconells Court, not Trumps.

1
resoluteAction 1 point ago +1 / -0

I trust Thomas. In his dissent, he argued the SC is legally required to hear any suit by one state against another. There is no exception to this. 7 Judges choose to ignore the requirements of their office.

1
romanhelmet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt they will even hear the cases by giving simple denials without explanation.

This is courts way of ignoring just like the MSM not reporting.

1
Xchr0nos 1 point ago +1 / -0

A constitutional amendment also requires that the proposed amendment be published in 2 newspapers (IIRC) per county - although it may be acceptable for this to be online now, I'm not a lawyer - and then a vote by the public as to whether or not to approve the proposed amendment

6
ProphetOfKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

They won’t. There is a slim chance they’ll rule in our favor because nothing can now be done to rectify the issue - if Biden and Harris could be removed we’d just end up with President pelosi. However, I suspect they’ll rule against so Trump won’t be able to blow up social media with them validating him.

1
yodayoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

You misspelled Bitch.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-11
deleted -11 points ago +1 / -12
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
50
RumorControl 50 points ago +50 / -0

No it was 8-2, Ginesburg rose from the dead

29
vote_for_MAGA_2020 29 points ago +29 / -0

Did no one stake the bitch before they buried her?

23
MyAuntFanny 23 points ago +23 / -0

You had one job, Pence.

11
MegoThor 11 points ago +11 / -0

He lead the blood ritual to resurrect her.

3
Kyro5411 3 points ago +3 / -0

How much adrenochrome did that require?

2
SaltyBAZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

The usual 666 oz.

5
plastic_Strawman 5 points ago +5 / -0

He took that stake and stabbed Trump in the back with it.

3
TheNewRepublic2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

ROTFLOL! FAF!

10
szl_ 10 points ago +10 / -0

She also voted for Biden!

3
Smudgerator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Vote? Dems have no need to vote.

3
BLM_bidenLovesMinora 3 points ago +4 / -1

Hopefully she'll be seeing that faggot soon as well.

18
Robiscore98 18 points ago +18 / -0

Wasn't Alito the one with Clarence Thomas to dissent?

8
ProudlyConservative 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes

9
YourOwnGreatGrandma 9 points ago +10 / -1

Breyer? Lol

6
deleted 6 points ago +9 / -3
-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
14
ThxU4URService 14 points ago +14 / -0

+1 one to not racist. Jew is not a racial slur. The only ones to think that are faggot liberals.

-1
ProphetOfKek -1 points ago +1 / -2

I dunno man, I hate it when people call me Jewish.

12
FreeSpeechMaster 12 points ago +13 / -1

You mean "realism", right?

9
vote_for_MAGA_2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

That wasn’t racist

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
77
kazimiera 77 points ago +77 / -0

Unless they actually L👀K at the evidence, and make a ruling on the unconstitutional breaches of law that states used to certify fraudulent ballots, votes, AND force a revalidation, it's just a CUCKMONKEY dance for show and tell

30
vote_for_MAGA_2020 30 points ago +32 / -2

Even if scotus rules in our favor, the outcome isn’t going to change. The dementia patient isn’t going anywhere.

25
TeeBP 25 points ago +25 / -0

If the SC takes the constitution's side, Biden and the left will just declare them terrorists and remove them.

15
D0NNIE_DARK0 15 points ago +15 / -0

Well it would be well deserved. They should have thought about that earlier.

16
cryogen 16 points ago +16 / -0

Not at once, but it can build. States and Trump could sue Biden Campaign and Congress. SCOTUS could rule in their favor. It would be "biblical" and take enormous pushes from the public and stones from judges. But it's possible.

Don't just accept slavery because fighting your masters is hard or seems impossible. Never give up, never give in, never surrender.

3
BLM_bidenLovesMinora 3 points ago +4 / -1

The dementia patient isn’t going anywhere.

At his rate that faggot will be in Hell with Cunt Batter Ginsberg soon.

2
antiGen4z 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was all part of the plan!

2
Viewer01 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that’s what conference is for. They’re hearing the cases.

2
fdagasfd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless ruling in accordance with the law is too scary. Then everything goes out the window.

63
Urusovite 63 points ago +63 / -0

“We’ve decided you still lack standing. Case dismissed. Thanks for the scotus positions, y’all, but also fuck you and your patriotism. Since when are we supposed to do our job?” ~SCOTUS

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
8
Legionnaire0311 8 points ago +8 / -0

This.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
49
Enkryptor 49 points ago +49 / -0

If the courts were willing to be convinced and willing to dispense justice they would have already heard the cases BEFORE THE FUCKING INAUGURATION.

26
vote_for_MAGA_2020 26 points ago +26 / -0

It’s all political theater

18
Wexit-Delecto 18 points ago +18 / -0

They found “no standing” after hearing zero arguments on standing.

How could a state have no standing to bring a violation of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, the court having original jurisdiction over such matters? It’s still stunning!

4
Patriot_Lettuce 4 points ago +4 / -0

SCOTUS will probably claim that no person was the injured party in these cases. "Only the Constitution was injured, but since the Constitution isn't filing a lawsuit, since it's an inanimate object, then SCOTUS' hands are tied. Too bad, so sad! Thanks for the SCOTUS lifetime appointments though! Suckers!"

Or something similar to the levels of bull shit the above statement represents.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hopeless

41
FreeSpeechMaster 41 points ago +41 / -0

YAY!!! THREE MONTHS TOO LATE!!! YIPEE!

34
amilbarge00 34 points ago +34 / -0

This is a show. The democrats want them to put the final seal of approval on that fraudulent election.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
9
vote_for_MAGA_2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

Black pill, but kek, you’re prob right

31
tjwilli3 31 points ago +31 / -0

I think the best that could come from this is shining a light on the atrocities that occurred with the state laws and legislatures. cant see anything profound or earth-shattering resulting...

lets be honest... going to be a lot of "no standing" anyway

26
mschopman 26 points ago +26 / -0

Hope Sydney and her team anticipates on every possible administrative or procedural trick they can probably pull. They will try everything.

15
Johnfox13 15 points ago +15 / -0

You misspelled this, sorry we are going to have to dismiss this on lack of perfection.

24
Krakenhead 24 points ago +25 / -1

I've never been a hater of Wood or Powell but wake me up if anything happens.

11
Johnfox13 11 points ago +12 / -1

This is me. If its happening you can post all the Ron Paul happening memes and we can be giddy. But until then I’d rather not have expectations ruined again.

12
vote_for_MAGA_2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

I have zero expectations. At best, this just shines light on the blatant corruption. Even then, faggot media won’t cover the story correctly or at all.

The dementia patient pedophile isn’t going anywhere.

3
Krakenhead 3 points ago +3 / -0

To me it's more about not wanting to spend any more time on it. I don't doubt that Wood and Powell will present compelling evidence. The courts being impartial is what I doubt.

3
ObamasLooseButthole 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same, fren.

22
MegoThor 22 points ago +22 / -0

BREAKING NEWS; Government Investigates Itself, Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing

11
leonine6 11 points ago +11 / -0

So I am supposed to hope they found integrity and a backbone?

10
bidensmissingbrain 10 points ago +10 / -0

Alright, I'ma shoot my shot:

SCOTUS hears the case, rules in favor of Trump/Powell and states there were irregularities, laws were broken and there is standing evidence of fraud.

So they'll kick the job of prosecuting those responsible back down to the state AGs, and then leave it up to the states to recall any fraudulently elected congressmen and hold a special election to replace. They'll leave it up to congress to impeach and remove the fraudulently elected president/vice president for "cheating" in the election. Rectifying the illegally changed election laws/rules will be left up to the state legislatures to deal with.

The only one of those three things that has a shot in hell of happening is the first one. State AGs will probably prosecute a couple of low-line henchmen that actually had their hand in the cookie jar while leaving the people who are actually responsible for pulling the strings untouched (because going after them would require work and risk). State legislatures might kick and scream and generate some headlines but won't actually get anything meaningful done, and you're kidding yourself if you think any congressmen/senators are going to get recalled. Even if they were, the chances of tying everything that occurred directly to Biden or his campaign is the one link nobody has been able to come up with yet and I doubt they ever will.

7
Robiscore98 7 points ago +7 / -0

State AGs are Dem lmao you think they'll do anything at all

1
TheCandorist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone would have to arrest and charge them. In at least 3 states they were the genesis of fraud.

1
congruent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your scenario sounds just like every story in politics in the last 30 years.

How am I supposed to get Hopium-high on this?!

9
BaltimoreCrew 9 points ago +9 / -0

The courts are willing to let people die awaiting their day in court fighting insurance companies for denied disability claims with stage 4 cancer at the fed district level. This isn’t much different and TBH, the difference is our country dies in the end. I read her book. Our country and court system is a mess all the way up to SCOTUS.

8
tfinley 8 points ago +11 / -3

Time to see if they read and understand the constitution since the texas case. Contact the justices and request they adhere to the constitution this time. Please do so in a polite and respectful manner. Justices thomas and alito have earned the utmost respect. They are honorable men.

8
de9ebkmd7 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is designed to give lip-service to our complaint of massive election fraud so they can say "The Supreme Court looked at it and didn't find any merit to the case". The commies in control continue to beat us down.

3
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

That actually sounds correct.

7
Logan051361 7 points ago +7 / -0

welp its a Start. Lets Hope that the Justices fold under pressure from we the people and do the right thing. Anything can happen. we shall see

7
Donkeyballs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Until they get threatened, then they’ll drop it.

6
PowTimesTwo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Guess we're getting 6 new justices next week.

4
trumpORbust 4 points ago +4 / -0

Packed and Stacked

Like ms obozo

6
AgnesDomini 6 points ago +6 / -0

Once the courts are corrupted, the people are without legal remedy. That is an invitation to rebellion. Rebellion leads to anarchy. anarchy leads to destabilization. Destabilization leads to despotism, as the malfeasants having initiated the corruption swoop in to complete the assumption of powers, resulting in full-blown tyranny. This is all planned destruction; the globalists elitists want to compel massive and wide-spread civil unrest, and to depopulate our military (hence the BS with culling going on right now under pretense of rooting out white supremacy), in order to pave the way for UN "peacekeeping forces" to occupy our country (to put down the "insurrection" and unrest, no doubt led by Chinese troops having no compunctions about shooting Americans). You've been warned, Pedes. Just remember this: Even soldiers fighting with the knowledge of certain death and defeat choose to die honorably and fighting...think on Sir Walter Scott's poem "Lay of the Last Minstrel" (romanticized battle story of a traveling storyteller):

https://poets.org/poem/lay-last-minstrel-canto-vi-my-native-land

5
Big_Sam_Handwich 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's nice to hear they could get around to it. Hopefully not too much of an inconvenience in their busy schedule.

5
Slickrick941 5 points ago +6 / -1

Don't do that dont give me hope

8
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 8 points ago +10 / -2

DRINK YOUR HOPIUM!!!

8
YouNeedVPN 8 points ago +8 / -0

The sooner people accept the state isn't on our side, the sooner we can fix it.

8
Wexit-Delecto 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can’t fix tyranny with lawsuits

1
trumpORbust 1 point ago +1 / -0

No lawsuits in Minecraft

3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

And breathe the copium

4
Christopian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can a republican government pass an ID law in their state without the legislature now?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Christopian 1 point ago +1 / -0

yup.

4
hansgruber7 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does anyone else still have PTSD from any Post that begins with "BREAKING"? Those posts and the Tik Tok posts gave me a hernia every day from Nov 3 to Jan 20. Not sure I'll ever recover fully from that horrible period.

3
trumpORbust 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should all get disability checks from bidet... $2,000!

Eh, I'll settle for $1,400

How about $999

Can I please have $500 master

Fuck me for a dollar

4
Not_your_King 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have no faith in the system...

4
jrgreen73 4 points ago +4 / -0

IOW February 19 is the day the SCOTUS again says the American people have no standing.

3
DeplorableSpic3 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is how it works pedes, if there’s no political will to tackle the problem it will not happen:

The scotus are very smart ... unfortunately they apply their smarts to bend the law to accommodate their bias

So they’ll re-re-interpreted the constitution and find some penumbra of implied of self evident of manifested way to justify the steal

Recall pedes the scotus it’s a political body that responds to political forces ... it’s time to make yourself heard

3
MMazeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

They won’t fully engage it and it will be a footnote. Seems like the 3 Trump appointees want nothing to do with something this controversial.

3
NadlerShartWaddle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, everyone broke the law and this election was invalid.

But retroactively changing the result would result in mass chaos, so this court order (like the one PA broke to count extra votes) will prevent this from happening in the future.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mass chaos (and much worse) is just fine if it means the Constitution is defended.

3
yurimodin 3 points ago +3 / -0

glad they are taking their time to get it done right.........

1
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, only Democrats can pass laws without the legislature.

3
Wexit-Delecto 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who cares? SCOTUS has already shown they don’t respect the Constitution and won’t save the Republic.

The military is the only way.

3
Taupkek 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would love to be pleasantly surprised but not holding my breath. They had the chance to pluck a case before the election when it would have made a difference but chose not to. They will either decide not to hear the case because it is now moot since Biden is now President or it will be a "we'll get 'em next time!" ruling.

3
sunchap 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fact that SCOTUS waited until now to progress this case, thus impliedly accepting that it was properly brought, is the greatest legal scandal in US history.

SCOTUS have been slow, cowardly and possibly complicit in the greatest election fraud of all time. Every single judge should be impeached - for not resigning in protest at this slowness.

They could have made a decision in a week. It was a simple constitutional argument (and it is obvious that Secretaries of state cannot change electoral laws). The delay has made the decisions meaningless.

Did the Nuremberg judges wait twenty years? And deny justice to six million Jews. No, they answered the call and took brave decisions with possibly violent repercussions from ex-Nazis. SCOTUS was scared of 22 year old BA grad Antifa morons...

SCOTUS has defrauded 80 million working and middles class Americans of their vote. Rot in hell you criminals.

3
GuerillaYourDreams 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great. Remove the Fraudster from office.

3
gbolcer 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only reason to group them is to blanket dismiss, but we'll see.

3
TheWhitestOfFangs 3 points ago +3 / -0

They'll intentionally conflate the cases and suggest they are all Qanon conspiracy - and kick em' all out. Easy way to get rid of the content by drowning it in noise.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's exactly what I was thinking.

3
midareashi 3 points ago +3 / -0

2 more weeks

2
80960KA 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they really want to twist the knife, they'll accept it and rule favorably, but with the caveat that because the election has already been decided and the risk of civil strife is too high the decision carries no legal authority to change anything.

2
Tripin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even if it's proven that fraud led to biden becoming president they can't remove him. It'll just be some strongly worded letters and a don't do it again type thing.

2
Camel-Toe-Harris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too little too late.

2
WindyCityBluez 2 points ago +2 / -0

SPOILER ALERT!! Dems file a motion of REEEEEEEE and SCOTUS crawls back into their hole. AMERICA HAS FALLEN

2
Onemoretime11 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh brother, here we go again

2
Light_HIV_Effect 2 points ago +2 / -0

They didn't want to get involved because then there'd be riots at their steps, so they can look at it now, but too late on actually issuing a rememdy, Biden already sworn in. "Better luck next time, should have sued before there were actual damages." LOL

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can issue a remedy. Fraud vitiates everything.

2
NecturusMaculosus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, SCOTUS better wake up and smell the coffee..they can see the. MILITARY isnt going along with the scam. Time to get on the right side with Jesus and TRUMP!

2
jsphere256 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally two more weeks

2
CaptainButthurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just going to say it now:

NO STANDING

2
AnotherPedeInTheWall 2 points ago +2 / -0

So if they find in all of these cases that fraud occurred in enough numbers to swing the election, can we hang Biden and Harris for treason?

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only if you can tie them to specific fraudulent actions or orders. But once removed, it would not be hard to enact widespread treason prosecutions surrounding the election and the policies they've pursued in the meanwhile, since it has all been contracted by China and contrary to the Constitution. Biden's son and Kamala's husband - that's as far as anyone has to dig to find treason.

2
Aambrick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Going to make a prediction right now:

There is no evidence they will say, Force it back to the lower courts to avoid responsibility, or just not hear it by cancellation at the last minute.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ak83 2 points ago +3 / -1

SCOTUS won't do shit. another part of government loaded with corrupt Communist Shitbags.

2
DeadRepublic 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤔

2
Leatherwood 2 points ago +2 / -0

HEY JOEPEDO, YOU CHILD MOLESTING PIECE OF SHIT. THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL. YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED. PERHAPS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER SHORTENING THE DAYS INSTEAD OF PROLONGING YOUR MISERY. WE ARE NOT LETTING THIS GO. IT IS OVER.