1728
Comments (357)
sorted by:
140
South_Florida_Guy 140 points ago +143 / -3

Yeah, but it's only a temporary side effect.

94
skatestraight 94 points ago +94 / -0

And it's better than getting covid

93
justanotherSCpatriot 93 points ago +93 / -0

I bet it counts as a COVID death.

59
rentfREEEE_since2016 59 points ago +59 / -0

It counts as a covid death. But not a vaccine death. Lol

27
Skogin 27 points ago +28 / -1

Because it’s not a vaccine!

16
War_Hamster 16 points ago +16 / -0

All jokes aside, my parents both have received their first doses. I'm not happy about this at all, but they had the information to make their own decisions. I made sure of that.

13
angrysnowpede 13 points ago +13 / -0

My Mom, too. I was able to present her with enough data to have her cancel her appointment three times, but in the end the pull of the herd and the voices on TV were too strong.

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sadly, we've got to respect their free will.

But that doesn't mean we don't hold those who cajoled and scared them into doing so accountable.

6
Coldbyte 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’ve kept my mom from getting it but it’s getting harder with talks of needing it to do things, like ride an airplane, personally fuck any industry that supports it

7
Parhelion12 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm so frustrated. I have explained everything to my mom. She is not a stupid sheep. Very smart. But she is still compelled by fear for her contact with grand kids. Neither my sister or I want her to do it, but the fear is real. Fuck the MSM. If this shit harms my mom I will be the radical they desperately want me to be. Assholes.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's worse for me. I've got a brainwashed Sister who is a doctor and has been dripping on them to push the EXPERIMENTAL vaccine for months.

If something goes wrong, my Sis will be dead to me. She's even sending out pics and texts celebrating getting the vaccine. Infuriating.

8
KMacsBinder 8 points ago +8 / -0

With the added benefit of a new democrat voter.

4
ColdBrewCovfefe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Haha

3
cutefroggy 3 points ago +5 / -2

I bet it doesn't

22
Sumarongi 22 points ago +22 / -0

I bet you $39,000

4
South_Florida_Guy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bingo

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

No question

12
CuomoisaMassMurderer 12 points ago +13 / -1

Well since you still can't get medicine that's known to be effective, what difference at this point does it make?

Just die already. Obey!

8
BillGall2 8 points ago +9 / -1

If your doc will not prescribe hcq at first sign of Covid symptoms you need to get a different doc.

1
DonaldTrumpForever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, tell us all you know about medicine.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Most States make it impossible for any Dr to do so, and any pharmacist filling such a prescription will also lose their license. In WI, even if you've depended on HCQ to survive for decades, you can't get it.

Just die.

Don't blame the Drs. That only pertains to the rare State where it's legal yet the Dr refuses.

3
residue69 3 points ago +3 / -0

I live in a state where the Dept. of Health secured a large supply of HCQ early on. We still have many doctors that won't prescribe it, some who even admit to taking it themselves prophylactically.

I'm sure it's to get the jackpot Medicare China virus bonus payments. Their boats aren't going to pay for themselves!

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that's a situation where even if you don't need it, asking your Doc if he refuses to prescribe it for any reason could make it a good idea to find a different Dr who would. Just on GPs.

0
DonaldTrumpForever 0 points ago +1 / -1

God, you really are fucking retarded. Peddling your stupid fucking HCQ and ivermectin shit. Or forsythia or who knows what. Without any knowledge of medicine (which you won't admit) and with no brain (which you're blithely unaware of), and all with the smarmiest of confidence.

Stop shilling for nobody, man. No one is paying you to promote HCQ and unproven cures. Just stop. You don't have any medical training, and you think people calling you out for your shit is "condescending." Talk about snowflake.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just admit you're a mass murderer, in cahoots with mass murderers. Then what you're saying makes sense and has some context.

Otherwise, ya got nuthin'

38
Here_we_go 38 points ago +38 / -0

Upside you will always vote Democrat for hundreds of years.

26
CuomoisaMassMurderer 26 points ago +26 / -0

But don't worry when someone dies after getting the vaccine.

And counting votes may take longer than usual, but that's ok.

And people in DC 1/6 were trying to overthrow our Democracy.

And masks help.

And lockdowns are totally necessary.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +7 / -1

And it's ok to skip the normal certification procedures because of said "insurrection".

And all government jobs are "essential" but yours isn't.

(This could get to be a very long list)

2
GrandmaC 2 points ago +2 / -0

And called themselves DEMOCRATS.

5
Liberty_Prime 5 points ago +5 / -0

Until voting starts up again.

4
NOTWOKE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Haha

114
HockeyMom4Trump 114 points ago +119 / -5

Is the death rate higher for the vaccine than for just getting Covid? What the heck.

78
YouNeedVPN 78 points ago +80 / -2

It would be hard to be less deadly than covid.

43
women_for_trump 43 points ago +46 / -3

Just shut up and get the vaccine! You're killing grandma, bigot!

22
Bldg_2019 22 points ago +22 / -0

We’re all in this together! Until you lose your job, business, house, car, spouse, kids and belongings. Then just relax, because it’s good for the planet that you have nothing and nobody, except for the state.

8
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yup.

Now spread those cheeks for your bunghole swabbing....for the good of the nation, China needs that DNA

2
aKekabove 2 points ago +2 / -0

You will own nothing and be happy -some mortal kombat character

1
muy_libre 1 point ago +1 / -0

😂

18
quotahire 18 points ago +18 / -0

it's 137% higher, actually

18
theAvatar 18 points ago +21 / -3

Yup

15
MrStep 15 points ago +15 / -0

Maybe it makes sense if you're 70 or above with other pre-existing conditions like diabetes? If you're younger than that, steer clear.

23
Xanisor 23 points ago +23 / -0

The vaccine risk is probably higher for the elderly too.

5
coldredpill 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup. Killed about 24 old people with the first round of vaccine here. Of course the media says it's "not clear whether they died of the vaccine", but we know.

5
Skogin 5 points ago +6 / -1

Probably definitely.

5
Toughsky_Shitsky 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why fucking roll the dice if it's even close?

Go back to living your life, ffs.

Fuck ANYONE hocking this poison vaccine!

1
indigo_truther 1 point ago +1 / -0

you can't get it in Norway if you're old and "frail"

111
SovereigntyNow 111 points ago +115 / -4

OP and most of you guys are reading this wrong.

This is percentage of reported adverse events.

A number of people will get the vaccine.

A subset of those people will have adverse events.

A subset of those people will report them (or be reported on by medical authorities).

2.37% of this subset have died.

I do not support the vaccine. But let's be reasonable in our criticisms.

35
NormaJeanRocks 35 points ago +37 / -2

Yea, there would be 10's of thousands of people dropping dead from the vaccine so far if this was true. And I dont support it either.

17
what_the_shet 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yea I'm not provaccine by any measure but there was no way 2.3% experienced death from this vaccine, this would be extremely high and everybody would see this effect.

12
Smoke2021 12 points ago +14 / -2

Give it time. Give it time...

It would not surprise me in the least if they were injecting some people (probably preferred social classes) with a placebo vaccine just to encourage and manipulate people into taking it. "See? It's safe!!!' Yeah, bullshit.

I've never been an anti-vaxxer, but lately I am seeing way too many red flags and shady moves by officials. So I'm not ruling out any sort of deception taking place at this point.

11
HillarysHairyAss 11 points ago +12 / -1

Someone downvoted this statement, but it’s possibly the most accurate. There’s a reason why a vaccine for the previous six coronaviruses were not released to the public. It’s because all of the animal test subjects eventually died after the second shot. To be more clear, they died after being infected with the covid virus after receiving the vaccine, which basically primed their body to overreact once they became infected.

https://lbry.tv/@Arkeadius:a/nwnw20210114:c

I would highly recommend listening to the whole thing, but you can find this specific part at 25:48.

6
Smoke2021 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kind of surprised my comment got downvoted already but the one I responded to hasn't been downvoted practically at all. Are a lot of people on here actually buying the narrative regarding COVID-19? Wow.

6
residue69 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bots and shills.

1
NormaJeanRocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you commented to me and I didnt down vote you, you're probably right. I just dont believe what op said in their post title, we would be hearing about those amounts of mass deaths even if the msm refused to report it. But yea, who knows what will come of this vaccine in the near future.

2
residue69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great video. Had no idea she is also an attorney.

She's also a great presenter. I'm listening to her at 2X and having no problems understanding.

About 35 minutes is where she talks about the potential of vaccinated troops, health workers, etc. being wiped out because of antibody dependent enhancement. Somebody has been down the same rabbit hole as me. All the articles I'm pulling up were Archived one month ago.

2
HaitchElGee 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've wondered about the exact mechanism behind vaccines making recipients more vulnerable, and that explains a lot - thank you! I'd probably have had more luck finding out if I'd known what it was called and what to look for, but I've literally never heard a mention of ADE before your comment (gee, I wonder why that could be?!).

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +3 / -3

anything is possible with a corrupt government, but we don't really have proof that they're murdering people with the vaccine, and it would require a lot of conspirators including people administering the vaccine. either doctors or the nurses actually shooting it into people would have to know they are actually mass murdering people. when you think about that, it seems a bit hard to pull off.

but the 'red flag' you should have also noticed, and which we do have evidence for, and can see directly, is that someone here made a post about how 2.3% of everyone who takes the vaccine will die, without posting a DIRECT LINK TO THE STUDY, and instead merely posting a jpg picture of part of it, taken out of context, and when people go out of their way to find the study on their own what do they find? oh it just turns out that the 2.3% wasn't of everyone, but of a smaller group.

so we do have actual observable evidence that people here are full of shit liars who intentionally take things out of context to spread a narrative. i don't like the idea of taking the vaccine but i'm not a fucking liar and i absolutely do not appreciate fucking liars, even if they voted on trump. i'm sick of all the conspiracy bullshit. there are real fucking conspiracies and these idiots who exaggerate and hype up and lie and fabricate bigger, wackier ones, are only serving to COVER UP the real, actual ones. AND they make US look like the liars and also like idiots for spreading complete bullshit.

i wouldn't be surprised of OP is a liberal, spreading around shit like this so that eventually someone can 'fact check' it and show how stupid and wrong all the trump supporters are for gobbling it up. and TOO MANY trump supporters have been doing just that, gobbling up retarded nonsense. how many people were spreading around fake videos made by complete lying retards, about how donald trump was 100% going to use the military to stay in office? we look like fucking fools because of this shit.

it's to the point where i don't believe anything posted here unless i can look at the SOURCE with my own two eyes and verify it. which is how people should always be, anyway, but it's a damn shame that this community has a huge % of people who intentionally mislead, and are basically spreading LIES.

5
SentryS 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is NOT hard to pull off. Stop pretending EVERYONE has to be "in the know" for plans to unfold or cells to operate. You sound so alarmingly foolish.

Here's a test for you.

Take your own advice.

Go get the vaccine.

Stop lurking here. Stop ranting. Stop believing lies. Go and look up the studies. Go and read their rainbow fart presentations and then go and get injected.

Report your first hand experience and then share it with everyone.

If you don't you're just a loud mouth who never thought for yourself anyways.

-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +2 / -3

i never advised anyone to take the vaccine you absolute idiot. and that's all i have to say to you.

1
Smoke2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hear you. I don't think it would be hard to pull off at all, but that's just my opinion. We do need to properly assess accuracy of data put out there, because like you said it could blow up in our faces to make us look like a bunch of nuts, even if well-intentioned. Personally, I don't really take any of the literature on COVID-19 seriously anymore due to the mountains of contradictions I've observed over time, but that's not an easy thing to discuss when you consider the mainstream media's behaviour these days.

-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

i think it would be hard to get nurses to commit mass murder, and not have the secret leak out. it'd take a lot of people being involved in a mass murder of basically the entire world, or huge portions of it. that's completely fucking ridiculous for people to assume it'd be easy for nurses to willfully murder every trump supporter, or everyone from rural areas, or whatever it is we want to pretend to believe is going on.

1
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

How would you know if the media is fake and you know that the media don't report things correctly; and their biggest crime is what they DONT tell you?

19
halfstep 19 points ago +21 / -2

Thank you for this. I was super skeptic that 2% of ppl died from the vaccine, that seemed utterly insane and too big for anyone to ignore.

5
Smoke2021 5 points ago +5 / -0

You think they're going to go full force with a lethal vaccine in the early stages and cause a panic? That would screw up their plans and make it so obvious to the point of backfiring on them. Not to mention, these vaccines are probably going to producing visible symptomatic issues later on for recipients. God only knows what they've put inside these damn things.

Their goal is to control people and de-population, they have to do it gradually or they risk blowing their cover. It sounds crazy, but it's so obvious when you look at UN Agenda 2030/2021

4
this_mortal_coil 4 points ago +4 / -0

100%. I think it's more likely these things have time bombs in them. Like maybe five years from now someone gets a mild cold, has an allergic reaction with a cytokine storm and dies. Or maybe it's a slow kill program that one day 10 years from now and one day you just drop over; the clock runs out.

I've considered that maybe these have a cumulative effect, and as the public receives more and more shots, it slowly programs the cells and systems. I don't know what's in it, I'm not a chemist or bio researcher. But what I do know is that any official story about anything being rolled out to the public and it being "good" for us, is huge, steaming pile of horse shit.

3
Smoke2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly! Glad to see others get it and where things may possibly go in time with this so-called vaccine. Could be a delayed effect, or cause a chain-reaction, etc. Who knows! Common sense alone is reason enough not to go near this shit for at least a few years, AT LEAST and even then I still wouldn't want to go near it.

Notice how the flu shot isn't pushed so much lately after years of aggressive marketing trying to convince people to take it? Yeah, something tells me it wasn't going to plan and they decided to expedite the process with a fear campaign. Lots of $$$$ and governments knew they could further capitalize with abuses of power on top of it all. Bunch of rotten bastards.

1
MAGAstroni 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it works they wouldn't have to sell it or mandate it, but they still have to advertise the flu shots because no one can tell the difference if it's working or not.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

who knows, anything is possible. but we do know for a fact that the original poster here took a part of the study out of context, obviously intentionally, to make it look like it's 2.3% of everyone taking the thing are dying, and how convenient that they didn't post a link to the actual study itself? i'm sure that wasn't on purpose now was it?

maybe you should have at least the tiniest bit of concern for how this place is becoming rife with this shit, people basically spreading lies. it makes us look like liars and idiots. we can theorize about what 'they' may or may not be doing with the vaccine but we KNOW for a FACT that the person who started this thread is a fucking liar, and it's way too common here. in fact i think it's at least half the time or more, that if someone here posts something like this, some claim about something, without a direct link to the source, they turn out to be liars. THAT concerns ME.

1
Smoke2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough. I don't disagree with your points regarding accuracy, we definitely need to be careful about that since we are in an information war.

6
deleted 6 points ago +11 / -5
10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

nope basic math would dictate that a % of a smaller sub-group is always going to be smaller than the same % taken out of the bigger, main group. again, basic math.

so for example, if 1000 people took the vaccine, 2.3% of them dying would be 23 people. but if the % is ACTUALLY only for the sub-group of people who had any adverse effect, and i'm just making up a number here but lets say only 200 people had any adverse effect (which would be one out of every 5 people), then your 2.3% only comes out to 5 people dying, when rounded up.

5 is less than 23.

i made up the number of 200 or 1 in every 5 people having adverse effect, but if not everyone has any adverse effect, then taking a % out of the group who do, is always going to be less than taking it out of the overall group.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

you don't understand math. at all.

larger than what? you're bringing in your feelings that the % of people with adverse reactions is being under-reported. we're not talking about your feelings or notions. the OP wasn't posting a picture of your feelings. they were posting a picture out of an official report. and passing it off as if it said something other than what it said.

it was passed off as saying that 2.3% of the FULL GROUP of everyone who takes the vaccine, is dying. when in actuality the report itself does not actually say that. in fact, it says that 2.3% of people who have adverse reactions of any kind, are dying.

2.3% of people who had adverse reactions is smaller than 2.3% of EVERYONE WHO TAKES IT. only a fucking dummy wouldn't understand that. you can talk about how you think that they're under-reporting all you want, and they may very well be, but that has nothing to do with the OP or how it is spreading misinfo about what the 2.3% is of.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-2
russianbot4673 -2 points ago +1 / -3

the numbers being under reported is an entirely different topic. moron.

1
VladimirP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, 100% of people who took the vaccine will die.

4
TopBloke 4 points ago +4 / -0

You’re going to feel really stupid when I find the fountain of youth.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

you got any evidence for that or just wild theories

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

The number of deaths is certainly higher than is reported but no, i am saying that these stata do not say, as it has been taken here, that 2.37℅ of the people who take the vaccine die.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

no dude, that's not how math works. a % of a smaller group can never be bigger than the same % of the larger group. this is really basic math right here.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +2 / -3

whatever man, your comment just doesn't make sense. someone is explaining how the OP is misleading by suggesting that the 2.3% was from the total group, and you reply by simply saying "so the number might actually be higher?"

it just doesn't make sense. there is no fucking context in that comment. it's literally one sentence asking a question that doesn't have anything to do with the comment you were replying to. jackass.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

whatever dumb bitch

6
Sumarongi 6 points ago +6 / -0

And how many deaths are not reported to VAERS?

You think they aren’t covering up this shit?

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +3 / -3

You understand that you don't need to endorse mistaken interpretations to see that they're underreporting deaths and other adverse events, right?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
52
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 52 points ago +56 / -4
22
strictly1957 22 points ago +22 / -0

Well son of a bitch.... no but seriously stick your vax up your arse!!!!

12
leg_hairs 12 points ago +12 / -0

Don't give them any ideas.

5
strictly1957 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good one!!!

4
Filo76 4 points ago +4 / -0

No no nO, THE SWAB goes up your arse. The vaccine is stuck in the arm.

2
strictly1957 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny guy!!!! but seriously these ghouls need stopping. They really do...

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
7
cutefroggy 7 points ago +7 / -0

It works. I keep seeing a list with details of how people died but not a chart like the one op is showing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
VladimirP 4 points ago +4 / -0

Source for that exact picture via u/Schmerzlos1337 : https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D8/D113F208

Here's the breakdown by age (and not just US): https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D8/D113F285

Click "I Agree" button at the bottom, then "VAERS Data Search" button or "Request Form" tab, then wait for the request to complete.

It's the percentage among the reports of bad things happening after vaccination (not because of it). In other words, people die every day, whether vaccinated or not. People who took the vaccine and felt fine are not reported.

CC: u/BannedbyRed u/neverreddit u/pepesbiceps u/Poobin420

1
neverreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you!

1
Poobin420 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sweet. Thank you very much.

I understand that correlation doesn't always equal causation, but I still know some people on the fence with the vaccine that would like to see all info, including this.

Thanks again for helping us out.

2
robin_hood 2 points ago +2 / -0

Click "I agree", "Request Form", scroll all the way down and click "Send"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
BadManOrange 16 points ago +16 / -0

Says no results available. What's the VEARS ID?

11
ShortCircuits 11 points ago +11 / -0

Link goes to nothing.

4
MAGA16062015 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is this data limited to the covid vaccine or all of them combined?

2
robin_hood 2 points ago +2 / -0

Covid Vaccine - Click "I agree", "Request Form", and see the filters filled in

31
justanotherSCpatriot 31 points ago +33 / -2

To be fair, that's out of reported events, not doses given.

15
Japan4Salt 15 points ago +16 / -1

Its been speculated that only 1% of adverse reactions are ever reported to VAERS.

7
justanotherSCpatriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

Fair point. No doubt, underreported.

5
BaltimoreCrew 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s normal with just about any “adverse” event with a human being. For example, only about 5% of child rapes are reported and only 15% of those are adjudicated. If you did the inverse calculations of say 100 child rapists sentenced in a city you would likely have a huge number of rapists running around, which is the case unfortunately. That number would be 2,000 with a handful actually being punished.

1
Zskills 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would imagine that "death" has a pretty high reporting rate

3
Japan4Salt 3 points ago +3 / -0

You would probably be surprised as everything is being blamed as a Covid death.

2
Zskills 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha true.

8
ughhhhhh 8 points ago +9 / -1

Wish more people would understand this

4
Desperado 4 points ago +8 / -4

To be fairer, Covid itself is also a reported event, right? So what's your point?

12
justanotherSCpatriot 12 points ago +14 / -2

All I'm saying is understand your denominator. Lets not be the ones throwing around stupid numbers.

3
Desperado 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a vaccine. Not a therapeutic. It's given out to healthy people. The acceptable DEATH RATE for shooting up HEALTHY PEOPLE should be ZERO.

You're the one parsing numbers and language, not me.

-2
justanotherSCpatriot -2 points ago +1 / -3

Look, if you're gonna do math do it right or look fucking stupid, it's your choice. OP's title is bullshit. No parsing needed.

2
neverreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate this clarification

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the actual deaths are more

2
Smoke2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very likely.

23
Kekintosh2020 23 points ago +25 / -2

For a chinkflu 99.999% of non terminally ill octogenarians survive

18
South_Florida_Guy 18 points ago +18 / -0

No no no! Don't you understand?! Perfectly healthy Olympic level athletes in their prime are DROPPING DEAD IN THE STREETS RIGHT NOW! I just looked outside and saw the entire USA men's track and field team DIE right outside of my window!

7
Gyrfalcon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then they transitioned and are now playing wymins track.

5
keep_america_great 5 points ago +5 / -0

Everyone that I know of that died of it had massive health problems that had them on deaths door anyway. 200+ pounds overweight , stage 4 cancer, etc.

19
Farage_massage 19 points ago +20 / -1

So the vaccine has a worse death rate by a factor of 5 than literally doing nothing as a healthy person and deliberately getting Covid.

🤡 🌎

4
MI_MAGA 4 points ago +5 / -1

Big Government and Big Pharma combined make for a helluva drug

19
Redditcanblowme 19 points ago +25 / -6

So.... Let's trade a virus with a less than 1% mortality rate for a needle jab that will kill 2.37%

11
WillNotBeRuled 11 points ago +12 / -1

So the risk of dying is greater with the vaccine than getting the China Virus.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

So vaccinate everybody!! Starting with those closest to dying to begin with.

4
leakmouth 4 points ago +6 / -2

The virus mortality rate is .03%. Therefore you are 76.7 times more likely to die from the vaccine than from the virus itself based on this data in my calculations.

15
muy_libre 15 points ago +17 / -2

The media has led millions to believe that mRNA vaccines have been around for a long time, and that this one was just adjusted for covid. What they fail to tell you is that it’s never been released for public consumption before covid. It was purely experimental. I didn’t even know this until recently. Don’t take this fucking vaccine.

[spez] I’m genuinely curious why this a has a few downvotes? Is what I said not true? From what I’ve read, the covid vaccine is the first mRNA vaccine released for public consumption that wasn’t part of some sort of study.

4
Smoke2021 4 points ago +4 / -0

Great comment. People who just "trust their doctor" (blindly, like morons) do not know the danger they are actually in. The Canadian healthcare system screwing me over repeatedly for over a decade has - ironically and probably - saved my life by forcing me to be my own advocate and learn how medicine works. If I did not know about gene therapy and other subjects, I wouldn't really understand what the huge fuss was all about concerning these vaccines.

Tldr; do not take the fucking MRNA vaccine. If you are forced to and have a choice of which one to get later on, opt for the inactivated protein vaccines which are how many traditional vaccines are produced. I still wouldn't even trust THAT, but I am talking worst case here where you may be forced, though if you are forced they probably won't give you that choice in the first place.

3
muy_libre 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it’s pretty terrifying what people are willing to just go along with. And I’ve heard some horrifying stories about what the 2nd dose is doing to people. Why are people accepting this as normal? I’ve never taken a vaccine that absolutely wrecks you.

2
Smoke2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

The brainwashing is strong in many people. It's a little disturbing how ignorant and out of touch so many people are. Not to mention the million red flags surrounding this entire situation, I mean how much more obvious can you possibly get until these people wake up and see what is right in front of them?

13
deleted 13 points ago +18 / -5
4
Skogin 4 points ago +5 / -1

It’s really quite simple:

We need you to die in order to save lives, bigot.

3
idkfa 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's 2.37% of reported adverse events, not injections, so you can't compare the numbers directly.
You're likely being downvoted for that.
The OP is misleading and most commentators don't have the expertise to know this - but there's no excuse to not ask a question about the methodology.

Just so that I'm not eaten alive: vaccine is indeed a bad idea. I've read both papers by Pfizer and Moderna.
For example, here's the Pfizer summary:

  • COVID is very rare with our without vaccine (1% of placebo group and 0.05% of vaccinated group).
  • Severe COVID is even more rare at 0.04% in placebo group and 0.005% in vaccinated group.
  • Chance of severe side effects (treatment-related) is zero in the placebo group and 0.02% in the vaccinated group.

Thus you're effectively exchanging severe COVID for severe side effects, and both are exceedingly rare.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
idkfa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair points. However, this specific system is not meant for exhaustive reporting and doesn't pretend that it is.
In that it is quite different from the death counter of every MSM outlet.

Do I trust that the 2.37% of cases reported in the system are deaths? Yeah.
Does it tell me anything at all about the risks? Nope.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Esodo 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nothing is gonna make me take this vaccine. Not even keeping a job is worth this shit. Just give me some vitamins and send me on my way if I get it.

9
PapaPepe 9 points ago +9 / -0

Aoc- other people dying is an acceptable loss to beat Republicans

6
PARTY-OF-CONSENT 6 points ago +6 / -0

AOC dying would be a desirable loss.

9
MarzMonkey 9 points ago +9 / -0

Meanwhile fucking 'anxiety' and 'back pain' two of the most common symptoms in people everywhere is less than DEATH

5
Gyrfalcon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Did you notice electrocardiogram as a symptom?

3
Skogin 3 points ago +4 / -1

Waiting for the vax that causes nuclear fusion

8
LtPatterson 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hard pass, never getting it.

8
StillplayenSometimes 8 points ago +8 / -0

It was just old age!

8
SisterCovfefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Is that not 2.37% of the adverse effects reported?

With millions of people vaccinated at this point, the total number of deaths should be much higher than 232 total.

3
idkfa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, you are correct. The post is misleading.

8
Desperado 8 points ago +8 / -0

More chance of DEATH than BACK PAIN? How is this bullshit even legal?

7
theAvatar 7 points ago +7 / -0

“Legal”

bwahhaahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha....... hahahahahahhahahahahahahaaaaa!!

5
YouNeedVPN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Simple. Law says suppliers cannot be held responsible for the side effects of emergency vaccines.

Not only is it legal, it's more profitable.

5
Sumarongi 5 points ago +5 / -0

And it helps reduce the world population! Because climate change

2
Smoke2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, that's their reasoning too. And what's fucked up is how hardly anyone has picked up on the fact that the reason they want to de-populate so badly is that it is too difficult to control 7+ billion human beings. Much easier to control half a billion... Less variables/complexities. Has nothing to do with resource management/constraints, that's just the MSM cover story.

1
Desperado 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get you 100%. I'm on RFK Jnr's team. I was being rhetorical. Vaccines suck ass.

7
Berret 7 points ago +7 / -0

Waiting for the commercials to start touting the benefits of the vaccine while glossing over all the hundreds of negative side effects including death while old people prance through fields of flowers and go on cruises and see their families and things like that. Ask your doctor about death, I mean about the Covid-19 vaccine.

4
Nellie_the_Beaut 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ask your doctor if death Chinaviruspurumferozol vaccine is right for you!

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Death may not mix well with some other medications you're already taking. Ask your Dr how to avoid making death less effective.

4
Tryhardneckbeard 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've already heard multiple radio PSA's "reassuring" us comrades that the vaccine is completely safe even though there are known side effects. And this is in Houston, TX. It did the usual medical drown out and speeding up of the ad as it specified all possible side effects, and yes, they did say in the same breadth that death is a possible side effect but that its small and that you should still get the vaccine.

3
fickelbra 3 points ago +3 / -0

In 5 years: Did you take the 2021 Covid vaccines? You might be entitled to..

7
de9ebkmd7 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think this is 2.37% of reported side effects, not 2.37% of all who have received the vaccine. I'm still going to pass on that vaccine until they hold me down and force it on me.

3
idkfa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ditto on both!

7
Moebius 7 points ago +7 / -0

Captain Obvious: The Cure is worse than the China Virus...unless one considers Death a 'Cure'...

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Death is their goal. They're killing as many of us as possible. Not enough were dying from CCPvirus, so they raised the price of insulin. It targets the same people.

7
electrictrout1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can you explain your methodology to get these results on the CDC site? I want to reproduce these results as the link you provided didn’t work

6
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just give me COVID. I know a lot of people who have contracted it, and it wasn't a big deal at all.

1
idkfa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Glad that you asked!
In Moderna study, they did include a small arm with corona-infected but asymptomatic people (about 350 people in each group).
There was no difference in COVID contraction rate between vaccinated and placebo groups in that arm, and a total of 1-2 people in each group had it (meaning positive for the virus and e.g. having fever).

Best protection against COVID is having the virus 😂🤡🌎

6
HazelHen 6 points ago +6 / -0

OP you are being misleading! These deaths are a subset of a subset of people!

2.37% of ALL mRNA vaccine takers are not dying! The is total horseshit!

Not that it is relevant but I am highly skeptical of this vaccine when there are proven therapeutic alternatives against the China virus.

1
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This may be the case. I'm going to look into this. But I'm not sure you're right about this.

6
Redditcanblowme 6 points ago +6 / -0

@OP I'd like to share this entire document

5
Schmerzlos1337 5 points ago +5 / -0

I duplicated the results on the CDC website. I didn't even know this information or search was available. I want to know though this is just the number of adverse reactions documented. So, if I am reading this correctly, of the 9,794 adverse events, 2.37% of them were death. Clarify if I am missing something.

I want to make sure before I spread the word that I am giving accurate information. THANKShttps://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D8/D113F208

1
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for doing this

I'm going to link to your saved results on another post

very important that you did this also to fact check me.

1
Schmerzlos1337 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure thing, we are in an infowar ^^

Check what you can, and I was very interested that the tools were available to mine the data. Thank you as well :-)

5
DairyBoy 5 points ago +5 / -0

How inconvenient, I think I may decide against getting such a vaccine

5
LackDoodleDoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's 2 things wrong with the sentiment of this post.

the 2.37% is out of the people who have adverse side effects. Not everyone with the vaccine.

Also the main part, most people getting the vaccine at the moment are the oldest and most vulnerable in society. The deaths reported here aren't 'deaths because vaccine' they are just the person died at some point after taking the vaccine. This group of people are the people in society who die all the time. Read the medical records on the site, most of them state the actual cause of death.

5
TallGlassofMelonade 5 points ago +7 / -2

Hell, COVID itself is only 1.2%.

5
Sumarongi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Way less than that

4
Cheezeit7 4 points ago +4 / -0

More like .02

2
GiveMe1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s about an eighth of that if you leave out people above 70

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

1.2% of all people infected with CCPvirus do not die, it's far lower than that.

4
Itsshowtime 4 points ago +4 / -0

What was the search criteria on this?

I think it's important to know the parameters setup, especially since some snopes-like article will come out and say "but these 2.37% were 85+ with multiple co-morbidities and its impossible to say the vaccine was the sole cause...blah blah"

4
Heywood_Jablowme 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sauce? It’s worth sharing.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what you're saying is that the CDC data is wrong

Why don't you go there and see for yourself and report back to us here

Instead of just saying now. I've published evidence. Why don't you publish counterevidence.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
BaltimoreCrew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, my father who has stage 4 cancer gets his second potential death sentence on Saturday (Covid shot). I was out voted 4-1 by mom, Dr, bro and sis with Dr swaying two undecideds saying it “should be” fine. From a historical perspective his mom and two sisters died within 1 month of flu shots in nursing homes over the last 5-10 years. I guess I could capture him and conveniently miss the appointment lol. It’s so fucked up, but he’s gonna die anyway so my mom and sis who live and take care of him are like fuck it at this point. I would compare it to having a second life in prison charge with 3 months to live. He’s also got dementia and I don’t have a say in the healthcare directive.

I’m 100% sure if the shot kills him they’ll conveniently state that it was the cancer of course.

These are the decisions people are being forced to make with this bullshit.

3
The_Blue_Mirage 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no way that is true..... This is most likely the % of severe side effects so 1/10,000 * 237/10,000 = 237/100,000,000

3
Madpoli 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where's the direct link, I want to be able to share this with liberals if this is actually real.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's not real and if you share it with liberals they're going to make you look like an idiot. good thing you're smart enough to want direct links. people here seem to like posting fake bullshit and not posting direct links right in their original post.

3
My2Cents 3 points ago +3 / -0

headline of post is fake news

3
Niqlndym 3 points ago +3 / -0

This seems to be misinformation. The percentage shown is the percentage of *reported side effects. *It’s not the percentage of vaccinated people.

I opened up the report for all Covid vaccines, from all manufacturers, for all dates. It returned a total of 9794 total side effect. 2.4% of those side effects, or 235, were death.

I’m not sure the total vaccine date is available on this report.

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we get the direct link posted?

3
Alpha_Lemming 3 points ago +3 / -0

20 million have received the vaccine in the US. 2.37 percent of this is a little under half a million.

C'mon, man!!!!

3
BotFlyPenis 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no way you will get the truth from any public facing database. This is 235 out of 10k adverse effects out of tens of millions who have had the vaccine. Miniscule and certainly not accurate. The narrative is "dermf vaccine safe'. Public facing databases will be sure to show that regardless of truth.

3
PewPew_ThaDuK 3 points ago +3 / -0

That shit is worst than covid

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always has been.

2
jslenterprises 2 points ago +2 / -0

So given that it has a higher death rate than covid; I would rather have Covid.

2
Wanderlust 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can anyone figure out a link to the source? Would love to share.

2
NeverNotTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does a vaccine cause electrocardiogram?

2
Scuffers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Err - is that just the Pfizer one?

2
BemorePcCuntyFagFace 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please send source document I can’t win an argument with this

2
SecondProtectsFirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the vaccine kills...what...100x more people than covid does?

2
this_mortal_coil 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the perfect scam for the normies. "Covid is everywhere, people are dying we need a vaccine!" So the "vaccine" is introduced and people start dropping like flies. "People are still dying from Covid, we need more vaccinations!" Vaccinate a million people, and a portion of them die. "The pandemic continues."

Morons.

2
Tenspot20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is Electric Diarrhea on the list?

You Don't Want That!

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Ask your doctor if death is right for you".

2
HunterBidensPC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Covid vaccine more deadly than covid.

Is anyone honestly surprised?