3378
Comments (366)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Blending", even though it's still their names, and each individual name still points to an individual person and they'll still be associated with whatever deeds they're doing. Someone missing part of their dick or not eating leavened bread for a few days a year really is supposed to distract everyone from the fact they bought a controlling share of a company?

Rothschild is Jewish btw, you might be thinking Rockefeller.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I meant not all of them kept their names because, at least to my ears, Rothschild doesn’t sound jewish at all.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait what are you even talking about here? "Keeping their names", pre-diaspora Hebrew names or something? What does that have to do with blending in or scapegoating "real" Jews?

When someone's talking about the Rothschilds nobody's confusing them with some poor Israeli grocery store worker.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m confused on what was asked at this point. I remember somebody asking why keep jewish names if not jewish. The two part answer is many didn’t (at least eventually) and those that did, did so to blend and not stand out as a unique group. That way the latter could also let jews take the fall for whatever nefarious crap they pulled as they hated jews anyway.