4493
Comments (499)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
OlympicHiker 5 points ago +6 / -1

I watched and the final segment of 100% proof was disappointing. (I know I will be downvoted for this but I've got to be honest.)

Who is this Mary Fanning? Not a whole lot on her on the Internet.

Where did she get this data in the spreadsheet? No source was given. Only vague references.

Is this spreadsheet publicly available. Can the MAC addresses or IP addresses of the machines be verified?

Why would China hack from China? Certainly they are more sophisticated than that.

Whoever captured the alleged spreadsheet proof would have to have state level capabilities. Capturing packets all over the internet and sifting through them and even capturing what's inside the packet such and the number of votes changed? This can't be done by a couple of white hat hackers.

I really like Mike Lindell (bought pillows and towels and sheets.) But I think he has been misled in a disinformation campaign to discredit the effort to uncover the real cheating: vote by mail, unverified signatures, ballot harvesting, etc....

1
Deporter 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're disappointed because you don't know who Mary Fanning is and don't have the source of the forensic evidence provided to you? Kind of premature to be disappointed there, champion. Pretty sure the evidence will be presented in court before they email you the files.