1935
Comments (41)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
BlackJack1776 11 points ago +12 / -1

Tim demands people risk everything to protect free speech while he "stays neutral".

It's a shtick. Don't fall for it. Just ask Adam.

11
bar_zangi 11 points ago +11 / -0

Remember when he told republicans to stand up... and the moment they did he threw them under the bus and said they were stupid for doing so... it was when the Proud Boys were going to Portland... he's done the same now for the Capital MAGA tour

8
Mew_Deuces 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ah yes, Mr. Crigler. The reason his channel blew up last year in the first place. Who can forget "30k likes for the MAGA beanie" Now neither of their shows are entertaining without each other.

3
TheCandorist 3 points ago +3 / -0

When adam has the right guest he is good. Needs to not have those lesbians he has on to go away.

2
Mew_Deuces 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not his fault, at least from an outside perspective. Not fully knowing what happened between them, Adam was never meant to host his own show. His color commentary on news articles and the way he and Tim bounced off each other was what made it so successful. Adam provides a necessary "average Joe" opinion to the conversation. He never pretended to know everything and that's seriously lacking from Timcast right now.

4
TheCandorist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Adam makes it pretty clear it wasn't voluntary and after meeting Tim I couldn't imagine working for him. Friends maybe but as a boss I wouldn't want that. He has a weird air of neuroticism and micromanager feel. Tim's show was a lot better with Adam because while Adam isn't super sharp on all the topics it was a competing view. Instead we have Ian that talks about moon crystals and shit. That polish guy is interesting but I can't watch Tim anymore. I can't watch his takes and care with all his flip flopping.