42
Comments (15)
sorted by:
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
NazisWereSocialist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jury nullification is vital

5
BlackKat 5 points ago +5 / -0

banning 3d models is banning free speech.

2
JimCleveland 2 points ago +2 / -0

You got a link to the sauce? I was talking to someone about this the other day and could use the article.

2
DickTick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek

How in the holiest of fucks are you going to ban something that, by it's very nature, people can quite literally print at home?

Good luck with that you fucking retards.

2
TyrantsAreCucks 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's really unenforceable on a large scale. I would imagine there will probably be legislation to require production 3D printers to have some kind of failsafe baked in like anti-counterfeiting measures in scanners/printers so the average joe who buys a printer off of Amazon won't be able to do -- they'll have to build a 3D printer running on open source firmware, but even then parts will likely be regulated like chemicals are regulated for drugs.

They'll make an example out of people like they did with the war on drugs. It won't stop people from doing this, but it will definitely push the community further underground and criminalize people who shouldn't be criminalized. You'll hear about dudes on the news periodically who got caught "Printing ghost guns for domestic terrorists" and they'll treat them like they got caught with CP.

1
NullifyAndSecede 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same way they ban weeds you can grow in your backyard...

With the ruthless threat and application of violence against peaceful people.

2
JoePlumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about 79% lowers?

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just ban things that aren't guns but could be turned into guns.

Buy any steel pipe you need right now.

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’ll never stop the signal ctrlpew, deterrence dispensed, fosscad, and lbry

1
NullifyAndSecede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've printed many guns, never bought plans for any of them.

That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.

He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.

― Thomas Jefferson

The great thing about 3d printers is that they allow our right to free expression to protect our right to self defense.

It should be clear by now that the constitution isn't doing shit on that front.

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

He can try but they would have a hard time doing anything. Unless the government seizes all forms of machinery and hardware (see: dekulakization) they cannot stop people’s ability to make guns if that’s what they feel like they need to do. Also, 3d printed guns are pieces of shit and never used in crimes. It’s more of a proof of concept to demoralize gungrabbers. They need to give up or try and go full internet censorship surveillance state

For example if you are smart you can make a 3d printer. You can get gun plans and printer plans. For now it is totally legal and legitimate to make your own non fully auto guns for yourself. If someone was depraved enough to want to plan some type of violent crime, by the time they were able to make their own gun, they’d probably get a sense of accomplishment and self satisfaction leading them to rethink their plans. Seriously these fuckheads doing school shootings don’t have fathers in the household. They probably couldn’t change the toilet paper roll let alone make a functional weapon.

If you’re concerned about this you should be buying barrels, upper parts kits and ammunition, because those are the important things that may be changed to required to be registered or whatever. If you had a upper parts kit with the bolt, you could probably make the rest out of wood and a trip to ACE if you wanted to, and people can do it legally.

It’s just a shame because the american manufacturing system which led the industrial revolution is totally based on gunsmithing and interchangeable parts. People that are interested in making guns are literally just hobby machinists. And that should be celebrated. It’s a small machine that fits in your hand. Anything else that would be worth making out of metal would be much larger and more expensive

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

From wikipedia: Attempting to restrict the distribution of gun plans via the Internet has been likened to the futility of preventing the widespread distribution of DeCSS, which enabled DVD ripping.[168][169][170][171] After the US government had Defense Distributed take down the plans, they were still widely available via the Pirate Bay and other file sharing sites.[172] Downloads of the plans from the UK, Germany, Spain, and Brazil were heavy.[173][174] Some US legislators have proposed regulations on 3D printers to prevent them from being used for printing guns.[175][176] 3D printing advocates have suggested that such regulations would be futile, could cripple the 3D printing industry, and could infringe on free speech rights, with early pioneer of 3D printing Professor Hod Lipson suggesting that gunpowder could be controlled instead.[177][178][179][180][181][182]

1
GarudaDarkblack 1 point ago +1 / -0

3D printed guns can't fire higher caliber than. 22LR because they are plastic.

Stop making/buying/selling 80% lowers and start doing 70% lowers.

Buy a machine that cuts aluminum blocks and make your own lowers from scratch. The machine is quite expensive though. Might have to start making them by hand.

1
NullifyAndSecede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Government in its infinite wisdom, mostly highly regulates parts that are most easily produced in plastic on a 3d printer.

You can print Glock frames and AR lowers, and finish the guns with solid steel, unregulated parts.

For the FGC-9 you can produce your own rifled barrel at home without expensive tools.

But yeah, guns that are totally 3d printed (nobody does this except as a political statement) are more dangerous to the operator than the target.