These two hours are a bit much to slog through. Information runs on tweets and memes, which means this stuff needs to be broken down into easy to understand chunks.
But you know, the question, "What are you gonna do about it?" So, do you sue someone? Is this a matter for the courts? They will probably say you don't have standing.
My other question is, if these cybersecurity experts have this information, why doesn't our intelligence agencies, especially the CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), whose head said that this was the most secure election ever, why haven't they said anything? Of course, we probably know the answer to that. Either they are too incompetent, or too corrupt.
These two hours are a bit much to slog through. Information runs on tweets and memes, which means this stuff needs to be broken down into easy to understand chunks.
But you know, the question, "What are you gonna do about it?" So, do you sue someone? Is this a matter for the courts? They will probably say you don't have standing.
My other question is, if these cybersecurity experts have this information, why doesn't our intelligence agencies, especially the CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), whose head said that this was the most secure election ever, why haven't they said anything? Of course, we probably know the answer to that. Either they are too incompetent, or too corrupt.
My FIL and I watched it in full. Pretty easy and very informative.
Well worth the minor effort.
Okay, start making tweets and meme
Sigh.
Sign of the times: the attention span of a mosquito.
Absolutely agree we need this broken down into bite-sized chunks, preferably with an outline.
For your second question: The sheer volume of digital fuckery precludes incompetence from excusing their silence, which leaves the latter option.