Matt Braynard has been on fire! "The evidence continues to amass...."
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (56)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Those fucking monsters deserved to die.
I don't care how sacred life is.
Those people were fucking monsters. When you abduct, rape, beat, kidnap, gang rape, beat, stab, then light a 15 year old girl on fire because her brother owed you 5,000 dollars, you deserve to fucking die.
How many abortions are performed a year? You could consider those executions. Trump's hands are relatively clean when compared, no? At least he killed people that deserved to die.
100% agree.
It blows my mind how these disgusting ass libtards flock to defend these inhuman fucks while they advocate for murdering babies.
Born alive amendment was shot down yesterday. That's some really sick shit.
Wait, what is born alive amendment?
It was an amendment to require care for babies who survive attempted abortions.
You would think that would be easy to get 60 votes right? Nope.
All Republicans voted for it, but only 2 Democrats. Don't get me wrong, RINOs are mostly trash too, but this shouldn't even be a party issue. It's sick.
More Info: https://angelusnews.com/news/life-family/born-alive-amendment-fails-again-in-the-senate/
Wow. I am disappointed to see this. Sad.
God loves all men, but that doesn't mean the evil ones can escape man's justice.
Yea, right. God does not "loves all men". Have you read an actual Bible? God loves those who love Him, and even Jesus said he hates people.
Nut up, and quit spreading that fake, faggot ass hippie christian bull. Real Christianity is ALPHA AF!
Yes and no. God's loves all men, but His love can take the form of divine chastisement. He is all loving and all just, and the wicked will pay for their crimes.
They cant escape God's justice either.
”What? Babies? Fuck ‘em.” it's democrats so that could be taken literally.
Bizarro world. Based doctor I can understand the media failing us. I can understand politicians lying. But I am surprised that so many medical professionals are implicitly going along with this medical tyranny.
My worry, as someone who has been falsley accused and was unable to completely clear my name for reasons that still escape me, is that I would end up being one of those one day. And that's enough for me to be against the death penalty. Going up against the state is a difficult thing.
Here's the thing. I am for the death penalty when it is SOLID that person committed the crime. The guy that killed the people in the Aurora Movie theater. The two men in Connecticut that killed that doctor's wife and two daughters...those kinds of cases. We know they are guilty. They are heinous. They deserve the death penalty.
While I agree that it's solid they committed the crime, it's becoming more and more apparent that they can manipulate the truth to the point where we think we know it for absolute, yet it isn't. Food for thought.
IMO death penalty ONLY when the risk is extreme that they may be able to escape and continue to inflict.
That said, I do believe in more serious non-lethal punishments for the most depraved elements of society. If anything, I think it's better than the death penalty because they'd likely embrace death over it.
What's more, even if they're the most vile "people" around, they can still be useful. If they can pick up a shovel, they can dig.
Instead of costing society more by death penalty-ing them for costing people/society as it is, they should be made to attempt to repay the debt that they have incurred; such a debt cannot be repaid, of course, but the closer they can get the better.
So anyone?
Well of course they are certain that everyone convicted did the thing. But there are cases where people have been sentenced to death and are innocent. When you're innocent, prison is bad enough, losing your only life is unforgivable.
I guess I am talking about the cases where there is absolutely ZERO doubt. I understand that everyone convicted supposedly was guilty, but I would only approve of death sentences where it is undeniable. Example: Dude from Making a Murderer-no death penalty. Guys from Connecticut murders-Death Penalty.
But I get your point, if we aren't a hundred percent certain, should they be in jail? I get it...
You'd still be serving life in prison.
With the possibility of proving my innocence at one point
To torment you while your life wastes away. Execution seems like a mercy to me. I've been imprisoned before although I've never committed a crime and would rather die than face the prospects of life without freedom.
I agree, 100%.
But holy cow. Raping, beating, kidnapping, stabbing, and lighting a 15 year old on fire? Who was that? Because that's really fucked up.