I guess I am talking about the cases where there is absolutely ZERO doubt. I understand that everyone convicted supposedly was guilty, but I would only approve of death sentences where it is undeniable. Example: Dude from Making a Murderer-no death penalty. Guys from Connecticut murders-Death Penalty.
But I get your point, if we aren't a hundred percent certain, should they be in jail? I get it...
You have to have complete faith in a system of government that can barely run an election securely. I don't have that faith, therefore I assume some percentage of convicted criminals are innocent and this extends to death sentence. In all cases though as far as the system is concerned they are 100% guilty.
I guess I am talking about the cases where there is absolutely ZERO doubt. I understand that everyone convicted supposedly was guilty, but I would only approve of death sentences where it is undeniable. Example: Dude from Making a Murderer-no death penalty. Guys from Connecticut murders-Death Penalty.
But I get your point, if we aren't a hundred percent certain, should they be in jail? I get it...
You have to have complete faith in a system of government that can barely run an election securely. I don't have that faith, therefore I assume some percentage of convicted criminals are innocent and this extends to death sentence. In all cases though as far as the system is concerned they are 100% guilty.