741
Comments (52)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
DaddySmooth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed, but not my point. Why did Trump purposely say that to the world?

Don't you find it odd he delayed that speech for over an hour? It's like he knew something was going to happen and protected the crowd.

5
TwistedSister [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's pretty evident. All Pence had to do was not put his imprimatur on the vote and just let it go back to SCOTUS to determine. Why ask such a silly question?

3
DaddySmooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would add - Trump knew Pence would be called a traitor immediately as did Pence. That takes unbelievable courage. Explain to me why Trump is being so quiet now and just walked away. This man was calling out election fraud and the Dominion machines publicly since 2012. You think he was surprised by the fraud?

4
TwistedSister [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

So Trump voicing great displeasure with Pence, you decided that wasn't true, despite the fact Trump used actual words, and instead, you conjure up some position he's never stated, and you prefer to believe that instead?

2
DaddySmooth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm saying, Trump has ALWAYS been three steps ahead of everyone especially his enemies. Name one time they outsmarted him. So you're telling me the man that called out election fraud in 2012 (Romney / Obama) and the voting machines didn't see this coming 10 miles away? Please.

Maybe what you consider "his displeasure" was exactly what he wanted you to think? I'm not saying that's the case 100%. I'm just saying it's very plausible knowing his track record / history. If he was going to take down the cabal and deep state he knows he has one shot. It's not something he could do in steps. It's a one-time chance. Now, did he miss his opportunity? I'm not entirely sure, but I know for certain you and I don't know. What's SILLY is that you "think" you know with 100% certainty.

1
DaddySmooth 1 point ago +1 / -0

I took that statement the exact opposite. To actually put his "imprimatur" on the vote which takes much more courage. Especially considering Pence's past and him staunchly defending the fraud that took place after the election and up to a day before certification. It's like Trump WANTED Pence to certify with the above quote. My quote makes perfect sense if that was the case and definitely plausible. Far from silly.

2
TwistedSister [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump was obviously very upset with the course of action Pence took, but now you're trying to make the case that Trump was secretly very pleased with what Pence did.

That's just silly.

2
DaddySmooth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm saying YOU have no idea what took place and neither do I. However, it appears you're buying into the MSM narrative - Byrne, MSM, Time, etc. Those outlets have done nothing but lie about Trump for 5+ years. Do you really think they are telling the truth now? Give me a break. In fact, they are ALL doing the exact opposite. They are flailing their arms and screeching at a fever pitch. Why? Because they know Trump would never go this quietly, and they are waiting for the other Trump shoe to drop.

What I'm saying is that if you truly watched Trump for the last 15 years he NEVER gives up. And, he's NEVER this quiet. He could be on GAB in a minute and have millions of followers. And he could stop all the speculating and concede. Why hasn't he? If you don't see there's more going on behind the scenes you're the one that's blind and silly. Agree to disagree and we'll see how it plays out.