Yes. You had 2 jets crash into buildings, stripping the support structure of its heat resistant coating, after which the pools of jet fuel burned, heating the underlying metal until it softened enough to no longer be able to bear the weight of the structure (far below the full melting point and replicated multiple times now) causing the collapse. These things did so much damage to the adjacent building 7 that it also collapsed.
Have you ever actually done research into the reports that thoroughly debunk nonsense like this video?
Honest question, how does a jet strip a coating? How then would that one section where the jet fuel was burning then soften the steel so many floors below that the building would collapse like an implosion? I would think that much like the videos of which you speak it would cause the building to lean and topple like a melting candlestick instead of spontaneously implode right into it's own footprint. Just some honest curiosity. I don't know one way or the other but I have a brain and logic and I've never understood this.
How do you think a jet slamming into I-beams covered in basically spray foam would strip that coating off? Seems self explanatory.
Further, you had that specific floor fail, which allowed the weight of the entire rest of the upper portion of the building to drop a full story, smashing into the the floor two stories below, causing a cascading failure as that massive upper weight dropped and slammed into each consecutive floor going down, made easier since the floors were basically a large hollow tube with a central pillar of elevators, with the floors stacked like pancakes on a stick inside a tube. Once one floor failed and the entire upper portion of the building fell and slammed into the lower one, it just pancaked as it fell, basically into the opening of the tube below, which in turn damaged the buildings around it, etc.
From the NIST study;
Based on its comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large number of jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius, or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York City Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower.
NIST video of WTC 7 is also useful, since "truthers" keep clinging to the edited video they have of the collapse (where they often edit out the initial sequence where the roof is seen disappearing first, just like in other steel structure fires since)
Yes. You had 2 jets crash into buildings, stripping the support structure of its heat resistant coating, after which the pools of jet fuel burned, heating the underlying metal until it softened enough to no longer be able to bear the weight of the structure (far below the full melting point and replicated multiple times now) causing the collapse. These things did so much damage to the adjacent building 7 that it also collapsed.
Have you ever actually done research into the reports that thoroughly debunk nonsense like this video?
Honest question, how does a jet strip a coating? How then would that one section where the jet fuel was burning then soften the steel so many floors below that the building would collapse like an implosion? I would think that much like the videos of which you speak it would cause the building to lean and topple like a melting candlestick instead of spontaneously implode right into it's own footprint. Just some honest curiosity. I don't know one way or the other but I have a brain and logic and I've never understood this.
How do you think a jet slamming into I-beams covered in basically spray foam would strip that coating off? Seems self explanatory.
Further, you had that specific floor fail, which allowed the weight of the entire rest of the upper portion of the building to drop a full story, smashing into the the floor two stories below, causing a cascading failure as that massive upper weight dropped and slammed into each consecutive floor going down, made easier since the floors were basically a large hollow tube with a central pillar of elevators, with the floors stacked like pancakes on a stick inside a tube. Once one floor failed and the entire upper portion of the building fell and slammed into the lower one, it just pancaked as it fell, basically into the opening of the tube below, which in turn damaged the buildings around it, etc.
From the NIST study;
https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-studies/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-investigation
See point 6.
Also, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzInIjD6nKw
NIST video of WTC 7 is also useful, since "truthers" keep clinging to the edited video they have of the collapse (where they often edit out the initial sequence where the roof is seen disappearing first, just like in other steel structure fires since)
Here is the NIST story about WTC7: https://youtu.be/PK_iBYSqEsc
Myles Power made a video about WTC7: https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w