1677
Comments (137)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
SomeRandomGuy77 8 points ago +8 / -0

Along the right track, if it were about simply getting rid of oil and gas they'd go with nuclear, but if they went with nuclear they'd undercut their "climate refugees" vector.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
SomeRandomGuy77 4 points ago +4 / -0

Products and services are irrelevant when there's an elite class and slave class, the real minimum wage for all persons is actually 1200 Kcal a day. What's happening as an incidental consequence of neo-liberalism does not at all cover it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
SomeRandomGuy77 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is derivative thinking, creating the system itself is a far better game than taking advantage of the system don't you agree? If it is objectively more profitable to create and alter the system then it's axiomatic that people will do so and have done so. The US is a corporation and you don't control your money supply, this isn't "taught" in schools so not sure what you're talking about there.