They basically just did what they always do. Mike shows evidence of vote flipping etc then the fact checkers explain it away and say it was just one time and it was corrected etc. Mike shows evidence of foreign involvement and NYT just prints a quote from a corrupt “expert” in the DOJ or FBI saying no that didn’t happen. Just like the damning smoking gun video of all the fake ballots under the table they started counting after everyone left. Fact checkers explained that away too saying this is not what it appears to be, this is normal procedure blah blah. And they always appear to be right because they never arrest anyone when they pretend to investigate, everyone is cleared, and we appear to be the conspiracy theorists
They basically just did what they always do. Mike shows evidence of vote flipping etc then the fact checkers explain it away and say it was just one time and it was corrected etc. Mike shows evidence of foreign involvement and NYT just prints a quote from a corrupt “expert” in the DOJ or FBI saying no that didn’t happen. Just like the damning smoking gun video of all the fake ballots under the table they started counting after everyone left. Fact checkers explained that away too saying this is not what it appears to be, this is normal procedure blah blah. And they always appear to be right because they never arrest anyone when they pretend to investigate, everyone is cleared, and we appear to be the conspiracy theorists
Perfect... Really appreciate the response. Sounds about typical.