3920
Comments (147)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can sue anyone for anything, and establishing standing in a defamation suit is pretty straightforward. I'm sure the individuals involved can call upon multiple legal arguments to defend themselves, but standing isn't one of them.

To win a defamation case, Dominion will need to prove actual malice. Good faith accusations and arguments are not going to prove that, so if that's all they have, the people getting sued have nothing to worry about.

1
Chopblock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except that the practical result, demonstrated in front of our very eyes, is that the voting machine conspirators (based on a presumptive but reasonable reading of the evidence that no court has yet seen) have used the legal threats to bully (and/or enable complicit media partners to justify) censorship all discussion about the issue from every terrestrial broadcast and cable network (OAN is online only as far a I know).

1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +1 / -0

These "censored" networks are big boy companies, if they felt Dominion had no case, they could've and should've fought it. Their cowardice is their own failing.