19
posted ago by OG_Phantom_ ago by OG_Phantom_ +21 / -2

I call this shit willful-autism, because you have to force yourself to be fucking retarded to believe it. Like you have to go out of your fucking way to be ignorant. Being this fucking stupid requires effort.

Comments (27)
sorted by:
7
sustainable_saltmine 7 points ago +10 / -3

nothing burns at 400 degrees, dood.

Jet Fuel burns at higher temps and given enough time to build ambient heat, it IS enough to weaken the steel beams which will lead to a collapse. People who think the floors were lined with explosives and the buildings were intentionally dropped with 1,000s of people inside are fucking retarded. I'm sure the government shares some blame in allowing the circumstances that led to it happening but it was MUSLIMS WHO FLEW PLANES INTO THE TOWERS. That is a fact. It WAS a terrorist attack on our "infidel" nation.

So tired of hearing conspiracy theories about muh building 7.

2
OG_Phantom_ [S] 2 points ago +5 / -3

this is chemical fact

and we never said it was explosives

we said it was thermite

and we're still correct about that and we never proven wrong by anyone in fact, in fact we proved it with scale model recreations in fact

https://www.reference.com/world-view/temperature-jet-fuel-burn-e3ad8709cbb3330a

-1
OG_Phantom_ [S] -1 points ago +2 / -3

your explaination was shitty because there has been a good one for this, being that the weight of the stationed plane on the floors acted like it was in a furnace causing a thermite reaction from the liquid alluminum and steel beams chemically mixing

this alone would've caused the free fall of the floors i'm pretty sure even

but obviously this needs to be fact checked

but currently the furnace cooking the alluminum actually sounds accurate and fixes massive holes in the official documents

https://youtu.be/gui_ATdfHx4

3
PotatoJoe 3 points ago +5 / -2

We have a conspiracy win for fucks sake

-2
0
marishiten 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's a chemical fact that you have your own .win for this stupid shit?

THANKS CHEMICAL FACTS. Maybe follow your chemical facts to your conspiracy .win site and leave us along.

Also you're wrong and retarded. The beams were under max load. The heat/damage weakened the beams stressing them beyond their max rating. You don't need to 'melt' the beams. Just weaken them. It's called 'Gravity'. Unless you don't believe in that either. Tell me more about the Earth is flat conspiracy fag.

3
Fignugent 3 points ago +5 / -2

it's not a steel beam, it's a steel beam stressed almost to maximum load NOT BUILT TO WITHSTAND AN EXTRA 400 DEGREES

1
BoffoTheClown 1 point ago +1 / -0

The wtc was designed specifically to withstand impact from aircraft.

This included the resultant jet fuel fires.

1
Fignugent 1 point ago +1 / -0

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

1
OG_Phantom_ [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

that would've caused a different reaction

I think I did just find a suitable explaination to this though in that the plane could've acted like a furnace causing the chemical reactions similar to thermite and even the collapsing floors

https://youtu.be/gui_ATdfHx4

1
Fignugent 1 point ago +2 / -1

not necessary at all

if the plane destroys half the pillars, the remaining ones are carrying twice the load they're supposed to

add any minute amount of heat and it doesn't take MELTING to cause them to fail

1
BoffoTheClown 1 point ago +1 / -0

The plane did not and could not destroy half the pillars. If it had, it would have needed to destroy them symmetrically around the centre of gravity else the building would not fall straight down. There are a large number of structural engineers who signed their names to call out this fraud, despite the personal consequences, and here you are with no expertise or knowledge whatsoever talking down to people as though you have a clue.

You are the sort of person who trusts Fauci.

1
Desktop 1 point ago +2 / -1

PULL IT BABY, PULL IT! (not a sexual reference.... just the words straight from the Larry's mouth.) And where's all the videos of the "plane" hitting the pentagram. I wanted to watch those...

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Here_we_go 1 point ago +3 / -2

Someone triggered from 20yrs ago

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +3 / -2

Holee phock, are you arguing about something that happened 20 years ago?

2
BoffoTheClown 2 points ago +2 / -0

In 2040, will biden become the legit winner of 2020?

1
UrTVisLying2U 1 point ago +2 / -1

Didn't question the story. Then one day in 2009, I saw this. Changed my world forever.

9/11 In Plane Sight

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WNpZEF7WTaNs/

1
zippy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best part was the voice actors script https://invidio.us/watch?v=-tSy2Qi8mr0&t=85s Due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above ...

0
marishiten 0 points ago +2 / -2

You're an embarrassment that understands next to nothing.

Nothing burns at 400F. Nothing. Fuel/propellant need oxygen. That's what keeps it burning. On top of jet fuel not being the only thing that was burning and causing fires.

And you don't need to 'melt steel beams'. You clearly don't understand how metal works. Did you know that when you heat/reheat metal, it becomes brittle and tends to crack and fracture? Did you know that you don't need to 'melt' something under load in order to get it to buckle but to weaken it? Did you know that in huge high rises, the wind is quite a bit stronger than it is on the ground? Did you know that wind is oxygen that fuels propellant?

You didn't? I know you didn't.

You have a weakened structure that is burning causing the metal to soften/weaken that has MILLIONS of tons sitting on top of it. You have fuel that continues to burn and the metal is acting as an insulator further heating it and wind that is providing ample oxygen intake on top of all the insulation and whatever that building was built also burning and melting. It's only a matter of time before the beams buckle from the weight and the weight then becomes too much for the structure to bear and it becomes a domino effect.

Holy fuck, you are fucking stupid if you actually think that it can't happen and you should be ashamed of yourself.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BoffoTheClown 1 point ago +1 / -0

You just said metal was an insulator.

Perhaps if you respond rudely and aggressively, nobody will notice.

0
AlcoholicRetard 0 points ago +1 / -1

9/11 didn’t happen it’s been debunked.

0
Apersonofinterest 0 points ago +1 / -1

2 Jet Planes took out 3 Skyscrapers.

-2
OG_Phantom_ [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Literally the shitty official documentation missed this chemistry fact. For like 19 years now. So at this point it's been whitewashed.

-3
OG_Phantom_ [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

There is enough force going through a jet engine to literally rip your flesh off to the bones, and we will never experience gail force winds that strong on this planet, because it's impossible for our planet to chemically have that reaction.

-3
OG_Phantom_ [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

And further on that, after ripping your flesh off, it would proceed to launch your bones like 400 feet away