Even The Onion does a more professional looking newscast. Why can't these other guys at least match that?
If they ever want to be taken seriously they need to improve their production values about 200%
Okay I've got my flameproof suit on, go ahead and let me have it even though you know I'm right
Obama was a really polished liar. Trump wasn't polished at all.
I'd rather have the unvarnished truth than a pretty lie.
I understand your point completely but that's not the point of my post. If you want to attract mainstream viewership you have to at least have recently polished production standards
You just went through a monologue about how unpolished they are, and then you're saying talking about how unpolished they are isn't relevant.
Okay. Next...
Idiot, you are talking about people I am talking about the presentation of a news program. Two completely different issues.
This is the problem. People like you who do not have critical thinking skills.
Your "critical thinking skills" consists of people who agree with you. That's not how any of this works.
I'm not looking for anyone to agree. Someone can disagree and just say that their production values are just fine. That would be a disagreement. When people point to the fake polish in a person versus the necessary polish in a news production as a reasonable comparison are simply making a straw man argument and not addressing the point. Stop arguing and start thinking about what I'm saying. You can disagree with my position
Dude, I'd rather get my teeth pulled than try to have a conversation with you.
The fact that you just used dude in a sentence tells me I will only be able to have an intelligent conversation with you when you become about 10 years older
What's wrong with a circle jerk around the journalist babes of OAN?
Updoot for a good point
They do look like shit. I won't watch it's 100% cringe. And that Liz wheeler lady was hard to look at.
I'd rather real news and bad production.
That's fair enough but I'm not talking about what we liked. I'm saying that the message needs to get to a broader audience and it's not going to unless we insist that they come across in a more professional way. We want them to succeed.
Maybe they need to hire the right people to do it. But they also might not have the cash to pay extra salaries.
If I was American I'd send them my portfolio, even if they aren't looking to hire anyone. New hires can be costly.
But yeah they just need the right people hired who know what they're doing
Newsmax can go fuck itself.. Yes OAN doesn't have the operating budged of msm but at least for now we get non-left lies and propaganda
You don't need a high operating budget to clean up your production. I've seen better-looking YouTube presentations. Stop making excuses for them. Do what I did write to them and suggest that they spend just a tiny bit of money on a production advisor
They need money and cash infusion from large investors to purchase studio's, camera's, lighting, makeup artists, sound techs, camera operators, etc.
You're talking tens of millions of dollars a year, dude.
CNN and Fox burn though Billions a year and they're owned by media moguls and MASSIVE conglomerations.
Give them a break. They're indie news channels doing the best they can with the funding they can get. It's hard to find investors for conservative news companies that won't bend the knee. So don't expect a huge billion dollar infusion from a venture capitalist into a company that's not publicly traded.
For example, just a single camera that CNN/Fox uses cost easily 40-80 thousand dollars. For one.
I completely get what you're saying but I don't think the onion spends tens of millions of dollars, do you? Take a look at one of their tongue in cheek newscasts.... this is all I'm talking about
It’s all opinion shows everywhere.
True
Downvote. Practice makes perfect. I would rather have unpolished TRUTH than slick LIES. You are a troll and a shill.
Look at my profile before you talk out of your retarded ass.
https://i.imgflip.com/4wzg7i.jpg
Same with Gateway Pundit.
True