3209
Comments (459)
sorted by:
197
PorcupineKing 197 points ago +202 / -5

HEY KAMALA! This is what a real American Black woman looks like

97
Platinum 97 points ago +100 / -3

And one that wouldn't need to cheat to win.

45
Coolgenner 45 points ago +46 / -1

Or suck old dick

2
Pukeahontas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or claim she is both african, indian as well as carribean. Oh I forgot, Native American too

1
Please_Clap 1 point ago +1 / -0

They would just run Stacy Abrahms against her then enable the Dominion voting machines.

4
Uh-hickabuh 4 points ago +9 / -5

Honestly the right needs to start cheating to win. Play them at their own shitty game

8
Daniel644 8 points ago +8 / -0

thats why when ever I reply to a commie I always end the comment with "You Racist Nazi Bigot", I figured they've been calling us all that shit for years, it's time for them to get a taste f their own medicine, fucking commie bootlickers.

2
ActualAdult 2 points ago +2 / -0

I prefer to merely point out their actual racism. It's generally easy, they almost always include some - whether it's a direct attack on people of one skin colour, or assuming incompetence/criminal activity from another.

6
fusreedah 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't think we should cheat, but cheating implies it's a fair democracy. It's not. It's just the getting of power however one can now. So whatevs.

3
pcpoet 3 points ago +3 / -0

doing this will damage the ethics of those who advocate in this way....watch out you dont turn into that you dispise .

1
Uh-hickabuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get that. But playing by the rules only works if everyone is playing by the same set of rules. At a certain point, you play by the dirty rules the team that keeps "winning" is playing by. Or play by the real rules like we do and lose for ever onward.

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

problem is that the reasoning you are using is the same reasoning that those who cheat use....think of it this way cheating works good in the short term and the longer you cheat the worse it works and the more you compromise... if you are going to cheat ask your self can you stop after words and go back...you cant...

-19
Nibba -19 points ago +10 / -29

Bullshit she wouldnt. Guaranteed she is labeled as a yuge uncle tom.

26
Recken 26 points ago +26 / -0

According to the Left she is a White Supremacist. Or is the term multi cultural White Supremacist now?

10
Hung_Chad 10 points ago +10 / -0

Given the stolen election, and staged events leading up to it, everything the left says should now be regarded as deception or noise. Don't take anything they say to heart.

3
Recken 3 points ago +3 / -0

I laughed for awhile, but it ain't funny anymore. I haven't taken anything they say seriously since 2015.

15
Magastein143 15 points ago +22 / -7

Super qualified and liked.... she doesn't even need to point out her race

16
1Bimbo 16 points ago +24 / -8

Do tell what her “super qualifications” are. I’d love to hear it. Because honestly I think this is over the top pandering just for people on the right who desperately need to proclaim they’re not racist. I don’t personally think she’s remotely qualified. So I’d honesty like to know what makes her “super qualified”.

8
FinishTheBorderWall 8 points ago +9 / -1

Maybe she’s not the most “qualified” by historical standards, but she would easily make a better president than Camela.

7
FormerGraveheart 7 points ago +8 / -1

She'd be better than any RINO, probably not as good as the My Pillow guy or the Gab CEO.

4
Tartarian-Kingz 4 points ago +5 / -1

"probably not as good as the My Pillow guy or the Gab CEO."

Correct and we need to choose our leaders carefully beyond "lol first woman" bullshit.

Trump spent decades beating the shit out of worldwide cabals and leaders before 2015, and cucks here wanna push this chick post-trump? For real?

2
NotoriousCIC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our side has become every bit as bad as the left with identity politics but lack the self awareness to see it. You know how many times the last few years we got pedes cheering on the over the top pandering to blacks, gays, or “look we hired so many more women” angle?

1
VolareVia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man you don't get it. We have do exactly what the libs want to own the libs.

1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Yep.

“Let’s fill the party with tons of women, blacks, and gays. That will show em!”

1
Tartarian-Kingz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do not be afraid to keep speaking out.

3
Examiner1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Torba is awesome. I'd vote for him. Lindell worries me. I think he's great but I'm not sure he would do well nationally.

1
Boudicca2 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is not qualified to the president either. And I like him too.

1
DefundMedia45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah.he cowared out just like sellers as a guest host on newsmax when election fraud got brought up.

5
Magastein143 5 points ago +6 / -1

Intelligent, common sense, well informed, & not a politician are qualifications above and beyond most other Presidential candidates, in my book.

4
Spicy_maymay 4 points ago +4 / -0

100%

4
Examiner1776 4 points ago +5 / -1

She's amazing. Listen to her debate. She's insanely smart and tears liberals a new one. She's also impervious to their racial attacks so that's nice.

4
Boudicca2 4 points ago +5 / -1

She has ZERO experience in people management, large business management, financial management, international relations, military or politics. I don't care how smart she seems to you or how she reacts to race attacks. She's not qualified to be the president of any country. She should start in politics by trying for a Congressional seat first.

1
Examiner1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

"She should start in politics by trying for a Congressional seat first."

Thankfully no one said that about Trump.

I agree that she might need some more seasoning, but ultimately I do think she's a great one.

1
fusreedah 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah she's not like Obama where they said "he's so eloquent" and beneath that they meant for a black guy. She's just fucking intelligent and well spoken, constructs her arguments with ruthless efficiency. She has said some dumb shit when she was younger but she's getting better and better all the time.

0
NotoriousCIC 0 points ago +1 / -1

She’s not insanely smart. She’s Charlie Kirk saying shit that anyone else can and tries to dunk on brainwashed college kids but isn’t worth a damn against anyone of merit.

1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure I agree with you, but I'll point out that she's been willing in the past to admit that she got something wrong, changed her viewpoint and attacked the people she was initially supporting for being charlatans.

She didn't try and hide her initial perspective either. That's a lot more integrity than most politicians ever manage.

1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

What exactly is she supposed to say in the digital age? Also, the lawsuits she has been in and is currently in now, point to a career as a con man. Go read her lawsuit with the landlord she didn’t pay rent on and then tried to sue to avoid paying rent.

I despise politicians but I also despise grifters who jump on a movement for their own personal and financial gain.

-2
1Bimbo -2 points ago +1 / -3

Doesn’t make her remotely qualified to be a leader. Put her on a debate team. Put her in the press room. But don’t put her in charge because she has a smart mouth and you impulsively think that makes her a leader Oh and she black so they can’t use race. Omfg.

10
Chinese_spy2 10 points ago +10 / -0
  • American citizen? Check.
  • At least 35 years old at time of inauguration? Check (born in '89).

Candace Owens is thus qualified.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we have a primary candidate so that there is a real primary not a coronation.

6
Lovepede 6 points ago +6 / -0

But she's actually American-Black, not Kenya-black or Indian-black. Her heritage is actually descendants of slaves, not grifting immigrants.

6
Boudicca2 6 points ago +6 / -0

She's not qualified at all. I like her but would never vote for her for president. Ridiculous delusions of grandeur for her to even consider it. At least the GEOTUS has run international businesses, interacted with top politicians for decades and graduated from Wharton.

1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh but she writes tweets and hangs out with Charlie Kirk and she’s black (the real reason why anyone knows her name at all) so she’s “sUpEr QuAliFiEd.”

4
Tartarian-Kingz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe i don't understand your comment but literally 80% of candace owens tweets are race related and pointing out shes black, sometimes inadvertently....

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
8
Corona 8 points ago +10 / -2

Stahp. This is a liberal who's doxing website failed, so she leased her skin tone to the right. The LAST thing we need is another idiot with no experience running for public office.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
NegroSlaveLabor 2 points ago +2 / -0

You wouldn't believe the amount of people on our side who still believe in elections. It's fucking hilarious. We'll get em in 2022/2024!!! I'm sure you will bud, I'm sure you will. We didn't get Trump, I don't want your fucking Candace Owens.

2
NotoriousCIC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you! She’s an absolute fraud and we have too many clowns who fall for her identity politics grab.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fairly certain she changed sides when the doxxing plan was used against her. Also, as Trump proved, people with no experience is exactly what we need.

2
Dreadnot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also what a real Black woman looks like.

85
Bump 85 points ago +92 / -7

If she did something to help get the rightful President back in the White House, that would be a start.

32
ProphetOfKek 32 points ago +49 / -17

Sure, but that is literally impossible for her to do.

-7
Desperado -7 points ago +15 / -22

All you do is sow misery and division. Who the fuck is updooting you, Chang?

2
Darkheartisland 2 points ago +8 / -6

China

1
Desperado 1 point ago +4 / -3

Yep. Or should that be Yip?

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +7 / -6

People with manners.

-6
Desperado -6 points ago +5 / -11

Slink on, snake.

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +5 / -3

Lmao

-6
Desperado -6 points ago +2 / -8

And yet you're not, are you? So tiresome.

-9
Gmoney89 -9 points ago +13 / -22

Exactly, so why even mention that you would run? If Trump can’t get it done, NOBODY CAN!

3
Desperado 3 points ago +22 / -19

Take your three week old account and fuck off with your "nobody can" demoralization.

Sad.

21
DrWhu 21 points ago +24 / -3

Seriously though would you really be okay voting for her? I'm a woman myself but don't exactly feel confident voting in a female president. We need someone strong and unemotional at the helm, willing to make the hard decisions. Women are too empathetic to get stuff done

11
MrsNos 11 points ago +13 / -2

Woman here too, and I agree with the following caveat - a woman can be a great leader BUT only if her supporting group is mostly male. A woman leading a group of women usually ends in a horrendous mess of bitchy infighting and jealousy, and believe me I’ve experienced it first hand to the point I won’t work in a female led team anymore. It’s not saying that it can’t be done but I think the presence of a male (while it sucks for him) can calm the herd somewhat!

Most women are suspicious and judgemental of other women until we know them (yes ladies we are) and the fact the Dems are pushing female teams so much is hilarious. Happy to have a Candace or Ivanka challenge but I’d prefer a man in the top job. Can you imagine the POTUS having to take maternity leave?! The world would laugh, sorry girls you can do it but I don’t want you to.

5
PrettyBear 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. I'm a woman who worked many years in a company headed by a woman. Since working for a woman, I seek out male bosses whenever possible. Female leaders are especially awful to women who are younger and more attractive than they are.

1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

The worst bosses I’ve ever had are female- super petty, a love for drama, favoritism etc.

5
Cacciali_Via 5 points ago +5 / -0

My neighbor has about a dozen laying chickens. A couple were killed by a coyote so he bought replacements. After a few weeks he realized he got a rooster from the breeder by mistake. When he returned the rooster for another hen, all hell broke loose among his hens and they started fighting with each other. Somehow a rooster's presence steadied the group.

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a cock, I can confirm

4
CornPop76 4 points ago +6 / -2

Candace has bigger balls than Biden that's for sure and she doesn't get all caught up in her emotions. She would be my pick for first black president since we know Obama was middle Eastern and Kameltoe is Indian

2
NotoriousCIC 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn’t make a woman a leader in anything as emotions rule everything for them.

1
LOLFuckReddit 1 point ago +3 / -2

You don’t know Candice. I would vote for her in a heartbeat.

1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

Margaret Thatcher has a wry smile on her corpse right now.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +4 / -14
4
Desperado 4 points ago +7 / -3

Thanks for that reply. Now we can all see you're a cringeworthy fag. Good skills.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

We can get it done.

5
sentient-potato 5 points ago +6 / -1

How do you know she's not? There's a movement waiting for a leader, she already has a decent lead.

And she just had a baby.

6
StepItUp 6 points ago +7 / -1

Children make you open to attack. Do what I say or we’ll hurt your kid, literally or otherwise.

2
ActualAdult 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's an interesting point. Many people will fold to protect their children.

You want to elect the ones that will not.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Pepedom 1 point ago +6 / -5

She needs to do something other than just talk. Don't get me wrong, I like what she says but doing is better than talking. She needs to DO something, whether it is in business, law...something significant. She wouldn't last sitting across the table against Xi, Putin, Erdoğan, even Pansy Macron....I don't see it

2
LOLFuckReddit 2 points ago +3 / -1

Stfu and get of your keyboard

1
BrokenBleu 1 point ago +2 / -1

What are YOU doing? If you’re saying she’s doing nothing?

2
Pepedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feeding my baby....not saying I'm thinking of running for president

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
74
KoofNoof 74 points ago +79 / -5

Voting doesn’t even matter anymore. Let’s work on that first

13
NotMyGovernor 13 points ago +16 / -3

Both

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +20 / -9

Don't stop voting. The more we show up at the polls the more they have to cheat.

It may seem futile, but do it anyway. If it's a waste of time it's only a tiny bit. If it's not a waste, we win.

9
ironhorse 9 points ago +14 / -5

That's what they want....for us to give up.

6
unclebobinator 6 points ago +13 / -7

Exactly. Makes me furious when they (us) say voting doesn't matter. Do it fucking anyway, never give up no matter how hopeless it seems.

5
DrWhu 5 points ago +14 / -9

Why the fuck would I lend legitimacy to a system we've just seen can be manipulated to whatever those in power want it to be?

You can talk about voting all you like but you'll never find me at a ballot box again unless something MAJOR is done to give legitimacy to our voting process again, which under Xiden is not likely

9
MAGAsJustBegun 9 points ago +11 / -2

Presidential elections are conducted on a state level. That's why people shouldn't stop voting.

Plenty of states DON'T have corrupted election systems by design

Florida is an example of a state that has continued the work to further legitimize their election system

So to say the whole system is broken isn't quite true. Many states, yes.

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't hear about legislation they're passing for future elections, did you? Only someone ignorant of current events would be comfortable with your line of thinking. Go watch Absolute Proof, then take a look at recent house legislature. Dominion, Smartmatic, etc, etc, they're going to be everywhere. Not that they even have to be. The few states that may still be somewhat legitimate don't even matter. Do you realize Joe Biden literally won less than 500 counties nationwide?

1
MAGAsJustBegun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, I'm well aware of all that. I'm going to do what is in my power to prevent that crap from happening, but no matter what happens, I'm always going to continue to vote.

If we boycott voting, they won't even have to cheat to wipe the floor with us.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WeCax49 1 point ago +4 / -3

You're a coward. Complete and utter coward. You roll over to the Dems and let them take everything from you. They're drooling over the fact that people like you do nothing to secure our elections, and then do nothing to stop their tyranny

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, fuck you. They stole this election. Fuck pretending like my vote matters NEXT time around. You're no different than those Q retards with their dicks in their hands

1
BurnLootMurder2020 1 point ago +3 / -2

To force them to waste more money setting up another steal? Isn't that at least better than just handing it to them? Even the gloomiest of doomers should realize how much money had to be spent to accomplish what they just did.

2
DrWhu 2 points ago +2 / -0

jUsT vOTe HarDer

Why do you think their pockets will dry up come the next election?

0
christianknight 0 points ago +1 / -1

They run the banks. They will just print or steal more!

0
unclebobinator 0 points ago +6 / -6

Ok doomer

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +2 / -1

This rhetoric cracks me the fuck up. "It doesn't matter that they own the machines, keep feeding them!!!!" Do you even know how Dominion works? Your BALLOT is NOT stored. It's converted into data, and the data is altered. Then the ballot is destroyed and forensics teams are discovering CHANGE/SYSTEM LOGS DELETED. There is no record you ever voted for Trump.

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nah, what they wanted was the election. And they got it. They can just keep censoring us.

3
Examiner1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

Exactly. I cannot stand these "I'm never voting again" people. We also have to win on the state and local level too. We can sweep them out of the house and senate in 2 short years if people will stop pouting like a bunch of crybabies.

Get involved in local politics. Start by sweeping liberals out of your local school boards where all of the leftist brainwashing starts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Examiner1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

No idea why you are being downvoted for the truth. All of these boycott people are idiots.

2
christianknight 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yea...no. This is so pointless its laughable.

1
unclebobinator 1 point ago +2 / -1

It literally takes a few minutes to vote, even if it's pointless you lose nothing. Or give up like a pussy while every Dem votes and they don't even need to bother to cheat to win.

I'm sure your doomer and defeatist attitude is really beneficial to the movement. Even Trump or Don Jr will encourage you to go out and vote. I'd bet 1400 on him saying that next election, if he gets involved.

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is no movement, Bob. Trump is out. They rigged it and won and SILENCED us. No one is doing anything. Illegals are flooding into the country and will be granted citizenship, they will be voting blue. And guess what else, those Dominion machines. Yeah, they're gonna be there next election too. Dooming =!= facing reality. Take a look at recent house legislature, they're legalizing the steal. But if voting makes you feel good in fantasy land, go for it. You're not doing much more than Q-anons striking off to hopium.

0
Dravous 0 points ago +3 / -3

this is very good point. plus, we've seen how they cheat now. we're already getting out ahead of the next one. and while I'm still expecting them to cheat, we have to realize the degree they have to cheat to win is insane.

as more and more people get redpilled, they will simply be unable to cheat hard enough to win.

3
christianknight 3 points ago +3 / -0

They used Dominion machines that conjured up votes through keystrokes. You cant beat a computer.

0
WeCax49 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Dominion stuff isn't true. Dominion was used in 2016, was it rigged in favor of Trump?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh so just like that with one swipe you dismiss all the evidence? GREAT

5
JudicialDredd 5 points ago +5 / -0

1 vote for trump. 37,862 for biden.

2 votes for trump. 763,973 for biden.

We're wearing em down now gents! Don't give up!

3
MAGAsJustBegun 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's somewhat true, and yes, we need to fight for fair elections. But that doesn't mean we should boycott voting either.

1
NegroSlaveLabor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree. Fuck anyone who still votes. These people obviously did not watch the Absolute Proof video and don't realize dominion and its ilk will dominate ALL future elections, not just the main swing states they focused on this time around. They've got into the machines and can make live changes anywhere they need. "But we won Florida/Texas!" yeah, because they didn't need them to win. If they did, they would've flipped those, too. FUCK voting. Do not lend legitimacy to a rigged system. THIS was the last stand. Anyone who suggests to continue playing pattycake and voting in future elections is a retarded shill. I don't care. They stole THIS election. Why are you sitting around with your fingers in your ears talking about NEXT election? FUCK YOU!

47
noxousx 47 points ago +62 / -15

I like Candace, but I don't think she's qualified. We'll see how things look for her in 20-30 years.

44
MrJethro 44 points ago +48 / -4

Vastly more qualified than the commie traitors jo and the ho and barry the fairy

10
noxousx 10 points ago +10 / -0

There's no doubt about that.

22
Fenuuk 22 points ago +29 / -7

i disagree i think the main factor is patriotism

17
Tartarian-Kingz 17 points ago +18 / -1

Lol thats not AT ALL the only thing thats needed and this movement will get destroyed if people think thats all.

Trump and candace are very very far apart in accomplishments, trump was already beating other world leaders in the business world for decades.

4
Fenuuk 4 points ago +6 / -2

i think you underestimate how fecal and shallow this world is unfortunately nobody cares about morality or achievements anymore

5
DrWhu 5 points ago +5 / -0

We definitely need a man in charge

6
Forbidden_outcast 6 points ago +6 / -0

Men with children

Screw all of these world leaders who have no children, and pretend they want to guide humanity,

when they can’t even cooperate with a spouse and children in their own homes

3
MAGAsJustBegun 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd have rather had Marjorie as Trumps VP than Pence.

And Sidney Powell as FBI director than most men.

I get where you're coming from, but I wouldn't look past all women. Some are strong and deserving.

Most? I don't think so. That goes with men too, but men have been humanities leaders for all of humanity. Because men lead armies.

Women don't. Because men are simply more qualified to fight wars.

0
BrokenBleu 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump had power because he was rich, Candace is not rich. I’m sure if Candace was a wealthy business woman too, she would have the versatility as Trump. I love Trump, but this is dumb to say. Keep in mind, Trump’s dad was also successful so naturally he had a head start. This does not make her unqualified. When I think of a leader, they need to have strong demeanour, knows how to put their foot down and be educated. She checks all the boxes.

3
Tartarian-Kingz 3 points ago +3 / -0

List me the times candace won over actual foreign lands to build her buildings and hire her employees from america in foreign lands.

You think bankers, and leaders with billions in funds fear a person who isnt a millionaire herself?

You think people who voted trump would vote for this grifter?

2
NotoriousCIC 2 points ago +3 / -1

Candace Owens is the epitome of a grifter and our side has become so GD stupid when it comes to identity politics that we fall for this stuff. “sHe Is bLAcK sO tHeY cAnT cAlL mE rAcIsT.”

1
Tartarian-Kingz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Preach

-2
BrokenBleu -2 points ago +1 / -3

Trump. Had. Money. 👏

1
Tartarian-Kingz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump BEAT entire countries to build and develop both in America and outside you ignorant fuck

-1
BrokenBleu -1 points ago +1 / -2

You’re a fucking moron. Trump had money you dumb fuck. He wouldn’t of been able to do any of that if he didn’t have money. Clown.

9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
5
Fenuuk 5 points ago +8 / -3

i simply could not give a fuck about that i want a america first agenda and i think Candice wont be muh racist out of votes

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that is not going to be enough to implement change. We need someone who is not only a Patriot, not only tough enough to handle the pressure, but also someone who could take out the deep state.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
10
Platinum 10 points ago +11 / -1

I think she'd be good as House Speaker or Vice President.

4
Manofmanytrades 4 points ago +4 / -0

In these times, qualified basically = deep state

3
Equality72521 3 points ago +3 / -0

She is not qualified because she is not old enough.

According to Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Chinese_spy2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Inauguration is Jan. 2025, making her at least 35 years of age upon claiming office.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
35
Tommyjoe2 35 points ago +35 / -0

CNN: why a woman of color running for president is actually racist

8
maga_mama_757 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yes, I can see that. They've already come up with a label for poc maga people: "multiracial Whiteness."

25
PrettyBear 25 points ago +26 / -1

I’d much rather see DeSantis as president.

10
unclebobinator 10 points ago +10 / -0

My man DeSantis will pretty much always have my vote.

1
Chinese_spy2 1 point ago +3 / -2

From his physical appearance, I was expecting DeSantis to have a deeper voice.

Nevertheless, team DeSantis here.

...Unless (or until?) he shows his true backstabbing self like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul: muh no election fraud.

6
WeCax49 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ted Cruz and Rand Paul both said there was election fraud.

2
Chinese_spy2 2 points ago +2 / -0

My mistake. There was a story about Ted Cruz arguing that President Trump was ignorant in his claim of election fraud. Fake news?

Nevertheless, action speak louder than words: Cruz did vote to oppose the certification of Arizona and Pennsylvania unless a 10-day audit could be performed.

Rand Paul voted against the audit: "The vote today is not a protest; the vote today is literally to overturn the election! Voting to overturn state-certified elections would be the opposite of what states’ rights Republicans have always advocated for," Paul tweeted after a mob stormed the Capitol.

2
TakenusernameA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ted Cruz actually voted to stop the steal, Rand greenlit it.

4
PrettyBear 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ted Cruz is wimpier and is preoccupied with climbing the social ladder. DeSantis is more of a leader.

24
overblod 24 points ago +28 / -4

She is in cahoots with former elitist Never Trumpers, be aware

12
unclebobinator 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yup. She may have taken the red pill, but something about her comes off as self serving and insincere.

Let her start with a house seat and go from there.

6
warlord1 6 points ago +7 / -1

She associates with Shapiro’s gailywire. Other than that, she’s super based.

1
Train_w_no_brakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I don’t think I’d ever vote for her. She smells like grifter to me

19
Prudentwait 19 points ago +19 / -0

I like her but I'd prefer someone who doesn't virtue signal about not virtue signaling about their race constantly. She's made being a "black conservative" a gimmick and I'm not a fan of that.

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +11 / -0

If I had a dollar everytime she said the word "plantation" I could buy the presidential election myself.

2
DongSquad420 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, she knows her shit, but she needs other ways to get her message through to people. She's not a good red pill dispenser

14
TerryBibble 14 points ago +15 / -1

No

5
Genericwhitemale 5 points ago +5 / -0

If we have to have a woman as President it better be Kristi Noem.

12
swutalk 12 points ago +20 / -8

Way Too SOON. need a little life experience!

10
deleted 10 points ago +17 / -7
20
BunnyPicnic 20 points ago +23 / -3

Precisely. We've followed the "you need experience to run a country" bullshit for too long. I want plumbers, inventors, mechanics, engineer's, doctors (medical doctors, Jill), carpenters, FARMERS to be represented in Congress. What is the occupation of most senators and reps? It's gotta be lawyers right? Fuck that noise, get them out. The constitution is not that hard to understand. Our laws were meant to be simple, easy for everyone to understand. Now, they are filled with lawyer jargon and have so much irrelevant bullshit mixed in, it's exhausting for dumb people like me.

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Trump is the first president in decades to be a lawyer. Reagan was the last before him.

1
Chinese_spy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. I am thoroughly tired of being represented by lawyer-by-profession politicians; I want business owners to rise in politics -- or tradespeople.

1
BrokenBleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Life experience has gotten us corrupt politicians on the left, and a VP who sucked a lot of dick to get where she did.

Wow!

10
noxousx 10 points ago +11 / -1

It got us Trump.

2
swutalk 2 points ago +3 / -1

you can turn that around also. Look at what Lack of life experience has gotten us also? None of our politicians have any real world experience and they are all fucking idiots!

4
unclebobinator 4 points ago +4 / -0

AOC and the rest of the squad as an example of lack of experience.

We need experience, but also patriotism. Which so few politicians believe in. Let's see we have Trump, MTG, Hawley, who else?

1
c0mpl3x 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gaetz

0
unclebobinator 0 points ago +1 / -1

Gaetz blasted Trump for Jan 6.

Fuck him and his giant ass forehead

0
Tartarian-Kingz 0 points ago +3 / -3

Experience gave us trump but ok

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
Tartarian-Kingz 1 point ago +3 / -2

Smh

0
unclebobinator 0 points ago +1 / -1

I know. Some people these days. This place is becoming more and more idealistic and doomer filled since Nov 7

4
SimpleGoy 4 points ago +6 / -2

I agree man. But look at the other comments. They want a black woman with no experience at the wheel. Look how hard it was for Trump. Our side filled with idiots, evidenced by all them saying they would vote for her.

4
Tartarian-Kingz 4 points ago +4 / -0

This lol its embarrassing

11
SimpleGoy 11 points ago +14 / -3

GROSS! This country is lost if this is the best we can do. Literally the right wants to be cucked.

5
unclebobinator 5 points ago +6 / -1

Did you see them during the Obama years? They had the senate and did fuck all. Goddamn uniparty.

-1
WeCax49 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What did you want them to do under Obama? They blocked a court nominee and sent Obama loads of bills which he vetoed. Aside from that, there's literally nothing they can do.

3
unclebobinator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Impeach him for being an illegitimate president for starters

0
WeCax49 0 points ago +1 / -1

MTG has already introduced articles of impeachment, but it won't lead to anything until they win the house back in 2022. At which point, I do believe that Biden will be impeached.

7
snuggs316 7 points ago +7 / -0

i'd like to see her run for the senate. she's not ready for the wh.

6
rich77 6 points ago +8 / -2

Please don't. We don't need another "baste black patriot" feigning support for this country

6
highenergywinning 6 points ago +11 / -5

nah stay where you are

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
1
Chinese_spy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha.

Painfully true, though.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
Chinese_spy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Indeed. Just watch that "debate" between Candace Owens and Blair White, with Dave Rubin moderating. Owens debates like a lefty: ad hominem.

1
BrokenBleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think she’s a grifter at all. If this was about advancing her political career, she would be a Democrat and ass kissing them. Since she’s been supportive of the right, and openly about it. She’s been attacked by ANTIFA. Slandered as a white supremacist who hates her own skin colour, and so forth. And I’m pretty sure she has said in the past she was never a Democrat, of is she was it was temporarily - can’t remember.

5
ProState 5 points ago +6 / -1

No thanks.

5
ILoveSilk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fix the election fraud first. Otherwise many people including myself won't donate a penny to anyone or vote

5
Taupkek 5 points ago +7 / -2

Perfect candidate? Nope. Better than anyone on the left and many on the right? Absolutely! I'd prefer her over Cruz, Rubio, Christie, any number of others who abandoned trump, and us, when needed.

1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think she'd make it through the primaries.

She may make an excellent running mate for someone like Cruz though. He'll draw the mainstream support and she'll steal support from the Democrats while giving many people suspicious of Cruz a level of comfort that there'll be an element of control on him.

1
Taupkek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am soured on Cruz, probably permanently, certainly as a candidate for office. He was first in line to throw Trump under the bus over the latest impeachment nonsense. I'm kind of moving into the non-politician for office way of thinking.

4
OMC-RADIO 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd vote for Candace, but Dominion wouldn't... so there's that.

0
WeCax49 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dominion was used in 2016 and allowed Trump.

1
OMC-RADIO 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right, it was.

Back then, they didn't compensate enough for Trump and were overwhelmed by the turnout against hillary. They figured it out and completely owned the media too when 2018 rolled around. No mainstream media even suspected cheating and most people's views were still pretty malleable. Last November, cheating was perfected so well that even Jesus wouldn't have been elected.

The trouble is, there were so many MORE Trump voters than last time and they had to scramble at the end and shut down 7 states from counting so they could do the cheat. They still got away with it... so far. At this point, why should we trust any future elections knowing that there is a well organized group of people orchestrating the cheat? Only their people, democrats or controlled opposition will be allowed to hold office.

It's all just a show now.

3
WeCax49 3 points ago +3 / -0

Perhaps you're right: My question is, what are you going to do to ensure your vote is protected?

1
OMC-RADIO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that is a great question. Thankfully, my state isn't compromised like Georgia, Michigan or Arizona. Still, I plan on volunteering as a poll worker of some sort. What is concerning is will they demonize non-democrats and label them as terrorists so only their people can work the polls?

We already know how far they are willing to go.

How far are we willing to go?

4
Spawnlingman 4 points ago +6 / -2

Do it. Me and my entire racist white family will vote for you.

3
stonepony 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should never elect another professional politician again.

Candace would do a fantastic job.

3
TheWinningNeverStops 3 points ago +4 / -1

There is no election anymore sorry.

0
WeCax49 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah alright, just keep complaining or actually do something about it?

3
fidgetymidget 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll vote for her, unless Trump is running of course.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BrokenBleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
-1
ActualAdult -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's a bigoted sexist statement.

Women can run a country. Women have successfully run countries. A given woman may or not may be able to, but that's true of men too.

Here's a hint for you: When Harris utterly fucks the US senseless, it's not because she's a woman.

0
deleted 0 points ago +0 / -0
1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am a woman

No. You are a sexist woman.

There have been multiple successful female leaders, of countries and of large organisations. That you feel you lack the capability is perfectly reasonable, but judging everybody else against your own shortcomings is indeed bigoted.

There is such a small percentile of women that would be suited and none of them would run for the job

There's a teensy tiny percentage of men that would be suited and let's face it, the current incumbent is hardly a shining fucking example. Maybe more capable women would run for office if they didn't have to spend all their time defending themselves from idiotic sexists going "you can't do that because you're a woman".

its like, women cant pass marines standards they have to get lowered

I fully support requiring women to demonstrate the same capabilities and skills as men where those are part of the job. Are you really saying that men are better than women at being nice to people, at lying convincingly, at putting aside personal integrity and at using their charm to extract money from people?

ts an observation from watching how women perform in general

Look, just because Nancy comes across as a corrupt snake and AOC gets dizzy spells if she hasn't told a lie for the last 8 minutes doesn't mean that there aren't also good strong female role models.

Take Liz Truss in the UK, widely mocked and taunted by 'the establishment', shoved into a low profile ministerial post, given few resources and.. has delivered literally dozens of trade deals in the last year.

What was that? A female politician that's getting things done, quietly, efficiently, effectively, without criticism or drama? No wonder you've never heard of her, she's busy getting on with performing well.

its the same reason there are less CEO's of huge companies, they cant hack it

Of course they can hack it - this is why there are indeed female CEOs of huge companies. That most women are too damn sensible to work 90 hour weeks and sacrifice their home and family life in pursuit of a career does not mean they couldn't, it means they chose not to.

the women that can hack it aren't interested. so calm your tits.

A woman that may be able to hack is interested but your response is "she can't hack it because she's a woman". I'll calm my tits when you stop writing people off because they have some.

0
deleted 0 points ago +0 / -0
1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't write it for you. I wrote it so that there's a record on here of your sexist silliness being called out.

You don't have to read it. You probably should though, you need the education.

0
deleted 0 points ago +0 / -0
3
Redred 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry but We need Trump in the WH ASAP!

3
somedickinohio 3 points ago +4 / -1

Please try Senator/Congresswoman first.

1
unclebobinator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Senate is congress.

House and Senate combined is considered the Congress.

She should start locally or in the house first.

3
CommieSlayer_147 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn shame I don’t believe in political solutions anymore. I might have considered voting for her, whatever the hell “voting” means anymore.

3
UnidentifiedWhiteMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now there's a 1st female president we can be proud of!

3
AussieConservative 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Candace runs as Republican im back on board. Just primary out the rinos before 2024

2
MAGAsJustBegun 2 points ago +2 / -0

I support Candace, but a small part of me thinks she's another face of Conservative Inc.

I'd certainly vote for her, and I think it would be very interesting to see how they'd spin it as racism to have a black woman leaf the GOP ticket.

It would all be very fun to see!

2
Boudicca2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like her. But no. She has no business running for president.

2
Artek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell yeah, I'd be down with Candace.

2
strawberryismyjam 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without election integrity, it won't matter.

2
1776grandma 2 points ago +2 / -0

President Owens love the sound of that.

2
BaltimoreCrew 2 points ago +2 / -0

She’s been schooling black folks on the real history of the democrat party. They’ll do everything in their power to keep her on a Twitter echo chamber vs CNN, 60 Minutes and Late Night Talk shows for 4 years living inside their host’s brains.

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Run with Matt Gaetz

The two of you could clap back on twitter and absolutely destroy the left

You could insult comic your way to the presidency

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could debate AOC and Bernie Sanders!

2
CindyMaga2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please do it!!! I would vote for you in a heartbeat!

2
PresidentSelectBiden 2 points ago +5 / -3

Trump / Owens 2024?

2
unclebobinator 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. Hawley instead of Owens.

2
Genericwhitemale 2 points ago +2 / -0

Desantis/Noem 2024

1
Chinese_spy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Governors, yes. They have experience in the executive position.

Senators and Representatives? No such experience -- all they do is talk, talk. Go on cable news and talk, talk. Have hearings to talk and talk -- need that "witty" soundbite for re-election.

2
Hexagon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like they would let her win. Like they are only gonna steal from Trump. Like they can help themselves when it is so easy.

2
Pompelulu 2 points ago +2 / -0

She should start locally all the way up like all of us. It would be too easy for them to shoot her down before she even get started if she aims straight at president. She would need a large horde of friendly swamp creatures at the highest level to get a chance

2
groypedagain 2 points ago +2 / -0

WOW A GRIFTER WANTS YOUR SUPPORT AFTER 2020 PROVED ELECTIONS WILL NEVER BE LEGITIMATE.

I'd just like to remind everyone in here drooling about which BASED CELEBRITY you'd "vote" for- if they win, they were chosen to win. Not by you, not by "we the people", but by the ones who choose. There is no point in wasting your time or energy on people like this.

2
Trumpticusprime 2 points ago +4 / -2

What a racist bitch.

2
ThePhilosopher 2 points ago +2 / -0

The DemonRats are gonna just cheat..... again.

2
Tenspot20 2 points ago +2 / -0

She only has two things going against her, and neither are Democrats.

2
Zippythekid 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love Candace but don’t think she’s ready. Her thoughts and intentions are that of a freedom loving American but I find her presentation awkward. In tweets and clips awesome but not developed enough to be inspiring which I think is needed right now.

2
kmilt16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed.

2
A1waysLurk1ing 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was a far left blogger only a few years ago.

2
hillaryprison 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's a bit young. She's far superior to someone like AOC, but she has a lot to learn about management. She also makes everything about race which is a bit overboard.

2
ArtistWarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

NO.

NO.

NO.

1
Ralphusthegreatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elections are only for show. Our votes don't count.