Mike lindell does in his videos recently. Edit does not say it. His interviewee the col. Phil guy incenuates that a private equity firm from china influences the dominion board. I cannot reproduce the words but it's at 15 minute mark on his absolute proof video.
They're loosely tied to the Chinese by a holding company that's owned by another company that China has stake in.
It's circumstantial.
They don't have to be owned by China though to cause damage. They're for sale by the highest bidder. They purposefully leave open exploits in their software (weighted voting) so people with motivation can cause vote tamper.
In the US, a vote is a vote. There should be no fractional vote option, yet the option exists in their UI to do just that. There's also a way to force the scanners to manually adjudicate where you can literally change the votes on a ballot. I understand why this exists (in the event the scanner can't read it or the person filling it out was sloppy), but there should be a threshold and you shouldn't be able to change the votes in the software itself. It should reject the vote if it can't read it, set it to 'adjudication' meaning you're told to set the vote aside and contact the person who the vote belongs and have them come back in and correct the ballot. Every vote scan should have a serial number/3D barcode so you have to rescan the same ballot for it to be accepted. If another is ballot is used, then it errors out. It also should be time sensitive.
$400 Million SEC Filing Links Dominion, UBS, and China
https://www.ntd.com/400-million-sec-filing-links-dominion-ubs-and-china_536295.html
Nobody says it's owned by China.
Ok the security professional hes interviewing said it but not in those words. This is the absolute proof video.
Mike lindell does in his videos recently. Edit does not say it. His interviewee the col. Phil guy incenuates that a private equity firm from china influences the dominion board. I cannot reproduce the words but it's at 15 minute mark on his absolute proof video.
No, he says China hacked the system.
Just following up on it.
Nobody says China owns Dominion. Where are you getting that from?
Lmao, I've never heard that one either. I guess you could argue the dems are owned by china and they own Dominion, lol.
Ok ill listen to it again to double check.
They're loosely tied to the Chinese by a holding company that's owned by another company that China has stake in.
It's circumstantial.
They don't have to be owned by China though to cause damage. They're for sale by the highest bidder. They purposefully leave open exploits in their software (weighted voting) so people with motivation can cause vote tamper.
In the US, a vote is a vote. There should be no fractional vote option, yet the option exists in their UI to do just that. There's also a way to force the scanners to manually adjudicate where you can literally change the votes on a ballot. I understand why this exists (in the event the scanner can't read it or the person filling it out was sloppy), but there should be a threshold and you shouldn't be able to change the votes in the software itself. It should reject the vote if it can't read it, set it to 'adjudication' meaning you're told to set the vote aside and contact the person who the vote belongs and have them come back in and correct the ballot. Every vote scan should have a serial number/3D barcode so you have to rescan the same ballot for it to be accepted. If another is ballot is used, then it errors out. It also should be time sensitive.
I think China is just one of those that the dems outsourced the vote manipulation to.