3216
Comments (171)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
32
NazisWereSocialist 32 points ago +32 / -0

“Due to a risk of violence” it’s almost as if losing the consent of the governed causes a risk of violence...

16
kwqt 16 points ago +16 / -0

“Due to a risk of violence” is the new "white supremacy".

Every other month, they invent a new smear to throw at whoever disagrees with the billionaire government.

2
SteelBallRun1890 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reading this makes me think we need to come up with a name for us... they used Resist and Resistance for orang man bad and pussy hat shit that was made up but we really are now living under a false gov picked and ruling by the elite of the elites. It's like an 80's dystopian novel.

12
Skyrison 12 points ago +12 / -0

they SHOULD be afraid of violence imo! they SHOULD be afraid of the people to rise up and do something, like people have throughout history. enough of this "wah wah wah he said something VIOLENT" shit. over in france, the yellow vests are still throwing rocks at government buildings, at his motorcade when it goes past, saying they'll rip macron limb from limb if he shows his face, and still spit and shit on his doorstep and stuff LOL.

stop letting them use the whole "THEY ARE BEING VIOLENT" thing as a thing to stop you from being upset! why is it ok for the left to burn down city blocks and smash the SHIT out of businesses and steal stuff, and kill people for a cause, but it's not ok for the other side?

fuck em. im done

5
AnointedVisions 5 points ago +6 / -1

What I find infuriating about that is you can promote BLM all day with no censorship but BLM is directly responsible for tons of violence. But talking about elites manipulating the election is a "risk" of violence.

I want to see Jack hanged