464
Comments (5)
sorted by:
7
Bennn 7 points ago +7 / -0

You mean the Senate where Kamala can tie-break everything in favor of the Democrats ? That Senate ?

5
p1smo 5 points ago +5 / -0

50 years ago, if anyone had tried to pass a law giving some unelected panel of globalist bureaucrats power over American sovereignty they would have been tarred and feathered and run out of town until they hit the coast. I can't imagine what's going through the heads of the Greatest Generation to watch our country devolve into the very thing they fought against.

3
Barbs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their “commitments” are the same as the ones we bowed out on, paying ungodly sums of money for 3rd world nations to do jack shit.

As soon as we said “fuck it” and bailed on the Accord, France and Germany also balked, because now they were on the hook for the entire cost. They were like “nah, we’re not interested if the US taxpayer isn’t paying for most of it.”

You know how it goes.

3
Drinkup4 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only purpose of these agreements is to cripple the US. No one else ever follows them. Just like how none of the NATO members outside the US ever paid their agreed upon amount.

1
MrPoorRichard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Treatys require a 2/3 senate vote.