Profitsgate: A simple term coined to define the active investigation being done by independent journalists into silicon valley allowing violent depths of rampantly expanding child pornography networks to operate on surface net social media like, facebook, twitter, and other such mainstream networks, which evidence has proven have sometimes been active for years at a time upon discovery and mass appeal for bans and removal, police investigations, and how law enforcement actively blockades investigations into pedophelia related to this.

"The material wasn’t taken down until the Department of Homeland Security stepped in. It had accrued over 167,000 views and 2,223 retweets, the complaint noted."

"Twitter Profited From the Abusive Content Haba went on to claim that Twitter profited from not removing her client’s abuse videos.

“When you look at the profit structure that Twitter has, they profit from every single time that these ads are disseminated, retweeted, viewed. There’s a huge advertising incentive and data licensing incentive for these ads to stay, these material to stay up. So Twitter certainly was profiting off the exploitation of John Doe.”"

https://www.ntd.com/twitter-refused-to-take-down-child-sex-abuse-content-and-profited-off-it-lawyer_563892.html

But this misses a point

Silicon valley as a whole is actively profiting off of tolerance of surface net, open door, publically accessible, and massively sized child pornography networks, and have been repeatedly plastered in the news for refusing to remove this extremely fucking ILLEGAL content.