But not a Rand Paul party. If you want to move the goalpost, then concede your loss on the first point and make another statement that we can debate next.
I haven’t lost anything, I’m posing an alternative should Trump not take the role many are expecting. Remember Rand positioned the vote for Trump to win the upcoming impeachment, the two are building a coalition.
You suggested that you were just "Taking a Poll, who would be interested in Rand Paul should he take the lead ?"
What you really intended was to persuade people that your choice was the best choice. Rand Paul is not a party leader, you have ZERO evidence to support this claim. NO one is lining up for a Rand Paul party, not even his fellow LIbertarians (who he continuously ghosts and friend-zones because he knows he can't carry the party). The response thus far to your "poll" (lol) has been not just no, but fuck no. So again, Rand Paul, fuck no.
What has that got to do with Rand? The poll was in reference to a political party led by Trump, not by Rand Paul.
The numbers to support a 3rd party, Libertarian Party
But not a Rand Paul party. If you want to move the goalpost, then concede your loss on the first point and make another statement that we can debate next.
I haven’t lost anything, I’m posing an alternative should Trump not take the role many are expecting. Remember Rand positioned the vote for Trump to win the upcoming impeachment, the two are building a coalition.
You suggested that you were just "Taking a Poll, who would be interested in Rand Paul should he take the lead ?"
What you really intended was to persuade people that your choice was the best choice. Rand Paul is not a party leader, you have ZERO evidence to support this claim. NO one is lining up for a Rand Paul party, not even his fellow LIbertarians (who he continuously ghosts and friend-zones because he knows he can't carry the party). The response thus far to your "poll" (lol) has been not just no, but fuck no. So again, Rand Paul, fuck no.