I haven’t lost anything, I’m posing an alternative should Trump not take the role many are expecting. Remember Rand positioned the vote for Trump to win the upcoming impeachment, the two are building a coalition.
You suggested that you were just "Taking a Poll, who would be interested in Rand Paul should he take the lead ?"
What you really intended was to persuade people that your choice was the best choice. Rand Paul is not a party leader, you have ZERO evidence to support this claim. NO one is lining up for a Rand Paul party, not even his fellow LIbertarians (who he continuously ghosts and friend-zones because he knows he can't carry the party). The response thus far to your "poll" (lol) has been not just no, but fuck no. So again, Rand Paul, fuck no.
I thought you were taking a poll? Am I not invited because you can't support your position against my opposition to it? If you were just taking a poll, you wouldn't argue. Normally the method to poll is to ask a question, gather the data, and report the results. If you want to go a step further, you could use the results to help you form a conclusion. It seems like you did that all backwards.
Thanks for directing me elsewhere, but I think I'll just continue to post where I want.
I haven’t lost anything, I’m posing an alternative should Trump not take the role many are expecting. Remember Rand positioned the vote for Trump to win the upcoming impeachment, the two are building a coalition.
You suggested that you were just "Taking a Poll, who would be interested in Rand Paul should he take the lead ?"
What you really intended was to persuade people that your choice was the best choice. Rand Paul is not a party leader, you have ZERO evidence to support this claim. NO one is lining up for a Rand Paul party, not even his fellow LIbertarians (who he continuously ghosts and friend-zones because he knows he can't carry the party). The response thus far to your "poll" (lol) has been not just no, but fuck no. So again, Rand Paul, fuck no.
So just move along to another thread, it’s really that simple
I thought you were taking a poll? Am I not invited because you can't support your position against my opposition to it? If you were just taking a poll, you wouldn't argue. Normally the method to poll is to ask a question, gather the data, and report the results. If you want to go a step further, you could use the results to help you form a conclusion. It seems like you did that all backwards.
Thanks for directing me elsewhere, but I think I'll just continue to post where I want.
Blah blah blah