I remember someone said to me the same thing about ACB. I questioned why Trump would want a virtue-signaling bitch who says she cried when floyd overdosed on fentanyl. But I was told to “Trust the plan.” And that “Trump knows what’s he is doing.”. Clears that was all bullshit and someone inside the admin was sabotaging him.
Yeah. She kind of seemed like bad news. Just set off the swamp radar.
First of all just because she was replacing RBG, and he replaced her with another woman was enough of a facepalm as it kind of showed he was playing into their frame or reality and was still trying to appease with that "see whose the real progressive?" mindset.
I like Scalia, and the main selling point was that she was like a student of his and learned a lot from him and took after him (or so they presented her).
Then that she's a Catholic and had adopted some african kids. This is the controversial one and might get me some downvotes, but it kind of came across as virtue signalling pretty early on. Adopting an exotic kid when there's so many in the U.S. with this wretched foster system suffering. Gave some secret leftist-activist vibe who would be a sympathizer to BLM and other bullshit which is a big no from me as it kind of hints at her real tendencies and leanings.
Just seemed like a bad decision in general.
Should've just picked the best man for the job instead of trying to appease leftists.
I don’t know what Trump was thinking. She was easily the worst possible choice. He was given a list of names, maybe she wasn’t as bad as the rest? None of them would’ve been good choices anyway since they all had to be pre-approved by the GOP.
I was downvoted because I dared to question her.
I notice, everyone we think highly of someone, they always betray us.
Sad to think the 2 bush justices are better than trumps 3, other than Roberts.
I remember someone said to me the same thing about ACB. I questioned why Trump would want a virtue-signaling bitch who says she cried when floyd overdosed on fentanyl. But I was told to “Trust the plan.” And that “Trump knows what’s he is doing.”. Clears that was all bullshit and someone inside the admin was sabotaging him.
Yeah. She kind of seemed like bad news. Just set off the swamp radar.
First of all just because she was replacing RBG, and he replaced her with another woman was enough of a facepalm as it kind of showed he was playing into their frame or reality and was still trying to appease with that "see whose the real progressive?" mindset.
I like Scalia, and the main selling point was that she was like a student of his and learned a lot from him and took after him (or so they presented her).
Then that she's a Catholic and had adopted some african kids. This is the controversial one and might get me some downvotes, but it kind of came across as virtue signalling pretty early on. Adopting an exotic kid when there's so many in the U.S. with this wretched foster system suffering. Gave some secret leftist-activist vibe who would be a sympathizer to BLM and other bullshit which is a big no from me as it kind of hints at her real tendencies and leanings.
Just seemed like a bad decision in general.
Should've just picked the best man for the job instead of trying to appease leftists.
I don’t know what Trump was thinking. She was easily the worst possible choice. He was given a list of names, maybe she wasn’t as bad as the rest? None of them would’ve been good choices anyway since they all had to be pre-approved by the GOP.
I was downvoted because I dared to question her.
I notice, everyone we think highly of someone, they always betray us.
Sad to think the 2 bush justices are better than trumps 3, other than Roberts.