One retard barks an order, everyone acts, no questions asked. Us patriots have minds of our own, and often times we disagree on how to accomplish something. I don’t know the solution to this problem, but it’s something to think about. The only thing I can envision happening is something so egregious occurring that we all come to the same conclusion on how to fix said problem, whatever it may be. That day will be a day of reckoning.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I'd love to agree but I can easily disprove you by demonstrating how quickly the sheep on this forum pile on anything one cuck thinks offends him or if it doesn't go along with the main narrative regardless of how nuances the subject may be. Mobs are mobs regardless of which direction the mass of the mobs leans, it has its own dynamics and laws of physics.
The left is more organized for entirely different reasons, "the right" could unite, and would unite, if we had solid leadership, but it doesn't seem to be a priority at the moment (it should be but it isn't).
It's a long and tedious conversation and I suspect it's not for this forum. Or open internet.
I have to disagree with you. Yes, there are retards who pile onto some simple minded bullshit here, but it pales in comparison to that of the reddit hivemind. I don’t participate in that groupthink, either. I’d say our problem is 2% of that of the left. That is also our biggest problem in a different way. We can’t come to a consensus about nearly anything specific. On very rare and cut-and-dry occurrences, like Goya for example, we can accomplish things. When it comes to organizing to accomplish goals that are less obvious, it’s impossible for us to find footing that holds ground, because we have people digging out the dirt under the rock we’re trying to stand on. Just look at the Superbowl example. Half of us say, “boycott,” the other says, “Trump did it, I’ll do whatever he does or whatever I want,”. Same goes for posting direct links to Twitter, or leaving Facebook.
It's not even close. If dude above wants to do a deep (or shallow) dive all he has to do is compare TD to r/politics.
You are partially right but we are talking about two different things here. I highly advise (re)reading Eric Hoffer's "The True Believer" then come back to this subject. Basically, what you are seeing right now is not an ability to think independently but a lack of coherence in the movement. The left has already gone through it many, many, many years, decades even ago. "The right" really never materialized or, rather, never became a movement (due to many inconsequential in the context of this conversation reasons), so what we are seeing right now is a formation of a mass movement which always comes with first a lot of voices that will appear authentic and independent at first but ultimately will have to start sounding more in unison otherwise the movement won't be cogent enough to survive.
Arguably, and ironically, this may be one of the main reasons why "the right" movements never materialize, but I disagree with such assessment, and as I've mentioned, the reasons are irrelevant right this minute, unless you want to take it that route.
I would argue that the right "in-fights" with itself about the means, not the end, because we have so many rational, free-thinking minds all trying to figure out the same problem. We just can't get to a solution that we all agree on to accomplish our goals, hence why half of us still support Twitter or the NFL despite their terrifying showmanship of their priorities.
The left is too retarded to think of any solutions, so their "leadership" just does it for them & tells them what to think about it.
What we need, I believe, is an infallible plan of action that the vast majority of the right can agree with to accomplish our goals. We need to be on the same page to get anything done.
You missed the point of "the left has done the same in-fighting back in the 1880-1890s (well, maybe all the way into 1930s)".
I can tell already that you know what we need and won't listen to anyone anyway, so Godspeed to you!