I've seen this one posted on here a lot. The primary reason you get 'suspicious' results is because most white people don't define themselves by their skin colour. If I google 'happy woman' I get a ratio far more representative of the population (1 in 10 black at most). 'Happy family' again returns majority white results.
The moment I stick 'white' in my search terms you start seeing more interracial results because people actually bother to attach race descriptors to those photos.
Yes, there probably is a disproportionate return rate for black women on the surface, but when you read the titles on a lot of the pictures the reason for their return starts to make sense. eg. "happy african woman waving hand over white stock photo." I also saw a number of titles where the clothing worn was white.
In my experience most white people will define themselves on a national level rather than by their skin colour. 'American Family', 'English family', 'French Family' all return majority white families.
Disclaimer: I'm not from America so my results may be less biased than yours.
It’s a good deal of effort to alter return search results in specific ways like this by a search engine provider. This explanation makes the most sense. Results also raise in ranking and likely returns the more people search. I can see people looking for stock images of happy women and happy black women, especially with marketing the way it is as opposed to happy white woman.
lol.. good call.... this is meme-worthy.........!
fuckgoogle
incidentally.. you get VERY similar results for "Happy White people" and "Happy White men"............
I've seen this one posted on here a lot. The primary reason you get 'suspicious' results is because most white people don't define themselves by their skin colour. If I google 'happy woman' I get a ratio far more representative of the population (1 in 10 black at most). 'Happy family' again returns majority white results.
The moment I stick 'white' in my search terms you start seeing more interracial results because people actually bother to attach race descriptors to those photos.
Yes, there probably is a disproportionate return rate for black women on the surface, but when you read the titles on a lot of the pictures the reason for their return starts to make sense. eg. "happy african woman waving hand over white stock photo." I also saw a number of titles where the clothing worn was white.
In my experience most white people will define themselves on a national level rather than by their skin colour. 'American Family', 'English family', 'French Family' all return majority white families.
Disclaimer: I'm not from America so my results may be less biased than yours.
It’s a good deal of effort to alter return search results in specific ways like this by a search engine provider. This explanation makes the most sense. Results also raise in ranking and likely returns the more people search. I can see people looking for stock images of happy women and happy black women, especially with marketing the way it is as opposed to happy white woman.
I did, and then I Googled "happy black women". If I didn't know better, I'd say there's some sort of agenda.
Duck-Duck-Go does the same!
yep. fuck google
Try the same search on Bing
What the heck is dreamstime.com ?
Rachel Dolezel...hahahaha
'DAT BE RACISS