I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for others.
They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.
China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.
"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, which is too kind. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a thirst for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.
they pretend to be communists' but theses oligarchic elite will pretend to be anything if it will get them money and power. best discerption I can think of is a neo-feudist,
I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for others.
They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.
China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.
"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, which is too kind. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a thirst for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.
they pretend to be communists' but theses oligarchic elite will pretend to be anything if it will get them money and power. best discerption I can think of is a neo-feudist,
Well said