You can't defeat it by complaining about it {period} you can change it from the inside though {period} {period} what you have to do is start a fact checker.. you need to get a group of a handful of people and start a website dedicated to fact checking after you've done a few hundred you can apply to Facebook to be a Facebook fact checker.. then you can do some good and actually fact check.. and before some naysayer tries to shoot down any proposals by claiming "it won't work!" yes it will Tucker Carlson's fact checker got approved by Facebook it's possible
No, only beliefs and false narratives. But they also think that simply saying something is true/not true, makes it so. It's how ALL of their "facts" and "debunking" work.
While fact checkers are some of the most pendantic liars out there, there is no formal interview process to become a fact checker, so we rate this claim mostly false.
I'm afraid this is incorrect. They hate the truth but love the facts. Truth is the reality of a whole but facts can individually be reviewed to help their agenda while still being rhetorically and 'logically' correct, i.e. a conservative says a truth like 'generally speaking, views against the establishment and so-called progress, more often from conservative users, are being censored by big tech' but the fact checkers will bring selective facts like some leftists being banned too or some conservatives being allowed to speak to deboonk the claim and label it pants on fire.
Snopes has fact checked this comic. Result: MIXED.
'While is is true that we do have a particular loathing for facts, an investigation into our HR department revealed that our hiring agent is not bald, as depicted.'
Sad thing is that this is an accurate representation of what happens
Snopes: the image portrays cartoons when the majority of fact checkers are in fact clowns. Mostly false.
Sad thing is that this is an accurate representation of what happens
While it is potentially true that the majority of people would find this sad if they knew about it, they do not actually know about it.
I give this statement a: Schumer's Pant's on fire rating.
You can't defeat it by complaining about it {period} you can change it from the inside though {period} {period} what you have to do is start a fact checker.. you need to get a group of a handful of people and start a website dedicated to fact checking after you've done a few hundred you can apply to Facebook to be a Facebook fact checker.. then you can do some good and actually fact check.. and before some naysayer tries to shoot down any proposals by claiming "it won't work!" yes it will Tucker Carlson's fact checker got approved by Facebook it's possible
To make it more accurate:
"What do you hate most?"
"Facts, Conservatives, logic, reason, truth, integrity, differing opinions......"
Also they would be wearing 5 face masks and not shaking hands.
they hate all facts that contradict their leftist lying agenda
Are there facts that support their agenda?
No, only beliefs and false narratives. But they also think that simply saying something is true/not true, makes it so. It's how ALL of their "facts" and "debunking" work.
haha.......checkmate
While fact checkers are some of the most pendantic liars out there, there is no formal interview process to become a fact checker, so we rate this claim mostly false.
The pre Ministry of Truth
Does he get a signing bonus if he says trump voters?
That's a promotion to CEO.
Accurate, just missing the lewd predatory criminal texts from the head of the organization luring the candidates to the casting couch...
Left: "Let's pretend our opinions are facts and their facts are opinions."
I personally would've liked to have seen the position go to a woman of color.
Journalists report fake news
Fact checkers censor and “debunk” real news
My two favourite things are commitment, and changing myself.
Wouldn’t you hate the pesky things that get in the way of you pushing your narrative!?
Fact checkers are like coat checkers, leave it all at the door.
Blunt and true.
Facts (that make democrat's look bad)
I'm afraid this is incorrect. They hate the truth but love the facts. Truth is the reality of a whole but facts can individually be reviewed to help their agenda while still being rhetorically and 'logically' correct, i.e. a conservative says a truth like 'generally speaking, views against the establishment and so-called progress, more often from conservative users, are being censored by big tech' but the fact checkers will bring selective facts like some leftists being banned too or some conservatives being allowed to speak to deboonk the claim and label it pants on fire.
Fact Check: OVERWHELMINGLY FALSE: The party at fault said 'nuh-uh'
Both seem to be white men.
Most fact checkers seem to be people with blue/pink hair of indeterminate gender.
Snopes has fact checked this comic. Result: MIXED.
'While is is true that we do have a particular loathing for facts, an investigation into our HR department revealed that our hiring agent is not bald, as depicted.'
Has anyone been able to figure out who is funding them? I know receives a chunk from Fakebook.
Personally I love being told what to think and that I can't learn and research on my own because Im just a plebe.. don't you?