283
Comments (47)
sorted by:
14
Lla26 14 points ago +17 / -3

Why?

12
SimPilot 12 points ago +13 / -1

I also would like to know. Is there a rundown? Other than physical appearance.

-1
jdog -1 points ago +4 / -5

You just hear a lot of rumors that him and Ivanka are always taking the Cucked position.

2
SimPilot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Part of advisory position is to provide different view points. Leader will weigh the information and make a decision.

-1
Judiwont -1 points ago +2 / -3

I don't think those are rumors. They want to distance themselves from her dad. but she is the apple of her dads eye and she can't do it.

5
hansgruber7 5 points ago +6 / -1

I think he's been behind a lot of questionable advice. I heard that he was the one who hand-picked Rosenstein at the DOJ and other similar terrible personnel decisions. He also is rumored to be pushing against Trump joining Gab. Those are just the ones that come to mind. He has also made comments supporting things like Climate Change, etc if I'm not mistaken.

3
Olds77 3 points ago +4 / -1

You heard he was behind Rosenstein? Why would Trump trust Jared to pick him? Post facts or gtfo.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't have to believe me but I did hear it from someone in a position to know more than most. I haven't heard any other explanation for why Trump picked him, so someone must have advised him to do it. Jared makes about as much sense as anyone else. We know that Jared is at the least at lot more centrist if not outright liberal than Trump.

1
Olds77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump got endless bad recommendations from GOP officials in numerous instances from folks like Pence, Sessions, McCain, Chris Christie among many, many others. Every account I had heard of Rosenstein was that Pence recommended him and seeing as how quickly Pence fired Flynn for not breaking the law I see no reason to doubt that. Jared's likely trusted by Trump because of his loyalty and Jared did deliver in the Middle East, where the liberals routinely mocked him and his wife before he and Trump proved it could be done. People want to hate on Jared and I've heard a lot of gossip, but never anything substantive.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

I absolutely agree he got a lot of bad advice from all those people. Especially Pence was probably a snake on the inside the whole time, responsible for a lot of these traitors. His role in firing Flynn I think did deep damage. I wouldn't be surprised if Pence was behind Rosenstein. I also agree Jared delivered in the Middle East when everyone ridiculed him. That was great. I did hear he supported picking Rosenstein from someone I think is in a position to know, but it's true I haven't seen proof behind what he told me. I also wouldn't be surprised if it was the case as the person I know is reliable and I don't think Jared is full MAGA like Trump is, though I do think he is loyal.

4
giantrabbit1 4 points ago +7 / -3

He was the one behind all the leaks in the Trump administration as a way to "keep Trump in line." It wasn't Pence as many people think, it was someone much, much closer to Trump, his son-in law who was Trump's closest adviser throughout the campaigns and presidency. This was confirmed on Dana Perino's show on Fox a couple of weeks ago.

Think about it -- who leaked the Sydney Powell + Flynn meeting discussing Martial Law they had with exact quotes to Axios? It was Jared, since much of the article describes private events that happened upstairs in the WH Residence behind closed doors. Mike Pence was NOT in Trump's bedroom, but Jared would've had access to it since he's family

2
PepePedebone 2 points ago +3 / -1

cippilone, medows and barr. There's more, but it wasn't Jared.

2
Olds77 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why the fuck are you watching Bush and Foxnews flunky Dana Perino and why would you ever take her seriously? You have zero idea what you're talking about.

1
giantrabbit1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't watch, but it was on the TV and I happened to notice. I turned off Faux Noise the day they hired Donna Brazille.

1
Olds77 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure you did and you took it seriously and quoted a worthless Bush flunky on Fox. Next you'll tell me there was no election fraud and that I need to tune in to Cavuto or something else. You're getting your news from Fox for some stupid reason and if you're that slow to be taking what those idiots say as gospel then maybe you need to just go back to Drudge and them.

1
giantrabbit1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look I don't trust Fox, but if they say something that makes sense to me logically and that I can verify, of course I'll talk about it.

Seriously: who else could've had access to Trump's bedroom on 12/18 when he wanted to have a private and secret meeting with Sydney and Flynn discussing Martial Law? It had to be close family. Either Jared or Ivanka. His kids and Melania were the only people that would have access to his private bedroom. Everyone else would have to call and meet him downstairs in the oval.

1
Olds77 1 point ago +2 / -1

You lied and said you stopped watching when Dana Brazile was hired and now you said you tuned in well after that. You know next to no details about what's happened in the white house. It wouldn't be a private or secret meeting if you had heard about it, but who says someone just didn't make stuff up, like the MSM has been repeatedly doing for at least all 4 years of Trump. You have no idea what was exchanged, who was invited or what, but you "heard", heard this from a FoxNews and George Bush Flunky on the Donna Brazile and Paul Ryan network and started spouting everything as gospel.

-1
giantrabbit1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I didn't lie. I personally do not watch Fox News and have not watched it in years at this point. The channel on my TV at my house happened to be on Fox and I just noticed what they were saying and it made sense to me. It was logical. That doesn't mean I take Fox as gospel or whatever, simply that it seemed logical and made sense.

Also, they didn't make up the meeting, since Flynn himself confirmed that he had a private meeting with Trump and Sydney on 12/18 regarding election fraud and invocation of ML to seize voting machines and redo the election with military supervision after the article broke. Flynn confirmed they wanted it to be private since they were discussing sensitive legal (Sydney) and military matters (Gen. Flynn). Now someone leaks the exact contents of the meeting with QUOTES to the press, when Trump specifically wanted it to be kept under wraps. Who could that be?

Seriously: who the fuck else would be allowed in Trump's bedroom? WHO?? It had to be one of his kids or Melania. Nobody else is allowed in Trump's bedroom

It's not Melania, since she prefers to be completely private and avoid all contact with the media.

It's not Barron, since he's only 14. It's not Jr, Eric, or Tiffany, since they don't work at the WH.

It HAS to be Jared & Ivanka. Stop with the blatant fanboyism of Jared and use some deductive reasoning.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
reason_island 13 points ago +15 / -2

I’ll admit to laughing at jokes about Jared, then we got like 17 peace deals.

Doubt he deserves this smear... your post is sus.

9
NoTimeToBleed 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the peace deals were impressive. Ann Coulter hates this guy though and blames him partly for subverting MAGA once Trump won. It's hard to know what to believe as he is barely on the record, so we have to rely on anonymous sources to support or condemn him. It probably would have been better if he and Ivanka stayed out of the White House, but Trump needed people with unbending loyalty. He had such little success finding those people.

4
Judiwont 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, Ann COulter is a piece of shit soo there is that.

4
mrs.rose 4 points ago +4 / -0

They may have been loyal to Trump, but not to MAGA

1
NoTimeToBleed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suspect they always kept one eye on the New York society pages. They were never compatible with MAGA.

3
Olds77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck Ann Coulter. She's a miserable bitch that stood by Bush for almost everything and looked for opportunity after opportunity to throw Trump under the bus who is infinitely better than Bush ever could have been. She's in the business of selling books and why you would listen to her I have zero idea. I trust Trump, not some idiot peddling books on Bill Maher.

4
Julius_Severus 4 points ago +6 / -2

"we got like 17 peace deals"

Who is this "we" you speak of? Israel got a bunch of peace deals. I'm not Israeli.

1
williammcfadden 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Trump administration, Nobel Peace Prize nominations, etc.

3
Julius_Severus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Perhaps I need to elaborate

All of those peace deals were to benefit Israel. How did any of them help me and mine?

1
williammcfadden 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the more valid question is why make peace and strengthen evil dictators. That was the brilliance of Reagan and how he freed Eastern Europe without a single shot being fired.

0
giantrabbit1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stability in the Middle East = fewer national security threats to America and an end to the endless wars.

1
Julius_Severus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or, here is a crazy theory, we don't allow immigration to America from the Middle East and we let Israel defend themselves

4
DrCowboyPresident 4 points ago +4 / -0

then we got like 17 peace deals.

We did? Or the Middle East did?

1
reason_island 1 point ago +1 / -0

When I say ‘we’ I meant those that benefit and support peace.

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
6
thewordwolf 6 points ago +9 / -3

Look into how he scammed the MAGA movement for cash.

Brad Parscale, too.

4
ZS2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

really? what did he do? "jared not parscale"

5
Officer_Glowie 5 points ago +8 / -3

Indeed.

3
NihilistCaregiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

but we have to be nice to him or heaven won't open up! /s

3
Julius_Severus 3 points ago +4 / -1

Jared isn't the cuck

The people who trusted Jared to put American interests before Israeli interests and the well being of Trump voters before his own self interest are the cucks

2
Judiwont 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess that is a much better way of putting it.

3
Skyrison 3 points ago +3 / -0

what happened NOW!? ffs -_-

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have to agree, I often wonder, why Ivanka with her bad bad self married this dude. I can tell with confidence, he is no ladies man, and life with him for her has to be like two men living together. The excitement factor has got to be so fake for her.

1
notstoolie3 1 point ago +2 / -1

Dude, what?

0
Rockhad10 0 points ago +1 / -1

Partners with Soros you know? Look it up

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
The_End_Is_Now 0 points ago +1 / -1

If true, I volunteer to be Ivanka’s next bull.

0
HeretostayUSA 0 points ago +2 / -2

Post and account are sus